Funding the arts has become a contentious issue in politics. Critics argue that Conservatives are often overlooked when it comes to receiving credit for their cultural investments, with many attributing this lack of recognition to the fact that the funding was provided during their government.
The reality is more complex. During the COVID-19 pandemic, culture was the only sector to receive its own bespoke rescue package, amounting to Β£2 billion and supporting over 5,000 organisations across the country. The government also directed billions into culture-led projects as part of levelling up initiatives in towns and borderlands.
For example, ambitious cultural projects such as Aviva Studios in Manchester, Bristol Beacon, and the V&A East in London have received significant funding. Additionally, film tax reliefs have been extended to include theatre, museums, and orchestras, further demonstrating the government's commitment to the arts.
However, when it comes to public recognition, culture leaders often fail to acknowledge the efforts of politicians from all parties who have supported their sector. This is partly due to a narrative that doesn't align with their worldview, causing many recipients to remain silent.
It's essential for the culture sector to engage with politicians and officials more actively, rather than relying on their discretion. By doing so, they can build trust and demonstrate appreciation for the funding they receive. Ultimately, it's up to them to follow the money and welcome attention from all parties, not just those who share their values.
As Neil Mendoza, a former commissioner for culture at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, notes, the lack of recognition is a self-inflicted wound that can only be addressed by changing one's own approach. By being more vocal and proactive in engaging with politicians, the culture sector can reap greater rewards from government funding and build a stronger case for itself.
The reality is more complex. During the COVID-19 pandemic, culture was the only sector to receive its own bespoke rescue package, amounting to Β£2 billion and supporting over 5,000 organisations across the country. The government also directed billions into culture-led projects as part of levelling up initiatives in towns and borderlands.
For example, ambitious cultural projects such as Aviva Studios in Manchester, Bristol Beacon, and the V&A East in London have received significant funding. Additionally, film tax reliefs have been extended to include theatre, museums, and orchestras, further demonstrating the government's commitment to the arts.
However, when it comes to public recognition, culture leaders often fail to acknowledge the efforts of politicians from all parties who have supported their sector. This is partly due to a narrative that doesn't align with their worldview, causing many recipients to remain silent.
It's essential for the culture sector to engage with politicians and officials more actively, rather than relying on their discretion. By doing so, they can build trust and demonstrate appreciation for the funding they receive. Ultimately, it's up to them to follow the money and welcome attention from all parties, not just those who share their values.
As Neil Mendoza, a former commissioner for culture at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, notes, the lack of recognition is a self-inflicted wound that can only be addressed by changing one's own approach. By being more vocal and proactive in engaging with politicians, the culture sector can reap greater rewards from government funding and build a stronger case for itself.