Twitter Purge Goes Awry, Targeting Iconic Account Instead of High-Profile Users
In a move that has left many users confused and frustrated, Elon Musk's Twitter has announced plans to "wind down" blue checks for verified accounts under the old system. The company had promised to stop granting these checks altogether on April 1, prompting high-profile users like the New York Times to prepare for a loss of their coveted badges.
However, in a bizarre twist, it appears that Musk's team has singled out one account instead of the many high-profile users he initially promised to target. The New York Times' main account is the only one to lose its blue check, despite the fact that other prominent accounts such as William Shatner and Monica Lewinsky were vocal about their opposition to paying for verification.
The new label that has been appended to verified accounts makes it unclear whether these users are notable individuals or simply those who have paid to join Twitter Blue. This move has raised concerns among experts in inauthentic behavior, who warn that it could make it easier for people to scam or impersonate high-profile users.
Musk's decision to target one iconic account instead of many high-profile ones is also at odds with his previous claims that he wanted to "treat everyone equally." The move has sparked a backlash against the billionaire, who has long been known for his erratic behavior and tendency to guide decisions on Twitter by whim rather than policy.
The confusion surrounding Twitter's verification system is not new. Musk had previously presented changes to the system as a way of reducing the number of bots on the site, but experts have questioned whether reserving verification for paid users will actually achieve this goal.
As one Twitter user noted, "It seems like there's more going on behind the scenes than just 'treating everyone equally.'" The move has also raised questions about Musk's true intentions and whether he is using his changes to Twitter as a way to drive revenue and consolidate control over the platform.
In a move that has left many users confused and frustrated, Elon Musk's Twitter has announced plans to "wind down" blue checks for verified accounts under the old system. The company had promised to stop granting these checks altogether on April 1, prompting high-profile users like the New York Times to prepare for a loss of their coveted badges.
However, in a bizarre twist, it appears that Musk's team has singled out one account instead of the many high-profile users he initially promised to target. The New York Times' main account is the only one to lose its blue check, despite the fact that other prominent accounts such as William Shatner and Monica Lewinsky were vocal about their opposition to paying for verification.
The new label that has been appended to verified accounts makes it unclear whether these users are notable individuals or simply those who have paid to join Twitter Blue. This move has raised concerns among experts in inauthentic behavior, who warn that it could make it easier for people to scam or impersonate high-profile users.
Musk's decision to target one iconic account instead of many high-profile ones is also at odds with his previous claims that he wanted to "treat everyone equally." The move has sparked a backlash against the billionaire, who has long been known for his erratic behavior and tendency to guide decisions on Twitter by whim rather than policy.
The confusion surrounding Twitter's verification system is not new. Musk had previously presented changes to the system as a way of reducing the number of bots on the site, but experts have questioned whether reserving verification for paid users will actually achieve this goal.
As one Twitter user noted, "It seems like there's more going on behind the scenes than just 'treating everyone equally.'" The move has also raised questions about Musk's true intentions and whether he is using his changes to Twitter as a way to drive revenue and consolidate control over the platform.