NY Democratic House Candidate Works for Palantir Partners Pushing AI Border Surveillance

A Democrat running for a House seat in New York has ties to companies that sell technology used by the government for border surveillance and military projects. Cait Conley, who served as national security adviser under President Joe Biden, is one of several candidates vying for the 17th Congressional District seat. Her campaign financial disclosures show she earned over $80,000 from two defense contractors, Primer and Hidden Level, both partners with Palantir.

Conley's connections to these companies raise questions about how she might approach policy sectors in Congress. Albert Fox Cahn, a civil rights attorney, expressed concerns that Conley's ties to the tech industry could impact her approach to issues like surveillance and artificial intelligence.

The 17th Congressional District is a top priority for Democrats, who lost it to Republicans in the 2022 midterms. The seat is considered a swing district, with Conley walking a fine line on issues of immigration and national security. She has blasted Trump's deployment of the military to U.S. cities and criticized immigration agents for killing protesters.

Conley has received donations from outside the district, several from defense and tech companies. Her campaign has been criticized for not disclosing her job at Primer, despite earning over $80,000 in consulting fees. The candidate has claimed she will be a leader in Congress who includes working Americans in AI policy growth.

I dont no why cant politicians just be honest about their jobs? Cait Conley didnt disclose her income from defense contractors and its already causin concern... like whats the diff between her doing work for Primer or Palantir, and them being a huge part of what they r sayin in congress? AI policy is supposed to b about people's rights, not just profit...

i dont think this is good news! if cait conley gets elected she's gonna have some major conflicts of interest on her hands . i mean, she's got ties to defense contractors and palantir which are all about government surveillance and military tech... its just not right that someone in a position of power has that kind of influence over policy . it feels like she's gonna have to choose between doing what's best for her constituents or doing what's good for her campaign donors . thats just too much pressure!

I've got some concerns about this candidate, Cait Conley. It seems like all these connections to defense contractors and Palantir are gonna influence how she votes on surveillance and AI policies. I get it, her past experience is valuable, but shouldn't that info be clear right from the start? Not disclosing your consulting fee job at Primer? That's not exactly transparency, you know? She talks about being a leader for working Americans, but what if those defense companies have different interests in mind? It's like she's got her foot in both camps. We need to be careful who we trust with these powerful tech and security issues.

This is super interesting . I mean, we're talking about a major candidate in a swing district and it turns out her background is pretty intertwined with the defense tech industry . It's not just about her past job as Biden's national security adviser, but also the fact that she's got ties to companies like Palantir that do work for the government on border surveillance and military projects .

I'm not sure how this plays out in a congressional campaign, to be honest . If she is elected and has those connections, could it influence her stance on issues like surveillance and AI? It's definitely a concern for civil rights groups like Albert Fox Cahn mentioned in the article .

At the same time, I do think it's worth noting that Conley is also someone who criticized Trump's deployment of troops to cities and advocated for more inclusive immigration policies . So, it's not all black and white here . The campaign finance disclosure issue is a problem though - if she was being transparent about her work at Primer, maybe this wouldn't be an issue .

omg, great, just what we need - another politician with sweet ties to the surveillance state . like, i get it, the government needs tech for border patrol and all that jazz... but do we really want someone who's essentially selling us our own security on a silver platter?

i mean, cait conley seems like a solid candidate and all, but her connections to these defense contractors are major red flags . it's like she's trying to buy her way into congress with some sweet defense contract cash . and what about all the protests she's blasted Trump on? now that she's running for office, does she get a free pass to vote however she wants?

and let's be real, her campaign has been pretty sketchy... hiding her job at primer and all that . seems like she's trying to keep some skeletons in the closet from coming out of the woodwork . anyhoo, we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out... fingers crossed she doesn't become a tool for the same people she's fighting against

can't believe this is a thing - Cait Conley wants to represent our 17th Congressional District but she's basically got her hand out for defense contractors like, what's good about that? shouldn't we want someone who truly fights for us, not just some fat paychecks? I'm all for being business-friendly and stuff, but when it comes down to it, I wanna know my rep is gonna speak up for the little guy, not the big corps her whole approach seems kinda shady, if you ask me

I'm low-key worried about Cait Conley's ties to these defense contractors . Like, if she does end up in Congress, how's she gonna push for the rights of everyday people? I mean, her friends at Primer and Hidden Level are getting paid handsomely by the government for border surveillance tech... it's a bit suspicious, you know? And with Palantir involved too, that's like, a major player in AI surveillance - what's gonna change?

idk about this cait conley chick her ties to defense contractors are sketchy like what's good with having connections to ppl who make tech for border surveillance and military projects? shouldn't she be out there fightin for the little guy instead of just bein a puppet 4 the big corps

just wondering if it's weird that someone running for congress is super connected to companies that make surveillance tech... seems like they'd wanna create some distance from that kinda stuff conley's got a tough road ahead, especially with her ties to palantir - does she think she can really make a difference on issues like AI and surveillance? also curious how the whole 'not disclosing her job at primer' thing plays out - seems shady

Ugh , another politician with ties to big defense contracts . Cait Conley's connections to Palantir and other surveillance tech firms are really concerning . It's like, how can we trust her on issues of immigration and national security when she's profiting off the same systems that track and control people? Not cool, dude . And don't even get me started on the lack of transparency in her campaign finances... what else is she hiding?

I'm not buying this whole 'Cait Conley for Congress' thing... I mean, come on, she's got ties to these super shady defense contractors that are literally making our gov use their tech for border surveillance and military projects . Like, what's her angle? Is she gonna be all like "surveillance is cool" or what? And then there's this whole thing with her not disclosing her job at Primer... that just screams red flag to me . I get it, she's trying to win over the swing district, but can't she just be honest about who she is and where her money comes from? It feels like she's already playing both sides against each other .

I'm thinking about Cait Conley's campaign... She seems to have some pretty interesting connections with defense contractors It's making me wonder if her views on surveillance and AI might be influenced by those relationships How will she balance her own stance on these issues with the interests of companies that stand to gain from them?

omg, can you believe this? Cait Conley is running for House seat in NY and her campaign financials are literally sketchy She's got ties to defense contractors and Palantir (ugh, that name sounds soooo shady ) and people are worried she'll take a pro-surveillance stance if she gets into Congress And what's up with her campaign not disclosing her job at Primer? Like, shouldn't that be on the table? I get that she wants to be a leader who includes working Americans in AI policy growth, but you've got to wonder if those connections will sway her decisions

I mean, it's a swing district and Conley is trying to walk this fine line between immigration and national security issues, but this whole thing just feels like a big ol' red flag Does anyone know what her stance is on surveillance? Are they gonna get caught in the crossfire of AI growth?