Data Brokers' Pipeline Fueling Violence Against Public Servants Lacking Effective Privacy Protections
A new report by the Security Project at the Public Service Alliance has found that the lack of comprehensive state-level consumer privacy laws leaves public servants vulnerable to data-to-violence pipelines. The project analyzed 19 different consumer privacy laws, and only California's law provides consumers with a straightforward way to limit what information data brokers collect and sell about them.
Violent threats against public servants have been increasing over the past decade, according to an analysis by the Public Service Alliance and the Impact Project. However, these laws do not provide adequate protections for public servants, leaving them uniquely exposed to data dissemination without effective measures in place.
The report highlights how data brokers can obtain personal information about public employees from public sources such as property records or court filings. This data is then sold to third parties, who can use it to identify and stalk individuals even when they move to different states. In the past, accessing this information required physical presence at specific locations, but with the digitization of public records and their easy accessibility, threats against public servants have become more widespread.
The report advocates for legislation that would specifically address privacy concerns for all public servants. It suggests regulating the digitization of public records and how easily they can be accessed remotely, rather than completely limiting them. This approach aims to balance First Amendment rights with individual privacy while preventing the sale of personal information by data brokers.
Consumer Reports analyzed seven different data removal services in 2024 and found that only about two-thirds were successful at removing personal data from online records. The report's findings emphasize the need for lawmakers to establish effective state-level consumer privacy laws that would protect public servants' private information, preventing it from falling into the wrong hands and fueling threats against them.
Without comprehensive protections, the lack of an easy way to limit what information data brokers collect about individuals will only exacerbate the vulnerability of public servants.
A new report by the Security Project at the Public Service Alliance has found that the lack of comprehensive state-level consumer privacy laws leaves public servants vulnerable to data-to-violence pipelines. The project analyzed 19 different consumer privacy laws, and only California's law provides consumers with a straightforward way to limit what information data brokers collect and sell about them.
Violent threats against public servants have been increasing over the past decade, according to an analysis by the Public Service Alliance and the Impact Project. However, these laws do not provide adequate protections for public servants, leaving them uniquely exposed to data dissemination without effective measures in place.
The report highlights how data brokers can obtain personal information about public employees from public sources such as property records or court filings. This data is then sold to third parties, who can use it to identify and stalk individuals even when they move to different states. In the past, accessing this information required physical presence at specific locations, but with the digitization of public records and their easy accessibility, threats against public servants have become more widespread.
The report advocates for legislation that would specifically address privacy concerns for all public servants. It suggests regulating the digitization of public records and how easily they can be accessed remotely, rather than completely limiting them. This approach aims to balance First Amendment rights with individual privacy while preventing the sale of personal information by data brokers.
Consumer Reports analyzed seven different data removal services in 2024 and found that only about two-thirds were successful at removing personal data from online records. The report's findings emphasize the need for lawmakers to establish effective state-level consumer privacy laws that would protect public servants' private information, preventing it from falling into the wrong hands and fueling threats against them.
Without comprehensive protections, the lack of an easy way to limit what information data brokers collect about individuals will only exacerbate the vulnerability of public servants.