The FBI is reportedly seeking to develop drones equipped with artificial intelligence, specifically facial recognition technology, in a bid to expand its surveillance capabilities. According to federal procurement documents, the agency is looking for vendors to provide AI and machine learning solutions that can be integrated into unmanned aerial systems (UAS). The move has sparked concerns among civil libertarians, who argue that such technology could exacerbate the chilling effect of surveillance on activities protected by the First Amendment.
Critics say that facial recognition technology is not designed to target specific individuals but rather to conduct indiscriminate mass surveillance. Matthew Guariglia, a policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned that this technology "is essentially tailor-made for political retribution and harassment." The use of such drones could lead to a chilling effect on free speech and assembly, as protesters might feel targeted by law enforcement.
The FBI's request for information also raises concerns about the potential misuse of AI-enabled drones in detecting weapons. While the technology may not be effective in all scenarios, its limitations could pose a risk to public safety. Guariglia noted that "no company has yet proven that AI firearm detection is a viable technology" and expressed skepticism about the accuracy of such systems.
The use of surveillance drones by law enforcement agencies has already raised concerns in recent years. In New York City, the NYPD has used drones to surveil protests without adequate oversight, while the U.S. Marshals Service deployed drones to monitor protesters in Washington, D.C. The deployment of AI-enabled drones could further erode trust between law enforcement and communities.
The use of such technology also highlights a broader issue: the erosion of democratic institutions and the rise of authoritarianism under President Donald Trump. Critics argue that Trump's administration has engaged in a full-scale assault on democracy, with court orders being ignored and media outlets facing investigation. The Intercept, which published this article, has been critical of Trump's policies and is one of few remaining voices defending press freedom.
As the use of surveillance drones by law enforcement agencies continues to grow, it is essential that there are checks in place to ensure that such technology is used responsibly and with transparency. The public must remain vigilant and demand accountability from those in power.
Critics say that facial recognition technology is not designed to target specific individuals but rather to conduct indiscriminate mass surveillance. Matthew Guariglia, a policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned that this technology "is essentially tailor-made for political retribution and harassment." The use of such drones could lead to a chilling effect on free speech and assembly, as protesters might feel targeted by law enforcement.
The FBI's request for information also raises concerns about the potential misuse of AI-enabled drones in detecting weapons. While the technology may not be effective in all scenarios, its limitations could pose a risk to public safety. Guariglia noted that "no company has yet proven that AI firearm detection is a viable technology" and expressed skepticism about the accuracy of such systems.
The use of surveillance drones by law enforcement agencies has already raised concerns in recent years. In New York City, the NYPD has used drones to surveil protests without adequate oversight, while the U.S. Marshals Service deployed drones to monitor protesters in Washington, D.C. The deployment of AI-enabled drones could further erode trust between law enforcement and communities.
The use of such technology also highlights a broader issue: the erosion of democratic institutions and the rise of authoritarianism under President Donald Trump. Critics argue that Trump's administration has engaged in a full-scale assault on democracy, with court orders being ignored and media outlets facing investigation. The Intercept, which published this article, has been critical of Trump's policies and is one of few remaining voices defending press freedom.
As the use of surveillance drones by law enforcement agencies continues to grow, it is essential that there are checks in place to ensure that such technology is used responsibly and with transparency. The public must remain vigilant and demand accountability from those in power.