Finding Harmony: A King's Vision review – some of Charles's ideas are strangely trippy

Amazon has unleashed a peculiar new documentary on its streaming platform, one that attempts to extol the virtues of none other than the British monarch. "Finding Harmony: A King's Vision" presents itself as a pressing climate crisis exposé, but beneath its earnest façade lies an uncomfortable mess of obsequiousness and dubious assertions.

At 90 minutes, this film feels more like an extended exercise in sycophancy, rather than an urgent exploration of the environmental crisis. The central theme – that King Charles's forward-thinking on issues like organic food and sustainable living somehow proves him to be the "man who built harmony" – is undermined by an overreliance on puff pieces and an evident disregard for skepticism.

Throughout its 90-minute runtime, the film cherry-picks claims from various corners of the king's life and legacy, often without much scrutiny. It's suggested that he foresaw environmental disaster back in the 1960s, yet fails to critically engage with other visionaries like Aldo Leopold or Rachel Carson who also shared similar concerns decades before.

Additionally, some of the content presented feels more like an excerpt from another documentary – such as Adam Curtis's "Bitter Lake" – than genuine insight into the king's philosophies. The inclusion of unsubstantiated theories about the universe and mathematics influencing human emotions raises eyebrows, making one wonder if this film took too many liberties with established scientific principles.

What appears to be the motivation behind Amazon releasing this film is unclear; however, it may simply have been a calculated move to curry favor with influential figures by offering an uncritical profile of them. Regardless of the platform's motives, viewers are left with an intensely frustrating experience that fails to deliver on its premise.

Finding Harmony: A King's Vision can now be streamed on Prime Video, but one can't help but wonder if this film will find itself relegated to obscurity among Amazon's more mainstream content offerings.

Ugh, what a piece of work ... I mean, who makes a doco about the monarch and thinks it's all sunshine and rainbows? It just feels like they're kissing up and not giving us any real substance. And don't even get me started on the cherry-picking of facts - it's like they took some random clips from other docs and mashed them together without a care in the world . I need some actual critical thinking and depth, you know? Not just sycophantic fluff . And what's with the weird stuff about math and emotions and all that jazz... it sounds like they were trying to sneak in some woo-woo nonsense . Give me a break!

I just watched "Finding Harmony: A King's Vision" and I gotta say, it's a real head-scratcher . I'm all for documentaries about the environment and climate change, but this one felt like a bunch of fluff pieces strung together without much substance . The way they cherry-picked the king's claims and glossed over other experts who were working on similar issues decades before just didn't sit right with me . And what's up with all those weird theories about math and emotions? Like, come on guys ! I'm not saying the king isn't interested in environmental issues, but this film felt like a PR stunt more than a genuine documentary . Anyone else watch it?

I gotta say, I'm really underwhelmed by this documentary . It feels like Amazon is trying to spin the monarch into some sort of eco-warrior icon, and it just doesn't hold up to scrutiny. The film's 90 minutes feel like an eternity when you're stuck listening to fluff pieces about the king's supposed environmental vision.

I mean, sure, King Charles has made some decent statements about sustainability and organic living, but come on – he's not the only one who's been advocating for that stuff since the 60s . And what about all the other pioneers like Aldo Leopold and Rachel Carson? Why are they barely mentioned in this film?

And don't even get me started on the weird sciency bits . I'm not sure what kind of magical thinking is going on here, but it's just plain confusing. It feels like Amazon took a bunch of random ideas from Adam Curtis's "Bitter Lake" and mashed them together into something that's supposed to be some sort of profound insight.

To me, this film just seems like an attempt to curry favor with the royal family . I'm not sure what the platform's motivations are, but it definitely feels like a PR stunt. So yeah, if you're looking for a real climate crisis exposé, keep looking – this one's a total letdown .

I'm so done with docu-series that try to spin a king's legacy into some kinda environmental savior story I mean, come on, 90 minutes of puff pieces and cherry-picked claims? Where's the real analysis or even a hint of skepticism? It's like they're trying to give us a feel-good film instead of an actual exposé. And don't even get me started on the maths and universe stuff... what's next, a documentary about monarchs and quantum physics? Watched "Finding Harmony" for 10 minutes and I was already ready to turn it off https://www.primevideo.com/finding-harmony-a-kings-vision

I gotta say, Amazon's move here is pretty suspicious . It looks like they're trying to cash in on the royal family's popularity without doing any real critical thinking about climate change . I mean, who is this film really for? The British monarchy or their American fans? Let's be real, if Amazon wants to make a statement about sustainability, they should be highlighting real heroes like Greta Thunberg or Jane Goodall, not sycophantic profiles of royalty .

It's also interesting how the film glosses over the contributions of other environmentalists who were doing this work decades ago. It smells like a PR stunt to me . As for King Charles's supposed "forward-thinking" on organic food and sustainable living...yeah right . I think we should be critical of anyone claiming to be a leader on environmental issues without providing real evidence or context.

