Texas Files Appeal with US Supreme Court After Federal Judges Block New Congressional Map
In a move that could potentially alter the electoral landscape of Texas, federal judges have blocked the state's newly drawn congressional map, citing concerns over racial gerrymandering. The decision has sparked widespread reaction among state leaders and lawmakers.
The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of striking down the map, which was designed to preserve a Republican majority in the House of Representatives for the next year's midterm elections. Democrats, who were facing the prospect of being squeezed out of representation under the original map, have welcomed the ruling as a victory.
Under the map at issue, Democrats would have been forced into a "game of political musical chairs," with some members set to retire or face primary challenges. However, the federal judges' decision means that this may no longer be the case.
The judges found substantial evidence to support their claim that Texas had racially gerrymandered the 2025 map, which is illegal under federal law. They also cited a U.S. Department of Justice letter to Governor Greg Abbott from July, warning that four coalition districts made up of Blacks and Latinos must be dismantled and redrawn.
The DOJ's letter targeted only majority non-white districts, with no mention of majority white districts. This raised suspicions among the judges, who concluded that the real motive behind the map was partisan rather than racial.
Governor Abbott has slammed the decision as "clearly erroneous" and vowed to appeal to the US Supreme Court. The state filed its appeal late on Tuesday afternoon, sparking a further round of reaction from lawmakers.
Democrat Rep. Julie Johnson praised the ruling, saying that the attempt by Republicans to disenfranchise voters of color was "egregious". Fellow Democrat Rep. Marc Veasey echoed her sentiments, saying that the court's decision showed that he and other Democrats were on solid legal ground.
On the other hand, Republicans have criticized the judges' decision as wrong and expressed their confidence in the US Supreme Court to review the matter.
One Republican candidate for attorney general, Aaron Reitz, claimed that the map was designed to draw more Republican seats, which is why they will ultimately win. Fellow candidate State Senator Mayes Middleton echoed this view, saying that the map is partisan and will help Republicans secure victory.
The ruling has significant implications for next year's midterm elections, with Rep. Johnson and Rep. Veasey announcing plans to run in their respective districts despite the change.
In a move that could potentially alter the electoral landscape of Texas, federal judges have blocked the state's newly drawn congressional map, citing concerns over racial gerrymandering. The decision has sparked widespread reaction among state leaders and lawmakers.
The three-judge panel ruled 2-1 in favor of striking down the map, which was designed to preserve a Republican majority in the House of Representatives for the next year's midterm elections. Democrats, who were facing the prospect of being squeezed out of representation under the original map, have welcomed the ruling as a victory.
Under the map at issue, Democrats would have been forced into a "game of political musical chairs," with some members set to retire or face primary challenges. However, the federal judges' decision means that this may no longer be the case.
The judges found substantial evidence to support their claim that Texas had racially gerrymandered the 2025 map, which is illegal under federal law. They also cited a U.S. Department of Justice letter to Governor Greg Abbott from July, warning that four coalition districts made up of Blacks and Latinos must be dismantled and redrawn.
The DOJ's letter targeted only majority non-white districts, with no mention of majority white districts. This raised suspicions among the judges, who concluded that the real motive behind the map was partisan rather than racial.
Governor Abbott has slammed the decision as "clearly erroneous" and vowed to appeal to the US Supreme Court. The state filed its appeal late on Tuesday afternoon, sparking a further round of reaction from lawmakers.
Democrat Rep. Julie Johnson praised the ruling, saying that the attempt by Republicans to disenfranchise voters of color was "egregious". Fellow Democrat Rep. Marc Veasey echoed her sentiments, saying that the court's decision showed that he and other Democrats were on solid legal ground.
On the other hand, Republicans have criticized the judges' decision as wrong and expressed their confidence in the US Supreme Court to review the matter.
One Republican candidate for attorney general, Aaron Reitz, claimed that the map was designed to draw more Republican seats, which is why they will ultimately win. Fellow candidate State Senator Mayes Middleton echoed this view, saying that the map is partisan and will help Republicans secure victory.
The ruling has significant implications for next year's midterm elections, with Rep. Johnson and Rep. Veasey announcing plans to run in their respective districts despite the change.