The international community appears to want to move on from the devastating conflict in Gaza, but Palestinians can't afford to let go just yet. Despite a fragile ceasefire, hundreds have lost their lives and thousands more are struggling with the aftermath of two years of war.
The World Health Organization has warned that the health catastrophe in Gaza will be felt for generations, while aid organizations are finding it impossible to deliver essential supplies due to Israeli restrictions. The situation is particularly dire for children, who are being forced to sleep on bare ground in sewage-soaked clothing.
A recent US proposal has sparked widespread criticism, with a plan to divide Gaza into a "green zone" under international control and a "red zone" left in ruins. This vision is eerily reminiscent of disastrous US policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the pursuit of stability was often achieved at the expense of local communities.
The UN security council resolution endorsing Donald Trump's peace proposals has been hailed by some as a breakthrough, but it falls short on key issues. The references to Palestinian statehood and Israeli withdrawal are vague and conditional, leaving many to wonder what they might actually mean in practice.
Critics argue that this is little more than a ploy for governments to salve their consciences and burnish their reputations, rather than a genuine attempt to address the plight of Palestinians. Germany's decision to resume weapons exports to Israel is just one example of how some countries are choosing to look the other way.
As Palestinian commentator Nathan Brown warns, "what looked like a forever war may be metamorphosing into forever misery." The international community must do better than this. Countries that were complicit in a genocidal war have a duty to demand real change and genuine justice for Palestinians. Anything less is a betrayal of the very principles of human rights and dignity that we claim to uphold.
The World Health Organization has warned that the health catastrophe in Gaza will be felt for generations, while aid organizations are finding it impossible to deliver essential supplies due to Israeli restrictions. The situation is particularly dire for children, who are being forced to sleep on bare ground in sewage-soaked clothing.
A recent US proposal has sparked widespread criticism, with a plan to divide Gaza into a "green zone" under international control and a "red zone" left in ruins. This vision is eerily reminiscent of disastrous US policies in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the pursuit of stability was often achieved at the expense of local communities.
The UN security council resolution endorsing Donald Trump's peace proposals has been hailed by some as a breakthrough, but it falls short on key issues. The references to Palestinian statehood and Israeli withdrawal are vague and conditional, leaving many to wonder what they might actually mean in practice.
Critics argue that this is little more than a ploy for governments to salve their consciences and burnish their reputations, rather than a genuine attempt to address the plight of Palestinians. Germany's decision to resume weapons exports to Israel is just one example of how some countries are choosing to look the other way.
As Palestinian commentator Nathan Brown warns, "what looked like a forever war may be metamorphosing into forever misery." The international community must do better than this. Countries that were complicit in a genocidal war have a duty to demand real change and genuine justice for Palestinians. Anything less is a betrayal of the very principles of human rights and dignity that we claim to uphold.