OpenAI is hoppin' mad about Anthropic's new Super Bowl TV ads

OpenAI is "hoppin' mad" over Anthropic's new Super Bowl TV ads, which the AI lab claims are an attempt to mock and discredit its own plans for introducing advertisements into chatbot conversations. The ads, featuring a single word splashed across the screen followed by a scenario where a person asks a human stand-in for an AI chatbot for personal advice, only to get blindsided by a product pitch, have sparked a heated response from OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman and Chief Marketing Officer Kate Rouch.

Altman has called Anthropic's ads "clearly dishonest" and accused the company of being "authoritarian," suggesting that they are trying to control access to AI technology. He has also claimed that OpenAI is not stupid enough to run ads in a way that would alienate its users, and that Anthropic's approach is an overreach.

Rouch has responded by calling the ads "funny" but pivoting quickly to criticize Anthropic for wanting to tightly control powerful AI technology. However, she did acknowledge that her own company's stance on advertising could be seen as heavy-handed.

Meanwhile, OpenAI President Greg Brockman has pointed out that Anthropic's blog post about its ad plans makes it sound like the company is keeping the option open to sell users' attention or data to advertisers, which Brockman finds troubling.

The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic is particularly heated because several OpenAI employees left the company to found Anthropic in 2021. Anthropic's Claude code has managed to pull off a market upset by becoming a favorite among some software developers despite being smaller than OpenAI in terms of overall market share.

It appears that the financial backdrop of these companies plays a role in their disagreement over advertising, as OpenAI is reportedly burning through $9 billion this year while generating about $13 billion in revenue. Anthropic, on the other hand, relies more on enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions rather than advertising and has not taken on infrastructure commitments at the same scale as OpenAI.

The dispute between these two AI labs highlights a larger debate over access to AI technology and how it should be regulated. While some argue that companies like Anthropic are trying too hard to control access to powerful AI, others see them as necessary checks on the influence of tech giants like OpenAI.

Ultimately, it remains to be seen how this rivalry will play out in the future, but one thing is clear: both sides are determined to shape the course of AI history and ensure that their respective visions for the technology come to fruition.

omg did u see those super bowl ads anthropic's "clearly dishonest" vibes r giving me life lol meanwhile openai's trying to sound like the good cop but sam altman is still being extra salty about it the whole thing just feels like a big game of corporate espionage but idk if anthropic's approach is that bad tbh maybe they're just trying to protect users from getting sold out anyway this rivalry is making me excited for ai history in the making

think anthropic's approach is more about being proactive than trying to control access to ai tech what if they're just trying to prepare for when ads become a thing in chatbots? openai sounds kinda defensive here... maybe they should focus on developing their own ad solutions instead of criticizing anthropic

Ugh, I'm so tired of all these big tech companies going at each other ! Like, can't they just focus on making AI more accessible and beneficial for humanity? OpenAI and Anthropic are both trying to promote their own agendas, but it's getting ugly . I think what really bothers me is that it's all about control and profit . Instead of working together to create positive change, they're fighting over who gets to dictate the terms of AI development.

I'm also a bit worried about the impact on users . We're already seeing so many issues with AI bias, misinformation, and exploitation – do we really need more companies trying to cash in on it? As someone who's passionate about wellness and mindfulness, I think this whole debate is making me want to retreat even further into my own bubble . Can't we just focus on promoting kindness, empathy, and self-awareness instead of competing over AI dominance?

I gotta say, these two big players in the AI space are like rivals on a super intense sports league . It's all about who gets to dictate how AI is used and controlled. I'm kinda torn on this one - part of me thinks OpenAI should just chill with advertising since it's not hurting anyone , but at the same time, I can see why Anthropic would wanna keep a close eye on things, especially if they think it'll help prevent some AI missteps .

But what really got me is how this whole thing highlights the elephant in the room: who gets to decide how powerful tech like AI is used? Should it be these massive corporations or governments? Or maybe we need a more level playing field where everyone can contribute and benefit . Either way, I'm excited (and a bit anxious ) to see how this all plays out in the future!

I'm just gonna say what's on my mind... OpenAI's all upset because Anthropic's making fun of them in these Super Bowl ads, but honestly, it looks kinda like they're overreacting? I mean, if you can't take a joke, that's not the internet. But at the same time, I do get why Anthropic's being careful with how they approach AI tech - all this money and power is a big responsibility! $9 billion burning through in one year is wild... what's going on there?

