Federal Judge Bars Immigration Agents from Retaliating Against Protesters in Minnesota, Opens Probe into Mayor and Governor's Roles
A federal judge has temporarily barred immigration agents from retaliating against people engaging in lawful and peaceful protest in Minneapolis under the Department of Homeland Security's Operation Metro Surge. The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez, applies to all persons who do or will in the future record, observe, and/or protest Operation Metro Surge and related operations.
According to the judge's order, federal agents are prohibited from arresting or detaining peaceful protesters "in retaliation for their protected conduct and absent a showing of probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a crime or is obstructing or interfering with the activities." The ruling also bars Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from stopping drivers and passengers unless there's reasonable suspicion that they're obstructing federal enforcement activities.
The judge wrote that "the act of safely following Covered Federal Agents at an appropriate distance does not, by itself, create reasonable suspicion to justify a vehicle stop." The ACLU filed the lawsuit in December on behalf of plaintiffs who alleged that they were arrested for lawfully protesting or documenting DHS activity.
Federal officials disputed much of the lawsuit's claims, saying that crowds often became large, hostile and dangerous, with people throwing snowballs, ice, and other objects, blocking vehicles, and surrounding officers. They claimed that pepper spray and other force was used only after repeated warnings and when agents could not move their vehicles safely.
The ruling is a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding Operation Metro Surge, which has been criticized for its handling of immigration enforcement activities. The order will be shared with all agents in the area over the next 72 hours.
As part of the probe into mayor and governor's roles, the investigation may examine whether local officials exceeded their authority by deploying federal agents to enforce state immigration laws without proper oversight or approval.
A federal judge has temporarily barred immigration agents from retaliating against people engaging in lawful and peaceful protest in Minneapolis under the Department of Homeland Security's Operation Metro Surge. The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez, applies to all persons who do or will in the future record, observe, and/or protest Operation Metro Surge and related operations.
According to the judge's order, federal agents are prohibited from arresting or detaining peaceful protesters "in retaliation for their protected conduct and absent a showing of probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the person has committed a crime or is obstructing or interfering with the activities." The ruling also bars Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from stopping drivers and passengers unless there's reasonable suspicion that they're obstructing federal enforcement activities.
The judge wrote that "the act of safely following Covered Federal Agents at an appropriate distance does not, by itself, create reasonable suspicion to justify a vehicle stop." The ACLU filed the lawsuit in December on behalf of plaintiffs who alleged that they were arrested for lawfully protesting or documenting DHS activity.
Federal officials disputed much of the lawsuit's claims, saying that crowds often became large, hostile and dangerous, with people throwing snowballs, ice, and other objects, blocking vehicles, and surrounding officers. They claimed that pepper spray and other force was used only after repeated warnings and when agents could not move their vehicles safely.
The ruling is a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding Operation Metro Surge, which has been criticized for its handling of immigration enforcement activities. The order will be shared with all agents in the area over the next 72 hours.
As part of the probe into mayor and governor's roles, the investigation may examine whether local officials exceeded their authority by deploying federal agents to enforce state immigration laws without proper oversight or approval.