OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is pushing back against his rival Anthropic's latest move, releasing a scathing Super Bowl ad that pokes fun at OpenAI's decision to introduce ads into ChatGPT. In an X post, Altman fired back, calling out Anthropic for serving "an expensive product to rich people," in stark contrast to OpenAI's effort to make powerful AI accessible to everyone.
The spat between the two A.I. heavyweights highlights their competing visions for the future of artificial intelligence. While OpenAI is doubling down on its push into the enterprise A.I. market, with new platform Frontier and coding assistant Codex, Anthropic has carved out a strong niche serving wealthy clients through its Claude Code, which achieved $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue just six months after its launch.
The divide between the two companies comes as no surprise given their past differences on safety concerns and business models. Dario Amodei, Anthropic's CEO, left OpenAI in 2020 over disagreements with Altman on those issues. Today, Anthropic is valued at $350 billion, while OpenAI has a valuation of $500 billion.
The tension between the two companies also plays out in their respective user bases and revenue streams. While OpenAI relies on consumers for more than 60% of its revenue, Anthropic draws 85% of its revenue from enterprise clients. In terms of consumer offerings, both companies have direct competition with similar monthly plans, ranging from $8 to $200.
In a bid to reclaim popular sentiment, Altman has framed his decision to introduce ads into ChatGPT as one that will democratize technology and bring A.I. to billions of people who can't afford pricey subscription plans. Meanwhile, Anthropic is pushing back with its own Super Bowl campaign, which the OpenAI CEO describes as an attempt by the company to "control what people do with A.I."
With the stakes high, both companies are racing to capture market share and control the narrative around AI's future. As they compete in the public square, it remains to be seen who will come out on top – but one thing is certain: the battle for A.I. supremacy has only just begun.
The spat between the two A.I. heavyweights highlights their competing visions for the future of artificial intelligence. While OpenAI is doubling down on its push into the enterprise A.I. market, with new platform Frontier and coding assistant Codex, Anthropic has carved out a strong niche serving wealthy clients through its Claude Code, which achieved $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue just six months after its launch.
The divide between the two companies comes as no surprise given their past differences on safety concerns and business models. Dario Amodei, Anthropic's CEO, left OpenAI in 2020 over disagreements with Altman on those issues. Today, Anthropic is valued at $350 billion, while OpenAI has a valuation of $500 billion.
The tension between the two companies also plays out in their respective user bases and revenue streams. While OpenAI relies on consumers for more than 60% of its revenue, Anthropic draws 85% of its revenue from enterprise clients. In terms of consumer offerings, both companies have direct competition with similar monthly plans, ranging from $8 to $200.
In a bid to reclaim popular sentiment, Altman has framed his decision to introduce ads into ChatGPT as one that will democratize technology and bring A.I. to billions of people who can't afford pricey subscription plans. Meanwhile, Anthropic is pushing back with its own Super Bowl campaign, which the OpenAI CEO describes as an attempt by the company to "control what people do with A.I."
With the stakes high, both companies are racing to capture market share and control the narrative around AI's future. As they compete in the public square, it remains to be seen who will come out on top – but one thing is certain: the battle for A.I. supremacy has only just begun.
. Sam Altman's response felt a bit too defensive, imo 
. Like, yeah, we get it, you're trying to make AI accessible to everyone 
, but the way Anthropic is pushing back feels like they're more focused on serving the rich and powerful 
. OpenAI's move might just be a clever ploy to bring in those consumer dollars 
, but if Anthropic can keep raking it in from enterprise clients, they're golden 
. The game is on, and I'm here for it 
!
, this whole ad thing between OpenAI and Anthropic is getting crazy! 
.
. But at the same time, we've got to be careful about how we're using this tech - safety concerns are real, folks! 
. But one thing's for sure: it's not just about the money - it's about changing lives and making a real difference 
.
. like i get openai's vision of making AI for everyone but $200 a month feels way too expensive for most ppl lol. anthropic's rich clients thing does sound shady tho 
. and idk about altman's whole "democratizing tech" vibe, seems kinda tone-deaf considering ppl are still struggling with basic necessities let alone afford fancy AI subs 
. And let's be real, $8 to $200 monthly plans are still super out of reach for most people 
sam altman's callout of anthropic for charging rich people more is straight fire 
frontier and codex are about to take enterprise ai by storm, mark my words 
. Like, who tries to one-up each other during the Super Bowl? It's just gonna look bad to everyone else 
. Maybe a middle ground would be better? Like, what about free trials or student plans? That way you get to showcase your tech without being super exploitative 
... On another note, $350 billion for Anthropic vs $500 billion for OpenAI is wild 
.
. At the end of the day, it's all about finding that sweet spot where tech can benefit people from all walks of life 
.
!
and btw, anthropic's valuation is kinda wild $350 billion? that's like, whoa 
I'm so excited about this AI rivalry! It's awesome that OpenAI is pushing to make AI accessible to everyone 
! And can we talk about how fascinating it is to see these two A.I. heavyweights going head-to-head in the Super Bowl ads 
!