Autism Treatment: Leucovorin Raises Concerns Over Lack of Evidence, Potential Side Effects
In a recent announcement, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would soon approve a new treatment for autism in the form of leucovorin, a folate supplement. The proposed therapy is based on research suggesting a potential link between autism and cerebral folate deficiency, but experts are sounding the alarm over the lack of robust evidence supporting its use.
Leucovorin has historically been used to counteract toxic side effects from chemotherapy drugs and treat rare conditions like cerebral folate deficiency (CFD). While it may be effective in addressing some symptoms associated with CFD, which shares similarities with autism, its application for treating autism is far more speculative. The FDA's decision to label leucovorin as a treatment for CFD, but not explicitly for autism, highlights the uncertainty surrounding this therapy.
Pediatric neurologists specializing in autism and other conditions warn that relying on an unproven treatment could lead to negative outcomes. "The idea of doing this for everyone—we're going to see side effects, we're going to see negative outcomes," says Audrey Brumback, a pediatric neurologist at UT Health Austin.
Critics point out that the research supporting leucovorin's effectiveness in treating autism is remarkably thin and has faced scrutiny from scientists. A recent trial testing leucovorin supplements in children with autism was retracted due to statistical inconsistencies. The largest study on the subject, which included 77 children, also failed to demonstrate conclusive evidence.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends against routine use of leucovorin for autism, citing concerns about potential side effects and lack of substantial data supporting its efficacy. However, some families may still be drawn to this treatment, often due to misinformation or a desire to try anything that might help their child.
As the debate surrounding leucovorin intensifies, experts emphasize the need for rigorous scientific inquiry and evidence-based approaches in addressing autism treatment options. "To have autism is not to be pitied; it's not to be seen as something that a family should be embarrassed about—it's part of life," says Dr. Brumback.
The future of autism treatment remains uncertain, with many experts expressing skepticism about the potential benefits of leucovorin. While some researchers are optimistic about developing effective behavioral interventions for autism, others caution against relying on unproven therapies that may cause harm. As the search for reliable treatments continues, it is essential to prioritize evidence-based approaches and support families in their quest for quality care and understanding.
In a recent announcement, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would soon approve a new treatment for autism in the form of leucovorin, a folate supplement. The proposed therapy is based on research suggesting a potential link between autism and cerebral folate deficiency, but experts are sounding the alarm over the lack of robust evidence supporting its use.
Leucovorin has historically been used to counteract toxic side effects from chemotherapy drugs and treat rare conditions like cerebral folate deficiency (CFD). While it may be effective in addressing some symptoms associated with CFD, which shares similarities with autism, its application for treating autism is far more speculative. The FDA's decision to label leucovorin as a treatment for CFD, but not explicitly for autism, highlights the uncertainty surrounding this therapy.
Pediatric neurologists specializing in autism and other conditions warn that relying on an unproven treatment could lead to negative outcomes. "The idea of doing this for everyone—we're going to see side effects, we're going to see negative outcomes," says Audrey Brumback, a pediatric neurologist at UT Health Austin.
Critics point out that the research supporting leucovorin's effectiveness in treating autism is remarkably thin and has faced scrutiny from scientists. A recent trial testing leucovorin supplements in children with autism was retracted due to statistical inconsistencies. The largest study on the subject, which included 77 children, also failed to demonstrate conclusive evidence.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends against routine use of leucovorin for autism, citing concerns about potential side effects and lack of substantial data supporting its efficacy. However, some families may still be drawn to this treatment, often due to misinformation or a desire to try anything that might help their child.
As the debate surrounding leucovorin intensifies, experts emphasize the need for rigorous scientific inquiry and evidence-based approaches in addressing autism treatment options. "To have autism is not to be pitied; it's not to be seen as something that a family should be embarrassed about—it's part of life," says Dr. Brumback.
The future of autism treatment remains uncertain, with many experts expressing skepticism about the potential benefits of leucovorin. While some researchers are optimistic about developing effective behavioral interventions for autism, others caution against relying on unproven therapies that may cause harm. As the search for reliable treatments continues, it is essential to prioritize evidence-based approaches and support families in their quest for quality care and understanding.
leucovorin thingy... i dont know if im comfortable with this 
its like they want to try something new without proof? 
i mean, autism is a tough one to tackle anyway... all these different opinions on it are kinda overwhelming 
. some people think it could help, but others say its just gonna cause more problems 
and the FDA is moving forward with it without enough evidence 
thats not cool imo 
need more research and less speculation 
. I mean, I get it, parents just wanna try anything to help their kids, but we gotta be careful here. We can't just jump into something that's gonna potentially harm our kiddos without solid evidence, you feel? It's like, what happened with the trial that got retracted? That don't sit right with me 
. We need to prioritize evidence-based approaches and support families in finding reliable treatments that don't put our kids at risk 
. It's not about pitying autism; it's about finding effective solutions that actually work 
.
. We need to be supporting research that's actually going to help us understand and treat autism properly, not just relying on speculation and rumors 
.
I MEAN, I FEEL SORRY FOR THE PARENTS WHO ARE DESPERATELY TRYING TO HELP THEIR KIDS, BUT WE NEED TO BE RESPONSIBLE HERE! 
THE FDA SHOULD BE MORE CAREFUL BEFORE APPROVING ANY NEW TREATMENT, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT COULD POTENTIALLY HARM KIDS. 
i was trying to get her to take this weird medicine that looked like leucovorin lol anyway back to this autism thing... i don't get why they're so worried about it? isn't it better than nothing? but then again i'm not a doctor and i don't know what's good for anyone 
. I mean, we need to be supporting our kids with autism, not risking their health with untested treatments 
.
.
. I mean, it's great that there are so many families searching for effective treatments, but 64% of them might be misinformed about the risks and benefits 
.
.
That doesn't sit right with me. And what's up with families seeking out this treatment when there's no concrete evidence to back it up? It's like they're trying to gamble their kid's health 
. We need more solid studies before we start dishing out unproven treatments. The AAP is on the money saying we should avoid routine use of leucovorin for autism.
What works for one kid might not work for another. We need more research and evidence before we start administering leucovorin to everyone 
... but at least we're having this conversation, which is a good start 
.
.
. Let's focus on supporting families in their quest for quality care and understanding, rather than just throwing around unproven treatments 
.
I can only imagine how scared these parents must feel with all this uncertainty about what might help their child 
.
. and let's not forget, every child is different 