"Landmark Trial Exposes Dark Secrets Behind Social Media Companies' Handling of Children"
A significant trial has begun in Los Angeles County Superior Court, with Meta and Google facing allegations that their platforms are designed to addict children, exacerbating depression and suicidal thoughts. The case centers around a 19-year-old plaintiff, identified only as "KGM," whose story could determine the outcome for thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies.
The trial's opening statements painted a stark picture of the companies' alleged negligence in protecting young users. Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs' attorney, claimed that Meta and Google are "two of the richest corporations in history" that have "engineered addiction in children's brains." He cited internal documents showing that the companies target young audiences with explicit references to boost profits.
Lanier drew comparisons between the social media giants and tobacco firms, highlighting the use of manipulative design features aimed at maximizing youth engagement. He also emphasized how social validation is crucial for teenagers, saying that Facebook and Instagram "engineered a feature that caters to a minor's craving for social validation."
The trial will last around eight weeks, with executives from Meta and Google expected to testify. The outcome could have profound effects on their businesses and how they handle children using their platforms.
Meanwhile, other countries are taking steps to regulate social media use among children. France has approved a bill banning social media for children under 15, while Australia has revoked access to over 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to minors since the country banned use of the platforms by those under 16.
As the trial unfolds, it will be crucial to examine whether Meta and Google are held accountable for their alleged negligence in protecting young users. The case raises important questions about the role of social media companies in shaping children's mental health and wellbeing.
A significant trial has begun in Los Angeles County Superior Court, with Meta and Google facing allegations that their platforms are designed to addict children, exacerbating depression and suicidal thoughts. The case centers around a 19-year-old plaintiff, identified only as "KGM," whose story could determine the outcome for thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies.
The trial's opening statements painted a stark picture of the companies' alleged negligence in protecting young users. Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs' attorney, claimed that Meta and Google are "two of the richest corporations in history" that have "engineered addiction in children's brains." He cited internal documents showing that the companies target young audiences with explicit references to boost profits.
Lanier drew comparisons between the social media giants and tobacco firms, highlighting the use of manipulative design features aimed at maximizing youth engagement. He also emphasized how social validation is crucial for teenagers, saying that Facebook and Instagram "engineered a feature that caters to a minor's craving for social validation."
The trial will last around eight weeks, with executives from Meta and Google expected to testify. The outcome could have profound effects on their businesses and how they handle children using their platforms.
Meanwhile, other countries are taking steps to regulate social media use among children. France has approved a bill banning social media for children under 15, while Australia has revoked access to over 4.7 million accounts identified as belonging to minors since the country banned use of the platforms by those under 16.
As the trial unfolds, it will be crucial to examine whether Meta and Google are held accountable for their alleged negligence in protecting young users. The case raises important questions about the role of social media companies in shaping children's mental health and wellbeing.