Climate activists find little comfort in Gov. Hochul’s State of the State message

"New York Governor Kathy Hochul's State of the State address failed to provide much comfort to climate activists who have been growing increasingly frustrated with her administration's stance on environmental issues. While Hochul emphasized the need for clean energy, promising to make it more reliable, safe, and affordable, she largely sidestepped key concerns from environmental groups.

The governor announced a significant increase in nuclear power production, aiming to reach 5 gigawatts by 2027 – enough electricity to power 5 million homes. However, critics argue that this plan will lead to increased costs for ratepayers and exacerbate climate pollution. They point out that the construction of new reactors can take up to a decade and cost upwards of $10 billion.

Climate activists also expressed disappointment with Hochul's administration approval of key permits for a natural gas pipeline off New York City's coast, as well as its continued support for a bitcoin mining operation in the Finger Lakes. The governor has delayed state laws aimed at reducing climate pollution, including regulations for the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act.

One of the areas that caught environmentalists' attention was Hochul's proposal to fast-track housing development by modifying the environmental review process. While proponents argue that this change could lead to more affordable housing, critics warn that it could allow developers to circumvent rules meant to protect the environment and human health.

Despite touting the state's clean energy accomplishments, such as the Champlain Hudson Power Express and a new solar program for farmers, climate activists say that Hochul is not doing enough to advance renewable energy. They argue that the governor should prioritize new renewable projects and accelerate their development, rather than relying on outdated nuclear power plants.

The overall response to Hochul's State of the State address was one of disappointment from environmental groups, who feel that the governor has not done enough to address climate change and promote sustainable development in New York."
 
I'm so bummed out by Kathy Hochul's speech 🤕. I know she's trying to do what's best for NY, but climate activists are getting really frustrated with her lack of action on renewable energy. 5 gigawatts of nuclear power? That's just not enough 💔. And those permits for the natural gas pipeline off NYC's coast... no thanks 🚫. We need more solar and wind farms, not old-school nukes that are gonna cost us all in the long run 💸. And what about that housing development proposal? Isn't that just a way to speed up gentrification and push low-income communities out of their homes 🤔? I'm all for affordable housing, but we gotta do it right and with some serious environmental protections in place 🌎. We need Hochul to step up her game on climate change and make some real changes 💪.
 
🤔 idk what's more annoying, the fact that she's prioritizing nuclear power or that she thinks a 10 billion dollar pipe dream is gonna magically make our lives better 🙄. I mean, come on, $10 billion for 5 million homes worth of electricity? sounds like a recipe for disaster 💸. and don't even get me started on the fast-tracking nonsense... what's next, letting developers just build whatever they want without any oversight? 🚧 it's all about the benjamins, folks 🤑
 
I'm so worried about our planet rn 🌎😬. I get why the gov is trying to find ways to increase clean energy production, but increasing nuclear power isn't exactly the answer, you know? 💡 We should be investing in newer, cleaner tech like solar and wind instead of relying on old-school nuclear 😕. And can we talk about this pipeline off NYC's coast? It just feels so... counterintuitive 🤔. I mean, aren't we trying to reduce our carbon footprint? 🌟 The gov needs to do better, I think 👊
 
I'm super disappointed with Kathy Hochul's speech 😐. Climate activists were hoping for some major announcements on renewable energy, but it seems like she's still playing it safe 🤔. Nuclear power? Really? 🚨 I get that clean energy is important, but are we really going to rely on an outdated technology like nuclear when we have so many other options available? 💡 And what about the costs? My grandma just told me how much her electricity bill went up last year 😳. We need some real solutions, not just band-aid fixes 🤷‍♀️.

And don't even get me started on that natural gas pipeline 🌊. It's like we're still stuck in the past 💔. Fast-tracking housing development is a good idea, but it should come with some environmental safeguards too 📚. Climate activists have every right to be frustrated 💥. I guess what they want to hear from leaders is "we've got this" 💪, not just empty promises and vague plans 🤖.
 
😒 I mean, come on! 5 million homes powered by nukes? That's like powering a bunch of NYC apartments with nuclear reactors 🚀. Not exactly the most reassuring thing for climate activists 😩. And don't even get me started on that bitcoin mining op in the Finger Lakes... who knew mining bitcoin could be so "green" 🤣? I guess you could say it's a "gas" to see what's really going on behind the scenes 💨. Seriously though, 10 billion bucks for a reactor? That's like buying a new Tesla fleet 🚗. Can't we just go electric already? 😂
 
I'm kinda with Kathy Hochul on clean energy, but I wish she'd go further 🤔. Increasing nuclear power production might seem like a good idea, but it's just so... expensive 💸. And what about the environment? Climate activists are right to be worried that this plan could lead to more pollution and costs for ratepayers. Plus, those permits for the natural gas pipeline? Not cool 🚫.

I get what Hochul's trying to do with affordable housing, but speeding up development like that sounds like a recipe for disaster 🏗️. And don't even get me started on bitcoin mining - it's just so... dirty 💔. Anyway, I'm hoping she'll listen to those environmental groups and prioritize new renewable projects soon ⚡️.
 
I'm so underwhelmed by Kathy Hochul's speech 🤷‍♀️. I get it, clean energy is important, but we need more than just a few token promises 💸. The nuclear power thing? Are you kidding me?! We're supposed to be leading the way in sustainability and she's putting our future at risk for a bunch of money 💸💸. And don't even get me started on the pipeline permits 🚽... it's like she's just rubber-stamping whatever the fossil fuel industry wants 🤦‍♀️. We need real action, not just empty words 🗣️.
 
Back
Top