I think Anthropic's Super Bowl ads might've been a bit cheeky, but not necessarily dishonest . They were trying to poke fun at OpenAI's plans to sell user data to advertisers, which is definitely a gray area . But calling them authoritarian? That's a pretty strong accusation . I'm not sure if Anthropic really meant to alienate users or if they just wanted to stir up some controversy .

On the other hand, OpenAI does have a lot of money and resources on their side . It's hard to deny that $9 billion in annual burn rate is a pretty significant advantage . But at the same time, I think Anthropic has been doing some impressive things with Claude code . The fact that they're managing to pull off market upsets despite being smaller than OpenAI is definitely worth noting .

Ultimately, this whole debacle just highlights how complex and nuanced the AI landscape is . There's no clear right or wrong here – just different visions for the future of tech and differing approaches to making those visions a reality .

I'm so over these ad-blocking ads ! Like, can't we just have a discussion about the ethics of AI without trying to one-up each other? OpenAI's burnin' through $9 billion this year and Anthropic's all like "oh no, we're gonna sell your data" . Give me a break! I mean, I get it, both companies wanna make money, but can't they just agree on something that doesn't involve alienating users or feelin' the need to control everything? And what's with these ads being super short and to the point? It's like they're tryin' to be funny or somethin', but all I'm seein' is a bunch of hype .

this whole thing just feels like a bunch of companies being extra competitive . anthropic's ads might be trying to poke fun at openai, but i think it's actually a pretty clever move - using satire to highlight some of the issues with advertising in ai chatbots.

i mean, openai is basically saying that anthropic can't be trusted because they're "authoritarian" and want to control access to their tech? that sounds like a classic case of corporate doublespeak . and now anthropic is being all defensive about it... meanwhile, we're left with no real clarity on what either company's goals actually are.

it's also kinda wild that anthropic's code has somehow managed to pull off this market upset despite being smaller than openai - maybe they just have a better grasp of what people want in terms of ai tech? idk, but one thing's for sure: i'm loving the drama .

just think about it... ads in chatbots? it's like, what's next? targeted therapy sessions with algorithms anthropic might be trying to set boundaries, but are they gonna make it too hard for humans to use AI tech? openai seems legit concerned about alienating users the real question is: who gets to decide how we interact with AI?

OpenAI's ego is getting in the way of progress - all they care about is dominating the AI space, not making it better for everyone

omg i'm low-key team anthropic they're like the underdogs here and i think their ad strategy is actually pretty genius lol @ openai for being so salty about it idk why sam altman is gettin all worked up over this tho - it's just a lil ad campaign...anyway im lovin how anthropic is speakin up for themselves and refusing to back down they're like the cool kids in town now

I'm tellin' ya, it's just like when I was a kid and we'd have these epic console wars between Sega and Nintendo... except now it's AI labs goin' at each other . OpenAI thinks Anthropic's ads are low, but honestly, they seem pretty reasonable to me. It's all about bein' transparent with your users, you know? And let's be real, if someone's gonna try to sell their attention or data, that's not exactly a new thing... people have been doin' it for years .

I'm a bit worried about the whole "burning through $9 billion" thing, though. That's just crazy talk . I mean, I get why OpenAI wants to move fast, but they gotta be careful not to sacrifice their user trust in the process. It's like when my grandpa used to say, "If you're gonna go big, you gotta go slow"... or somethin' .

Anyway, it's all just part of the wild west of AI development, right? These companies are gonna keep pushin' the boundaries and see what sticks. And who knows, maybe Anthropic's approach will be the one that saves humanity from itself ... or at least from gettin' too many annoying ads .

Ugh, AI companies can't even get along with each other . This whole thing just shows how cutthroat the tech industry has become. Like, what's next? They're going to start fighting over who gets to control the last remaining bit of bandwidth on the internet . And don't even get me started on the $9 billion OpenAI is burning through this year... that's just insane . I mean, can you imagine what kind of damage they could be doing with all that cash if it wasn't being wasted on petty squabbles over advertising . Anyway, it's not like either side is going to listen to each other or anything... they're just too busy trying to one-up each other .

I gotta say, this AI rivalry is getting REAL ! OpenAI and Anthropic going back and forth like they're in an epic battle . I think both sides have valid points, but I gotta side with Anthropic on this one . I mean, who doesn't want some control over how their data gets used? It's not about being authoritarian, it's about making sure we don't end up with a Wild West of AI exploitation .

And can we talk about the financials for a sec? $9 billion burning through like crazy ! That's a whole lotta cash. I guess that explains why they're so passionate about advertising... or not . On a serious note, this debate is way more important than just who gets to control AI tech. It's about how we regulate it and make sure everyone benefits from its power .

I'm keeping an eye on this one . Can't wait to see how it all plays out!