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that Amazon is just trying to boost their platform by offering an uncritical profile of someone with influence . It's like they're saying, "Hey, we've got a famous person, let's make a documentary about them and charge you for it!" Not exactly what we need from our media giants right now .

idk what i just watched lol it felt like amazon wanted to make some royalty fanboy vids and just slapped together whatever claims they could find about king charles. 90 mins of his "harmony" vision feels way too short for a film that tries to be all deep about climate crisis, but at the same time its also kinda hard not to feel bad for them since i guess there's only so much depth you can actually put into something like this

omg I'm so disappointed in this documentary! like I get that we need to talk about climate change and stuff, but this doc feels like a total PR stunt and it's just not fair to the king himself he seems like a genuinely interesting guy, but I don't think we should be fawning over him for his organic food choices newsflash: being eco-friendly isn't new! there are so many other people who've been doing this for decades and it's weird that his forward-thinking on sustainable living gets all the attention. plus can we talk about how they cherry-pick facts from his life without even bothering to fact-check? it's just lazy journalism at its finest

Wow , what's up with these documentaries nowadays? It feels like they just want to make their stars look good and don't care about actual facts or depth. I mean, I love King Charles as much as the next person, but 90 minutes of fluff? That's just too long. Interesting , maybe Amazon was trying to cash in on his popularity or something...

Ugh, what a total waste of time . Like, come on Amazon, you're better than this. This doco is just a glorified puff piece trying to butter up the royal family and make them look all good vibes. Newsflash: it doesn't take much to be sustainable and eco-friendly – just a little common sense would've been nice. And what's with the cherry-picked "facts" and unsubstantiated theories? Sounds like some lazy journalism to me.

And let's be real, if King Charles is supposed to be the poster child for environmentalism, where were his predecessors when it came to addressing climate change? It's all about him being a visionary and all that jazz. Give me a break. The film's just trying to sell us on this narrative without any real depth or critical thinking. And I'm not buying it . Can we please get some more substance in our documentaries, Amazon?

omg you guys amazon is at it again releasing some kinda super weird docu about king charles like what even is this lol i mean i love watching vids about climate change and stuff but this one feels soooo forced like they're trying to make him out as some kinda environmental superhero without actually digging deep into his actual policies the fact that they just cherry pick his organic food and sustainable living vibes without any real criticism is wild. what's up with all these unsubstantiated theories about math and the universe influencing human emotions? it feels like they took some ideas from another doc and just slapped them on this film i don't know if amazon did this for a specific reason but if so it was probably to get some good publicity and curry favor with rich people

I'm so underwhelmed by this docu, you know? I was expecting something more substantial about climate crisis, but it feels like just a feel-good fest for the royal fam . I mean, King Charles is all right, but come on, 90 minutes of fluff pieces? That's not exactly what I'd call "harmony" . And don't even get me started on those wacky theories about math and emotions... like, hello, basic science! . Can't Amazon just give us a real docu on climate change instead? It feels like they're more interested in selling us on the royal brand than actually addressing the pressing issues we need to tackle.

I'm still thinking about how Amazon just dropped this docu and I gotta say it feels like a total PR stunt . They're basically kissing up to the monarchy with this film, trying to make King Charles out as some kinda eco-warrior genius. Newsflash: he's got some good ideas, but come on, 90 minutes of fawning over him? That's just excessive . And what's with the weird parts about the universe and math influencing emotions? Sounds like some New Age nonsense to me . I'm all for exploring the king's views on sustainability, but can't we get a more balanced look at his legacy?

I'm so done with documentaries that feel like they're just trying to butter up the subject . I mean, who is King Charles to be the "man who built harmony"? It feels like a pretty big stretch to me. And yeah, let's be real, Amazon's just trying to get on the royal fan train and get some good PR out of it . I'm not buying it (pun intended) - this whole thing just feels so... soft on its target

omg u guys i just watched this documentary about king charles and like it was soooo weird it was trying to say that he's some kinda environmental hero but really it just felt like they were fawning over him the whole thing was super formulaic and lacking in any real depth or criticism. and omg can we talk about how they cherry picked all these "facts" from his life without actually doing their research i mean come on guys if you're gonna make a documentary about someone's views on climate change then do your due diligence, ya know? i'm still trying to figure out why amazon made this doc and honestly it feels like they just wanted to stroke the king's ego

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple." This documentary feels like a complex web of facts and opinions, woven together with little critical evaluation . The way it presents King Charles's views on the environment without properly contextualizing them or considering alternative perspectives makes for an unbalanced watch.

I just watched this documentary and I gotta say, it's a total mess ! They're trying to spin King Charles as some kinda environmental hero, but it just doesn't add up . The film feels like a bunch of fluff pieces strung together without any real substance or critical thinking . And don't even get me started on the bits about science and math influencing emotions – sounds like they took liberties with some basic principles ! I'm not sure what Amazon's goal was here, but it just comes across as a weak attempt to boost the king's image . Honestly, I'd rather watch grass grow than sit through this again . Definitely won't be recommending this one .

[Image of a confused monkey in front of a royal crown]
[Short clip of King Charles looking awkward while holding a sign that says "Save the Planet"]
[Meme of a documentary with a red X marked through it]
[Image of Aldo Leopold and Rachel Carson standing together, both giving a thumbs down to the camera]

Ugh, I'm so over this doc... it feels like a total PR stunt . I mean, what's up with Amazon trying to cash in on the monarchy vibes? It's just an excuse for them to churn out some fluffy propaganda and get a free pass to say whatever they want without being held accountable . And don't even get me started on how selective the film is – it's like they're cherry-picking the most flattering bits of the king's life while conveniently leaving out all the questionable stuff . I'm not buying it, and neither should you .