USDA's plan to have food stamp recipients reapply has caused widespread confusion, with advocates and lawmakers questioning the motives behind the proposal. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins suggested that nearly 42 million people who receive federal food aid would need to reapply for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps.
Critics argue that this plan would be duplicative, create significant paperwork backlogs, and likely result in many eligible individuals losing benefits. Experts point out that fraud is not a widespread problem with SNAP, citing data that only 0.1% of households enrolled in the program are referred for administrative review or prosecution on suspicion of fraud.
Rollins' comments were made during an interview on Newsmax, where she claimed that the program is plagued by widespread fraud. However, experts dispute this claim, saying that intentional fraud by participants is rare. The USDA has stated that Rollins wants to reduce fraud in the SNAP program, but critics argue that her plan would be ineffective and cause more harm than good.
The proposal comes as the Trump administration seeks to cut food assistance for millions of Americans. In November, congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump signed a major tax cuts and spending law that is expected to shrink federal SNAP spending by $187 billion over 10 years. This has added work requirements for many SNAP recipients and shifted some costs to states.
Lawmakers have expressed outrage at Rollins' comments, with Ranking Member Angie Craig calling them "bullsh*t" and "propaganda." Experts argue that the proposal would harm vulnerable populations, including low-income families and children who rely on SNAP to access basic necessities like food.
The USDA has not provided clear details on how it plans to proceed with the proposal or under what authority it will implement Rollins' plan. Spokespeople have declined to respond to follow-up questions or criticisms from lawmakers and experts.
Critics argue that instead of reapplying for benefits, SNAP recipients should be working towards more targeted reforms that address the root causes of food insecurity and improve the overall effectiveness of the program.
Critics argue that this plan would be duplicative, create significant paperwork backlogs, and likely result in many eligible individuals losing benefits. Experts point out that fraud is not a widespread problem with SNAP, citing data that only 0.1% of households enrolled in the program are referred for administrative review or prosecution on suspicion of fraud.
Rollins' comments were made during an interview on Newsmax, where she claimed that the program is plagued by widespread fraud. However, experts dispute this claim, saying that intentional fraud by participants is rare. The USDA has stated that Rollins wants to reduce fraud in the SNAP program, but critics argue that her plan would be ineffective and cause more harm than good.
The proposal comes as the Trump administration seeks to cut food assistance for millions of Americans. In November, congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump signed a major tax cuts and spending law that is expected to shrink federal SNAP spending by $187 billion over 10 years. This has added work requirements for many SNAP recipients and shifted some costs to states.
Lawmakers have expressed outrage at Rollins' comments, with Ranking Member Angie Craig calling them "bullsh*t" and "propaganda." Experts argue that the proposal would harm vulnerable populations, including low-income families and children who rely on SNAP to access basic necessities like food.
The USDA has not provided clear details on how it plans to proceed with the proposal or under what authority it will implement Rollins' plan. Spokespeople have declined to respond to follow-up questions or criticisms from lawmakers and experts.
Critics argue that instead of reapplying for benefits, SNAP recipients should be working towards more targeted reforms that address the root causes of food insecurity and improve the overall effectiveness of the program.