idk why starmer office is being so chill about mandelson, doesnt it raise red flags that he was in contact with someone as shady as epstein? also what about all the other times mandelson seemed to be doing favors for epstein's pals? seems like there's more to this story than just a one-time mistake...
can't believe they didn't catch on sooner lol, like, how many times do you gotta hear the same story before it becomes a thing? anyway, I think it's super worrying that PM Starmer basically gave Mandelson a free pass just 'cause he followed parliamentary rules... what about accountability? shouldn't there be more to this than just ticking boxes?
and omg, who exactly was keeping an eye on Epstein and his associates in the first place? it's all very suspicious, you know? can we get some answers here? also, has anyone thought about how this might affect the Labour party's reputation? they're already taking a hit for having Mandelson as a member...
I'm not buying that Starmer's office is just giving Mandelson a free pass because he was following parliamentary rules back then... like, come on! It's one thing to be in the know about market-sensitive info, but another to have ties to a convicted sex offender who has a history of, you know, using his influence for dubious purposes. How could that not raise some serious red flags? And what about the fact that Mandelson kept those connections hidden from the public eye? It's all very suspicious to me .
I gotta say, it's a bit of a wake-up call when you think about all the old faces still waltzing around with these scandals. I mean, Peter Mandelson's been in some hot water before, but this is serious stuff. It raises so many questions – how did no one catch wind of this sooner? And what exactly was he doing sharing sensitive info with Epstein? The fact that Starmer's office is downplaying the whole thing just seems... dodgy to me. We need some transparency and accountability here, you know? Can't let these power players think they're above the law just because of their connections.
This is getting serious, mate! I'm not surprised they're launching an investigation, but I gotta say, it's a bit dodgy that no action was taken at first . I mean, we all know how those Epstein connections came back to haunt Mandelson, and yet the PM's office just shrugs it off? Not buying it! There has to be more to this story than meets the eye, and I'm sure there will be some skeletons coming out of the closet soon enough. The fact that Starmer himself had to respond to this during PMQs tells you he knows it's a big deal . Mark my words, this is gonna get ugly for Mandelson, and not in a good way .
this is a big one ... can't believe it slipped under the radar for so long . Mandelson's ties to Epstein are sketchy at best, and now we're finding out he shared sensitive info with him? that's some serious red flags . Starmer's decision not to take action yet is puzzling , seems like he's trying to let the investigation run its course . But what if this was just a cover-up? wouldn't be surprised if more info comes out and it's a whole lot worse .
also what about all the other times mandelson seemed to be doing favors for epstein's pals? seems like there's more to this story than just a one-time mistake...
anyway, I think it's super worrying that PM Starmer basically gave Mandelson a free pass just 'cause he followed parliamentary rules... what about accountability? shouldn't there be more to this than just ticking boxes?
it's all very suspicious, you know? can we get some answers here? 
also, has anyone thought about how this might affect the Labour party's reputation? they're already taking a hit for having Mandelson as a member... 
.
I gotta say, it's a bit of a wake-up call when you think about all the old faces still waltzing around with these scandals. I mean, Peter Mandelson's been in some hot water before, but this is serious stuff. It raises so many questions – how did no one catch wind of this sooner? And what exactly was he doing sharing sensitive info with Epstein? 
We need some transparency and accountability here, you know? Can't let these power players think they're above the law just because of their connections. 
There has to be more to this story than meets the eye, and I'm sure there will be some skeletons coming out of the closet soon enough. The fact that Starmer himself had to respond to this during PMQs tells you he knows it's a big deal 
. Mark my words, this is gonna get ugly for Mandelson, and not in a good way 
... can't believe it slipped under the radar for so long 
. Mandelson's ties to Epstein are sketchy at best, and now we're finding out he shared sensitive info with him? 
that's some serious red flags 
. Starmer's decision not to take action yet is puzzling 
, seems like he's trying to let the investigation run its course 
. But what if this was just a cover-up? 
wouldn't be surprised if more info comes out and it's a whole lot worse 
.