Publicly owned intercity bus station offers dignity for travelers on tight budgets

A Publicly Owned Inter city Bus Station: A Beacon of Dignity for Budget-Conscious Travelers

For years, Chicago's intercity bus station has been a topic of uncertainty. But now, the city plans to buy and renovate it - a move that's being hailed as good news by advocates who have long called for a publicly owned station.

The idea is no longer radical, given that we already have public facilities for air travel and rail passengers. What people traveling by bus deserve is the same level of dignity and respect. Chicago's station is a major hub for Midwestern bus travel and a transfer point between planes, trains, and automobiles. Greyhound operates a peak of 82 buses daily, carrying over 500,000 passengers annually - more than many publicly owned airports in Illinois.

The problem is that some bus companies can't afford to use the nearby curbs because they're not affiliated with Greyhound. A publicly owned station would centralize all bus service into one convenient hub, supporting travelers while reducing local impacts.

Intercity bus travel is a lifeline for many people. It's especially crucial for those who rely on buses due to financial constraints - two-thirds of intercity bus riders have incomes below $40,000, and one-third have incomes below $20,000. The station also serves as a vital transportation option for women seeking reproductive health care, LGBTQ residents fleeing persecution, and domestic violence survivors.

But the trend isn't just about providing essential services; it's also about sustainability. Taking the bus is an environmentally friendly way to travel, with every bus rider reducing carbon emissions by four to five times compared to flying or driving. We can't afford to add more cars to our roads or emissions to our air.

The cost of buying and renovating a whole block of land for $50 million seems like a bargain, especially when compared to the costs of major transit, airport, and highway improvements. The return on investment will be significant, generating benefits not just for the city but also for the region.

As we head into the busy holiday travel season, affordable and accessible bus service is more crucial than ever. It's time for Chicago to show its commitment to public transportation by investing in a publicly owned intercity bus station - a move that would put the city on par with other major metropolitan areas.
 
I just saw this thread from like 2 days ago and I'm surprised it's not more popular πŸ€”. Anyways, I think it's a no-brainer to invest in a publicly owned intercity bus station in Chicago. It makes sense that we have public facilities for air travel and rail passengers, so why not buses too? Greyhound already has a huge presence at the station, so it wouldn't be hard to centralize all bus service into one hub.

I'm also loving the environmental benefits of taking the bus - it's so much better than flying or driving. And let's be real, some people can't afford cars, so buses are literally a lifeline for them πŸš—. It's about time Chicago steps up and invests in public transportation that everyone can use.

I mean, $50 million might seem like a lot, but think about all the money it'll save the city in the long run by reducing carbon emissions and whatnot. Plus, it's just a cool idea to have a publicly owned station that serves everyone, not just the wealthy or those with connections πŸš‚.
 
I think it's low-key awesome that Chicago is finally considering buying and renovating their own intercity bus station πŸšŒπŸ‘. I mean, we already have public airports and train stations, so why not buses too? It makes total sense to have all the different modes of transportation under one roof - it'll be way more convenient for travelers and reduce traffic congestion in the area πŸš—πŸ’¨. Plus, it's a win-win for the environment since taking the bus is literally way better for the planet 😊. $50 million might seem like a lot upfront, but trust me, it'll pay off in the long run πŸ’Έ.
 
πŸ€” I'm not entirely convinced this is a straightforward win-win situation πŸ€‘. While it sounds great to have all bus services under one roof, what about private companies like Greyhound who are already making it work just fine? Will they be forced out by public ownership? And what's the plan for maintenance costs? Who's going to foot those bills? πŸ’Έ Need some info on the proposed business model before I get on board πŸš‚.
 
