NSA detected phone call between foreign intelligence and a person close to Trump

Top US Official Under Fire Over Classified Phone Call Ties to Trump Ally

A highly classified phone call between an individual associated with foreign intelligence and a person close to former President Donald Trump has raised concerns over Washington's national security. According to a whistleblower's attorney, the National Security Agency (NSA) detected evidence of this unusual communication.

The incident, which was brought to the attention of the director of national intelligence (DNI), Tulsi Gabbard, in April, has sparked controversy over Gabbard's handling of classified information. The NSA had flagged the call for review, but rather than releasing the details publicly, Gabbard instructed her chief of staff, Susie Wiles, to deliver a paper copy of the intelligence report directly to Trump.

The DNI's office denied reports that Gabbard took the information out of its normal distribution channels. However, the attorney for the whistleblower claimed that Gabbard had blocked access to highly classified intelligence from routine dispatch and that the director of national intelligence had instructed her not to release it further.

A whistleblower had initially contacted the inspector general in April with concerns over Gabbard's handling of sensitive information. However, after an eight-month review period, acting inspector general Tamara Johnson dismissed the complaint citing a lack of evidence. The case has been referred to Congress, where lawmakers are divided on the legitimacy of the allegations.

Senate and House leaders were briefed on classified details related to the incident last week. While some lawmakers have backed Gabbard's actions as lawful, others have raised concerns over potential attempts to silence whistleblowers.

The incident raises questions about the handling of sensitive information within Washington's intelligence community. The appointment of a partisan official in a key role has also sparked concern about the independence of the inspector general's office.

As investigations into this matter continue, it remains unclear what exactly occurred on that classified phone call and how it impacted national security.

I'm not sure what's more concerning, the fact that someone as high up in the government as Gabbard would be handling classified info like a personal favor or the lack of transparency around what actually went down. Like, if Trump was involved with foreign intel, shouldn't we know who he's been working with? It feels like they're more worried about protecting the people in power rather than national security. And can we talk about how weird it is that a whistleblower got dismissed after 8 months just because they didn't have enough evidence? That doesn't seem right to me...

I'm totally freaked out by this news! Like, can't believe a top US official would just share super sensitive info with Trump's people without even thinking about the implications. What if Russia or China are listening in? It's like, what kind of security breach is that?! I mean, I get it, Tulsi Gabbard might have been trying to help her friend, but did she really think it was a good idea? And why did she block access to the intel report? That just raises more questions!

omg I just got back from vacation and I'm still trying to wrap my head around all this so like what's going on with Tulsi Gabbard and the NSA? isn't she supposed to be protecting national security or something? I mean, if a whistleblower contacted the inspector general in April and nothing happened for 8 months, that just seems kinda fishy to me

and wait, so the DNI's office is saying they didn't do anything wrong, but the attorney for the whistleblower is claiming Gabbard blocked access to classified info? isn't that like a big no-no or something? I'm just trying to understand what's going on here and how this could have happened

and can someone explain to me why this stuff even matters to the general public? I mean, I get it, national security is important and all that, but can't we just focus on more... I don't know, fun things? like did you guys see that new Marvel movie?

this is a total disaster waiting to happen! if gabbard got intel from her allies and shared it with trump, that's like asking for the fox to guard the henhouse . what's next? is she gonna have her own intelligence agency? seriously though, this raises so many questions about how our national security is being handled. we need transparency, not secrecy.

This is getting pretty weird... So, basically, someone close to Trump had a super secret conversation with some foreign spy (or whatever) and now the person in charge of keeping everyone's secrets (the Director of National Intelligence) gave them a special paper copy of the report instead of telling anyone else about it. What's even weirder is that this happened back in April, but only just came to light now... I mean, what were they hiding? And why did the person in charge decide to keep it all under wraps like that?

It's also pretty sketchy that someone basically blocked access to classified info to avoid sharing it with others. That doesn't sound like the kind of thing you want happening in Washington. Like, I get it, there are security protocols and all that, but sometimes transparency is a good thing too... especially when it comes to things that could potentially put national security at risk.

I don't know about you guys, but this whole thing has me really confused. What's the story here? Why did it take so long for anyone to find out? And what does it all mean for the future of intelligence work in Washington?

this whole thing is like, a perfect storm of secrecy and trust ... i mean, think about it, we're talking about a US official having a secret phone call with someone close to Trump, and then they hand over that info directly to him without going through the proper channels ... what's being hidden here? is it really just about national security or is there something more at play? how does this reflect on our society when we value secrecy over transparency so much? and then you got these partisan politics involved, like, the appointment of a partisan official in a key role... what's the real motive here? it's all quite confusing, but one thing is for sure, someone needs to take a step back and re-examine our national security protocols ...

I'm low-key shocked by this whole thing . Like, shouldn't we be more transparent about who's talking to whom, especially when it comes to sensitive info? It seems like Tulsi Gabbard is trying to cover her own backside here and that's just not cool .

