A US government agency has launched a bizarre attack on the First Amendment rights of two journalists, Don Lemon and Georgia Fort. The former CNN host and the independent journalist were arrested for reporting live from a protest in Minneapolis, where they were covering the anti-ICE movement.
According to prosecutors, the journalists' "crime" was that they were in close proximity to the pastor of a church who had ties to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This alleged close proximity is apparently enough to trigger the FACE Act, which prohibits interference or intimidation at reproductive health clinics and places of worship.
The irony here is not lost on observers. Covering a protest, even one inside a church, is not a crime. Asking questions - including difficult ones - about government actions that affect public safety is also protected by the First Amendment.
In reality, prosecutors are trying to silence journalists who are reporting on their government's aggressive tactics to intimidate and stifle dissent. This is a classic authoritarian move, one that undermines democracy.
The FACE Act was written in 1994 to protect reproductive health clinics from violence and intimidation. It has since been used by some to target not just clinic staff but also anyone who dares to report on anti-abortion violence.
If we allow prosecutors to prosecute journalists for reporting on public events, it sets a chilling precedent that would be disastrous for a free press.
According to prosecutors, the journalists' "crime" was that they were in close proximity to the pastor of a church who had ties to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This alleged close proximity is apparently enough to trigger the FACE Act, which prohibits interference or intimidation at reproductive health clinics and places of worship.
The irony here is not lost on observers. Covering a protest, even one inside a church, is not a crime. Asking questions - including difficult ones - about government actions that affect public safety is also protected by the First Amendment.
In reality, prosecutors are trying to silence journalists who are reporting on their government's aggressive tactics to intimidate and stifle dissent. This is a classic authoritarian move, one that undermines democracy.
The FACE Act was written in 1994 to protect reproductive health clinics from violence and intimidation. It has since been used by some to target not just clinic staff but also anyone who dares to report on anti-abortion violence.
If we allow prosecutors to prosecute journalists for reporting on public events, it sets a chilling precedent that would be disastrous for a free press.