🚌 The fact that a publicly owned intercity bus station is being considered in Chicago is a huge step forward πŸš€ for budget-conscious travelers πŸ‘₯. I think it's high time we give our bus riders the same level of dignity and respect as rail and air passengers ✈️. Greyhound already operates a massive number of buses daily, so why not centralize all services under one roof 🏒? It'd be a game-changer for those who can't afford flying or driving, especially low-income folks 🀝. Plus, taking the bus is super eco-friendly 🌿, which is a win-win for our environment 🌎. With $50 million investment, we're talking about a solid ROI πŸ’Έ and major benefits for the city and region πŸŒ†. Can't wait to see this project move forward πŸš‚!
 
πŸš‚πŸ‘ The city's plan to buy and renovate the intercity bus station is a huge win for budget-conscious travelers! It's about time we started treating public transportation with the same dignity as air travel or rail services. I mean, who doesn't love hopping on a comfy Greyhound bus after a long day? 😊 The benefits go beyond just convenience - it's also super eco-friendly, which is essential for our planet's well-being. Plus, it'd be great to see more affordable options for low-income folks and those seeking reproductive health care or fleeing persecution. The $50 million price tag seems like a steal considering the long-term savings on emissions and road infrastructure. Can't wait to see this project come to life! πŸ’š
 
omg, finally! someone's talking about this πŸšŒπŸ’Ό. can u believe greyhound has 82 buses daily and still has to deal w/ curbs? it's like they're being held back by their own greed πŸ€‘. a publicly owned station would be a game changer for low-income folks who rely on buses, plus it'd reduce emissions and carbon footprint πŸŒΏπŸ’š. $50 million might seem like a lot, but think about all the money we waste on airports and highways that don't even come close to being as efficient πŸ’Έ. it's time for chicago to step up its public transit game!
 
πŸšŒπŸ’š I'm all about this! A publicly owned intercity bus station in Chicago is like, totally necessary πŸ’―. We need to prioritize people's dignity and respect when it comes to transportation options. And let's be real, taking the bus is so much better for the environment 🌎. The stats on carbon emissions are wild - I mean, who doesn't want to reduce their carbon footprint? πŸ’š Plus, it's not just about sustainability; it's also about supporting those who need affordable transportation the most. Like, women seeking reproductive health care and domestic violence survivors... πŸ€— this is so important! Let's get behind this initiative and make Chicago a leader in public transportation 🌟.
 
I think it's super cool that Chicago is finally gonna get a new, publicly owned bus station! πŸšŒπŸ’‘ I mean, who wouldn't want to travel around the Midwest without having to worry about where they can park their car? It's like, back in the day, we had public airports and train stations, so why not buses too? Greyhound already has like, a ton of buses coming through there every day... 500k passengers or whatever? That's crazy! And it's not just about getting people from point A to point B, it's also about being eco-friendly. Taking the bus is way better for the environment than driving or flying, so let's hope this new station helps reduce all that pollution... We should be able to afford this kinda thing! $50 million isn't too steep if you think about how much money we're gonna save on gas and flights in the long run...
 
πŸš‚πŸ’° I'm low-key hyped about this! Did you know that if we were to invest $50M in a new bus station, it'd be like getting 1000 new buses 🚌 for the roads? And with 500k passengers using Greyhound daily, that's like 5.4 billion miles driven per year... but without all those cars on the road, we could cut emissions by over 1.2 million tons! 🌎 That's like taking every car off the road in Chicago (for a sec). And if we're talking sustainability, let's look at these stats: the US has over 250k buses running around the country, but only about 5% of them are even remotely 'eco-friendly' πŸ’š. So yeah, this public bus station idea is looking up! πŸ“ˆ
 
I'm not sure about this new plan for Chicago's bus station πŸ€”. I mean, it sounds nice and all, but is it just a way to prop up Greyhound? Like, what happens to the smaller bus companies if they can't compete with a publicly owned hub? And what about the maintenance costs? $50 million seems like a lot of money for a renovation project... especially considering we're already seeing major tech firms move into the city and driving up housing costs πŸ€‘. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but let's not get ahead of ourselves here. It's just one more thing to consider when evaluating the pros and cons of this proposal 😐.
 
