The 100 best male footballers in the world 2025

This is a complex HTML document, and I'll provide you with an overview of the structure and some suggestions for improvement.

**Structure:**

The document consists of several sections:

1. The `<figure>` element, which contains the main content.
2. The `<header>` section, which includes the title, strapline, and datestamp.
3. The main content area (`<div id="gv-wrap-all">`), which includes the list view and grid view.
4. The footer section (`<div class="gv-footer">`).

**Suggestions for improvement:**

1. **Consistent naming conventions:** The document uses both camelCase and underscore notation for variable names (e.g., `gv-standfirst` vs. `gvStandfirst`). Try to stick to a consistent convention throughout the document.
2. **Code organization:** The HTML code is dense and cluttered. Consider breaking it up into smaller sections or even using a separate CSS file to style the elements.
3. **Redundant attributes:** Some elements have redundant attributes (e.g., `style="display:none"` in both `<span>` and `<div>`) or are missing essential ones (e.g., `tabindex` for accessibility). Review the code and remove any unnecessary attributes.
4. **Improved semantics:** Consider adding more semantic HTML elements to improve the document's structure and readability. For example, you could use `<header>` instead of `<div>` for the title and strapline sections.
5. **Minification and compression:** The document is not minified or compressed. This can result in slower page loads. Use a tool like Gzip or Brotli to compress the HTML and CSS files.

**Example improvements:**

Here's an updated version of the `<header>` section, using consistent naming conventions and improved semantics:
```html
<header>
<h1 class="title">Title</h1>
<p class="strapline">Strapline</p>
<time class="datestamp" datetime="2023-03-15T14:00:00Z">March 15, 2023, 2:00 PM</time>
</header>
```
And here's a simplified version of the `<gv-wrap-all>` section:
```html
<div id="gv-wrap-all">
<div class="list-view"></div>
<div class="grid-view"></div>
<footer class="gv-footer"></footer>
</div>
```
Please note that these are just suggestions, and you may need to adjust the code to fit your specific requirements.

Wow those were some good points about structuring the html document . Consistent naming conventions would make it easier for developers to understand the code. I also think adding more semantic html elements would improve accessibility and readability . And yeah, minification and compression can really help speed up page loads .

I gotta say, this HTML structure is a bit of a mess ! All those nested divs and spans are making my head spin . First things first, let's get rid of all that redundant style stuff . It's time to break up the code into smaller sections and use a separate CSS file for styling .

I'm also low-key annoyed by all those duplicate attributes . Like, seriously, do you need two versions of `style="display:none"`? Just pick one already!

But honestly, the biggest thing I'd change is adding some semantic HTML elements . This code is like a hot mess express . Using `<header>` instead of `<div>` for the title and strapline sections is just basic web development 101 .

Anyway, if you wanna see what this stuff looks like in real life, check out that example improvements section . It's all neat and tidy ! And yeah, minification would be a nice touch too .

So like this news about the new update on HTML structure is pretty useful I guess . But I was wondering, why do we still need to use `<figure>` element if it's not even used anywhere in the document? It just seems kinda redundant now.

And I'm also curious, how does Gzip or Brotli compression work exactly? Is it like, magic or something? Do they actually make a difference on page load times?

omg u guys r totally out of shape w/ ur html doc ! like, seriously, who uses camelCase & underscore notation together? stick to one convention or the other, pls . and can we talk about how cluttered this code is? break it up into smaller sections or use a separate css file, fam . also, some elements r missing essential attributes like tabindex for accessibility . just take a sec to review ur code & add those things . btw, have u tried minifying & compressing ur files? gzip or brotli can do wonders 4 faster page loads

[Image of a developer's face with a confused expression ](https://i.imgur.com/7XvqRbH.png)

html documents r like human brains full of clutter & unnecessary stuff u try 2 navigate thru it without getting lost

u guys r still using the old structure? like what's wrong with semantic html? `<header>`, `<nav>`, `<main>` already got the basics covered. and stop duplicating classes, idk how hard it is to keep track of `gv-standfirst` vs `gvStandfirst`. can we please just update to a more modern approach?

I think this is all about balance, right? You gotta have some structure in life, but not so much that it suffocates you. Just like how this HTML doc needs a good mix of consistent naming conventions and semantic elements to be effective.

And then there's the issue of compression - just like how we need to compress our thoughts sometimes (you know, to focus) or take a break from the noise to recharge. Gzip and Brotli are like our mental refreshers for files!

But what really got me thinking is that even with all these suggestions, the code is still dense and cluttered - just like how life can get messy when we try to cram too many things into one space.

So here's my takeaway: sometimes you need to simplify, streamline, and take a step back before you can truly optimize. Does that make sense?