And can we talk about the NSA flagging this call for review in the first place? shouldn't they be taking this kind of thing way more seriously? I mean, if there's a foreign intel guy talking to a Trump ally, that's some serious red flags waving around .

It's also wild that the inspector general initially dismissed the whistleblower's complaint and now it's being referred to Congress. Like, what's going on with the accountability in this situation? We need to know more about what happened and who's behind this phone call .

just heard about this top US officials handling is straight up shady Tulsi Gabbard's actions are raising huge concerns over national security and the whistleblower's story has been sat on for 8 months it's like they're trying to cover something up and now Congress is divided on whether she did anything wrong meanwhile, the NSA flagged that call for review but instead of releasing the details publicly, Gabbard told Trump about it straight away what's going on? this whole thing is a huge mess

I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one... So like, Gabbard was supposed to keep some super sensitive info about a classified call between a foreign spy and Trump's buddy under wraps, but instead she just gave it to Trump directly? What's up with that? It seems pretty fishy to me. And now there are all these questions about the NSA's role in this whole thing... did they know what was going on or not? And how did Gabbard even get away with doing her own thing like that?

I'm not buying that Gabbard didn't take any shortcuts with that intel report . I mean, who just delivers a super classified doc to Trump's doorstep? It's like someone is trying to sweep this under the rug and avoid accountability . And what's up with the fact-checking not working out so well for the acting IG? It seems like we're back at square one here...

So like I'm reading this news and my first thought is can't we all just agree to keep things private for once? This whole thing with Gabbard and Trump is getting really weird. Like why did she take that paper copy of the intel report directly to Trump if it's so classified?

And what's up with the NSA flagging the call but not making a big deal about it until now? Wasn't there some kind of security protocol in place or something? I also don't get why Gabbard allegedly blocked access to classified info from her staff. Are we really supposed to believe she's doing everything by the book over here?

This whole thing is just a mess, and it makes me wonder how many other secrets are being kept under wraps in DC And now the inspectors general is saying there wasn't enough evidence? That doesn't sit well with me at all.

The biggest question of all is what exactly happened on that phone call. Did Gabbard's actions put national security at risk or was she just trying to protect her friend Trump? I need more info before I can even begin to form an opinion

I'm like super concerned about this whole thing - it sounds to me like there was a major breach of protocol here! I mean, the director of national intel getting a paper copy of classified info delivered directly to Trump's people? That's some serious red flag waving . And if Congress is divided on whether Gabbard did or didn't do anything wrong... that just adds more fuel to the fire .

We need to get to the bottom of this and make sure our intel community is being run in a way that prioritizes transparency and accountability, you know? It's like, super easy for partisan politics to come into play here, but we can't let that overshadow what's really important: keeping our country safe .

I'm getting a bit worried about this whole thing... as someone who's lived through their fair share of politics, I think it's essential to remember that when you're in a position of power, you have to put the country first, not your personal connections or allegiances. It looks like we might be seeing some serious conflicts of interest here, and that's never a good thing . I'm not sure what to make of Tulsi Gabbard's actions, but it seems like they might have compromised national security for the sake of her friend Trump's interests. That's just not okay... we need to get to the bottom of this and find out what really happened on that phone call .

OMG, can you believe this ?! A top US official is under fire for sharing classified info with a Trump ally... like, what even is going on here? The NSA detected some suspicious activity and the director of national intelligence (DNI) had to intervene because she was just gonna hand over some highly sensitive intel to the wrong person . Like, isn't that a big no-no? And now there are all these questions about whether this is just some partisan politics or if someone's actually trying to compromise national security .

And omg, the whistleblower was basically told to shut up by the acting inspector general after they brought their concerns forward . Like, what kind of system is that? You're supposed to be protecting the country, not silencing people who are speaking out about something shady . Anyway, it's gonna be super interesting to see how this whole thing plays out . Maybe we'll get some answers soon .

like what kinda situation is this? A top US official is under fire over some classified call that's all tied up to Trump... I don't get why they gotta hide the details from the public though - shouldn't we know who's in charge of our intelligence, right? And if it's some shady dealings with a Trump ally... what's gonna happen next? Are there gonna be more leaks or is this just all part of some bigger game? Also, what's up with Congress not being able to get to the bottom of this kinda thing - shouldn't they be the ones figuring out what's really going on?

This is getting serious! If Tulsi Gabbard took the intel report out of normal channels to give it directly to Trump, it raises major red flags about her impartiality. I mean, think about it - if she's willing to go rogue like that over a phone call, what else is she doing behind the scenes?

And let's not forget, this isn't just about Gabbard - it's about the broader culture of politics in Washington. Are we really seeing more and more partisanship bleeding into every aspect of our government? The fact that some lawmakers are backing her actions as "lawful" while others think she's silenced a whistleblower is telling. We need more transparency, not less!

this whole thing is giving me major red flag vibes... like who's supposed to be handling top secret info? Gabbard's actions seem super fishy especially since the NSA detected some shady stuff goin down and now lawmakers are divided on what's legit #NationalSecurityMatters #WhistleblowerProtection #ClassifiedInfoIsNoJoke