πŸšŒπŸ’• I can totally feel how frustrating it must be for people who rely on buses due to financial constraints. Having a dignified space for them to travel is just basic human rights, you know? πŸ€— And let's not forget about the environmental benefits - every bus rider does play a part in reducing our carbon footprint 😊. $50 million might seem like a lot, but think of all the people it could help and the positive impact it would have on the city's air quality πŸ’¨. Plus, it's not just about the financials; it's about showing that we care about our citizens' well-being 🌟.
 
OMG, can't believe it's finally happening 🀩! A publicly owned bus station in Chicago sounds like a total game-changer for budget-conscious travelers. I mean, we already have airports and train stations getting all fancy, so why not buses too? It's about time they gave us some dignity on our travels πŸšŒπŸ’Ό. And can you believe the stats on who relies on buses - women seeking reproductive health care, LGBTQ folks fleeing persecution, domestic violence survivors... it's like, hello Chicago, let's get with the times! 😊 Sustainability is also a major win here. Let's reduce those carbon emissions and make our city (and the world) a better place 🌎. $50 million seems like a steal compared to what we're already spending on other infrastructure projects. It's all about making Chicago a beacon for affordable, accessible travel - let's do this! πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸš— I'm not sure why we need to make such a big deal about this. I mean, it's just a bus station, right? πŸ˜’ But seriously, $50 million sounds like a lot of cash for just renovating a block. What's the ROI gonna be, exactly? πŸ€‘ And what about all the bus companies that aren't affiliated with Greyhound? How are they supposed to fit into this new system? It seems like a logistical nightmare waiting to happen... 😬
 
OMG u gotta be kiddin me! πŸ™„ A publicly owned bus station is like, totally overdue in Chi Town. It's about time we give our bus riders some dignity and respect. I mean, think about it - we got public airports and train stations, why not our buses? Greyhound's already doin a huge number of daily buses with over 500k passengers, that's crazy! πŸš‚

And let's not forget about the environmental benefits - takin the bus is like, way better for the planet. We can't keep addin more cars to our roads and emissions to our air, it's just not sustainable. A publicly owned station would centralize all bus service into one hub, makin life easier for everyone.

It's especially crucial for low-income folks who rely on buses 'cause they can't afford other options. And let's not forget about women seekink reproductive health care and LGBTQ residents fleein persecution - our buses are the lifeline for them too! 🌈

$50 million seems like a steal compared to all the costs of other transit projects. The return on investment would be huge, and it'd put Chicago on par with other major cities. So yeah, let's get this bus station built ASAP! πŸ’ͺ
 
omg, this is like, soooo exciting! πŸš€ a publicly owned bus station is just what chicago needs right now. i mean, think about it, we already have public air travel and rail stations, so why not buses? it's all about dignity and respect for budget-conscious travelers, you know? πŸ€— plus, it'll be so much better for the environment, let's be real, taking the bus is way more eco-friendly than flying or driving. 🌎 as if the $50 million price tag isn't already a steal compared to the costs of other transportation projects. can't wait to see this happen and make chicago a leader in public transportation! πŸ’»
 
OMG this is such amazing news!!! πŸ’– A publicly owned bus station is like, so overdue for Chicago! 🀩 I mean, think about it, Greyhound already operates there and they're one of the biggest players, but what about all those smaller bus companies? It's time to give them a level playing field too 😊. And can you even imagine how much easier it'll be for people on tight budgets to get around πŸ€‘. I'm so down for this initiative! πŸ’ͺ
 
🚨 I think it's crazy we're even having this conversation! A publicly owned bus station is long overdue. It's not about being radical, it's about basic human rights πŸ€—. We already have airports and train stations, so why not buses? Greyhound is already a major player, but what about the smaller companies that can't afford to use the curbs? A centralized hub would be a game-changer for these travelers. And let's not forget about sustainability – taking the bus is way better for the environment 🌎. The cost of $50 million seems like a steal compared to all the money we're spending on other transportation projects. It's time for Chicago to step up its public transportation game and show the rest of the country what it's working towards πŸš€.
 
Back
Top