INTERPOL's leadership is about to elect its next president, and it has never been more crucial that the choice be made with integrity intact. As delegates from 196 member countries gather for this pivotal election, a stark reality emerges: one of the frontrunners, Mustafa Serkan Sabanca, Turkey's police chief, has been implicated in manipulating INTERPOL's rules to further his country's interests.
A leaked memo showing Sabanca advising Turkish officials on how to disguise a politically motivated case as an embezzlement matter raises serious questions about his fitness for the top job. The document outlines a straightforward plan to deceive INTERPOL's systems and avoid detection, effectively subverting the organization's own rules. This is not a minor infraction but a clear indication of Sabanca's willingness to erode the neutrality that underpins INTERPOL's authority.
Turkey's record on abuse of its Red Notice system, used for international arrest requests aimed at targeting political opponents abroad, makes this development particularly concerning. The country has submitted over 3,500 such requests since the 2016 coup attempt, using these tools as a means to pursue perceived enemies rather than genuine suspects. This is an abuse of power that must not be condoned.
Sancara's candidacy poses a threat to the global policing system and its most valuable asset - trust. INTERPOL relies on the assumption that Red Notices represent genuine criminal activity, that leaders uphold the organization's constitution, and that political neutrality holds meaning. If Sabanca is elected as president, these assumptions will be undermined.
The implications extend beyond Turkey's borders, affecting not only dissidents, refugees, and exiles but also democratic states. The erosion of trust in INTERPOL could lead to hesitation from judges, border officers, and even states withdrawing cooperation. In reality, it would benefit authoritarian governments seeking to manipulate the system for their own purposes.
In this critical moment, member states must come together to prevent a profound error that would send a troubling message to those who exploit the system for their advantage. The election of Sabanca would be an unambiguous endorsement of manipulation over integrity and would undermine INTERPOL's legitimacy forever.
This is not just about governance; it is about upholding the principles of trust, impartiality, and accountability. In the face of such a choice, member states must prioritize these values above all else. The credibility of INTERPOL and the safety of those relying on its services demand nothing less than the selection of leaders who embody integrity and neutrality.
Ultimately, the stakes are clear: electing Sabanca would spell disaster for an organization that prides itself on acting as a guardian of global policing. But electing someone who shares the values of trust, impartiality, and accountability will ensure that INTERPOL remains relevant and effective in safeguarding our world from those who exploit its systems for personal gain.
A leaked memo showing Sabanca advising Turkish officials on how to disguise a politically motivated case as an embezzlement matter raises serious questions about his fitness for the top job. The document outlines a straightforward plan to deceive INTERPOL's systems and avoid detection, effectively subverting the organization's own rules. This is not a minor infraction but a clear indication of Sabanca's willingness to erode the neutrality that underpins INTERPOL's authority.
Turkey's record on abuse of its Red Notice system, used for international arrest requests aimed at targeting political opponents abroad, makes this development particularly concerning. The country has submitted over 3,500 such requests since the 2016 coup attempt, using these tools as a means to pursue perceived enemies rather than genuine suspects. This is an abuse of power that must not be condoned.
Sancara's candidacy poses a threat to the global policing system and its most valuable asset - trust. INTERPOL relies on the assumption that Red Notices represent genuine criminal activity, that leaders uphold the organization's constitution, and that political neutrality holds meaning. If Sabanca is elected as president, these assumptions will be undermined.
The implications extend beyond Turkey's borders, affecting not only dissidents, refugees, and exiles but also democratic states. The erosion of trust in INTERPOL could lead to hesitation from judges, border officers, and even states withdrawing cooperation. In reality, it would benefit authoritarian governments seeking to manipulate the system for their own purposes.
In this critical moment, member states must come together to prevent a profound error that would send a troubling message to those who exploit the system for their advantage. The election of Sabanca would be an unambiguous endorsement of manipulation over integrity and would undermine INTERPOL's legitimacy forever.
This is not just about governance; it is about upholding the principles of trust, impartiality, and accountability. In the face of such a choice, member states must prioritize these values above all else. The credibility of INTERPOL and the safety of those relying on its services demand nothing less than the selection of leaders who embody integrity and neutrality.
Ultimately, the stakes are clear: electing Sabanca would spell disaster for an organization that prides itself on acting as a guardian of global policing. But electing someone who shares the values of trust, impartiality, and accountability will ensure that INTERPOL remains relevant and effective in safeguarding our world from those who exploit its systems for personal gain.