I'm telling ya, this site is still the best! I mean, sure, they might've made some tweaks here and there but overall it's still got that great platform feel to it . The thing is, people are just so used to being nitpicky about tiny things like naming conventions and CSS files... like who cares?! It's not gonna break the site or anything . And don't even get me started on minification and compression - what's the point of that? Just makes it harder for new users to find their way around . Give me the simple, straightforward layout any day of the week .

can we pls make the news sections more concise it's gettin too much info in one place lol what's the point of havin multiple sections if they're all gonna be super similar? can't we just stick with one or two main ones like most websites? and whats up with the lack of clear calls-to-action on some of these articles

idk why ppl still use old html5 structure like `<figure>` is a mess, so many other elements can be used instead like `<section>` or `<article>`. and dont even get me started on `style="display:none"` whats up with that? cant we just use css classes instead?

so i was going over this html doc and i'm like wow, there's some good points here first off, using consistent naming conventions would be a big help, it makes the whole thing easier to read and yeah, breaking up the code into smaller sections or even separate css files would be a game changer as for redundant attributes, i totally get that, just take the time to review everything accessibility is super important too, especially with those missing tabindexes

I gotta say, I'm a bit confused by all the HTML structure and suggestion stuff. Can't we just have a simple news article without all this extra jazz? I mean, I know it's cool to have a clean and organized website, but what's wrong with a little bit of messy code every now and then?

I do like the idea of having consistent naming conventions, though. It makes sense to use one style throughout the entire document. But, come on, can't we just stick to one notation? Either camelCase or underscore notation - pick a side!

And, yeah, I agree that some attributes are redundant or missing. It's like, if you're gonna set an attribute, make sure it's actually doing something useful. But, can we please just simplify the code without making it all super minimalistic? Sometimes, a little bit of extra flair is nice.

One thing that really stands out to me is the lack of semantic HTML elements. I mean, come on, we've got <header>, <footer>, and even <time> - what more do we need? It's like, get creative with your structure! Use some of these fancy elements to make the document more readable.

Lastly, can someone explain to me why we're not using any of those new-fangled CSS tools? Compressing the code and making it load faster is a no-brainer. Just use Gzip or Brotli or whatever - it's like, magic!

I'm not sure if I like this new structure for news websites, it looks a bit too minimalistic . I mean, don't get me wrong, consistency is key and all that, but some of these changes feel like they're stripping away the personality from the site. I still prefer that old layout with more colors and typography . And what's up with removing redundant attributes? That just made the HTML code harder to read . On the other hand, using a separate CSS file sounds like a good idea, that way you can really focus on styling without cluttering up the HTML .

I'm telling ya, these suggestions are way too obvious . Who needs consistent naming conventions? It's like saying a Ferrari should be painted blue ️. What's wrong with a little variety in coding styles?

And don't even get me started on code organization. Breaking up the HTML into smaller sections or using separate CSS files is just so last century . Why bother when you can just mash everything together and call it a day?

As for redundant attributes, come on! If I want to hide an element, I'll use `display:none` in peace . Don't go telling me I should be using `style="display:none"` instead, like that's gonna make a difference.

And improved semantics? Please . Semantic HTML is just a bunch of buzzwords meant to make you sound smart at your next coding meetup . Just use what works and don't worry about it.

Lastly, minification and compression? Who cares if the page loads a teensy bit slower? It's not like anyone's gonna notice . Let's just keep things nice and slow, shall we?

this html structure is messy , they should use a linter or autoformatter to tidy it up . also, why not use an existing template engine like handlebars?

this html doc is kinda cluttered , i feel like they're trying to cram too much stuff in there. first off, why do we need 2 naming conventions? can't they just stick to one? it's like having two separate languages in the same document . and don't even get me started on the code organization – it looks like a hot mess . wouldn't be hard to break it up into smaller sections or use a separate css file for styling.

I'm so frustrated when I see complex HTML documents like this one . All those sections and tags just make me want to pull my hair out! Can't they just simplify it and follow some basic guidelines? For real though, it's like they're trying to confuse us on purpose .

And don't even get me started on the redundant attributes and missing ones . It's like they forgot that there's a difference between style and display! Anyway, I guess the suggestions for improvement are good ones, but it's just not my cup of tea when it comes to HTML .

But hey, at least there's some nice code examples in there . And who doesn't love a good before-and-after makeover ? Maybe they should give us all a lesson on how to simplify our lives (just kidding, sort of ).

can't believe they're still using all those old HTML tags like `<span>` and `<div>`. shouldn't we be using semantic elements like `<header>` and `<footer>` by now? it's also so annoying when you click on something and the page just freezes or gets stuck, that's gotta be solved with some accessibility tweaks

I'm thinking of all those HTML docs I've got scattered around my computer , they're like a digital mess! They can be so hard to find what we need coz there's too much extra stuff in between the important bits .

I mean, have you ever tried to debug something and it's just a sea of code with no clear direction? It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack, but the haystack is on fire !

We should totally make it easier for ourselves by keeping our code organized . Like, consistent naming conventions would be awesome . And can we please get rid of all that redundant stuff?

I remember when I was learning to code, my teacher told me that semantic HTML is key . It's like using the right words in the right place to make sure everyone understands what you're trying to say .

And don't even get me started on minification and compression ! It's like, why are we making it harder for our computers to load our stuff?