BBC Director General Tim Davie has tendered his resignation along with that of Director of News Deborah Turness, a fallout stemming from Panorama's handling of Donald Trump's 2021 speech. However, beneath this high-profile crisis lies Robbie Gibb, an influential figure whose opaque grasp on the BBC's inner workings was allowed to persist for over a decade.
Gibb had spent nearly two decades influencing British public life through his control of key positions at both No 10 and the BBC. This power allowed him to significantly shape the corporation's political coverage, particularly on Brexit, Trump, and ultimately, Gaza. The latter proved particularly contentious, with Gibb allegedly orchestrating pressure that resulted in the BBC's decision to withdraw an investigation into Israel's destruction of Gaza's healthcare system.
This situation highlights how a single individual's unchecked power can irreparably damage an institution like the BBC. Gibb had initially been appointed as head of press at No 10 and later took up influential roles within the BBC, using these positions to advance his own agenda without any notable accountability.
Critics view this state of affairs as an insidious form of interference, in which Gibb has managed to subtly steer the corporation's coverage towards aligning with his own ideological leanings. This approach has come at the cost of undermining trust within both No 10 and the BBC.
A key episode that exposed Gibb's methods was during the Windrush scandal in 2018, when he reacted furiously after Channel 4 News questioned him over its coverage of the issue. He barred them from interviews with the prime minister and extended his ban to cover all other mainstream media outlets.
This reaction exemplifies how Gibb consistently sought to manipulate the narrative that only his own brand of impartiality could ensure. This stance ultimately resulted in a profound crisis for the BBC, coupled with a significant battle with Trump over a Panorama edit of one of his speeches.
As the editor of Channel 4 News from 2012 to 2022, I witnessed firsthand how Gibb operated by exerting influence behind the scenes and restricting access to key figures. His conduct at No 10 during the Brexit campaign, where he allegedly intervened on behalf of Arron Banks and Nigel Farage, exemplifies the kind of partisan meddling that would later come under scrutiny.
A similar dynamic can be observed in the appointment of Gibb to the BBC board, a position from which he was not supposed to interfere with day-to-day editorial decisions. However, allegations emerged of him continuing to exert significant influence over key appointments and matters.
Gibb's impact on British politics has been profound, particularly in his support for Brexit and right-wing causes. His involvement extends beyond the realm of journalism, touching upon his influential role as a figure within Israelโs Jewish community through his interests in the Jewish Chronicle.
Ultimately, it seems that Gibbโs power and influence at the BBC led to Davie and Turness's resignations, albeit not because they were cowed by him. Instead, their decision to act too slowly was the deciding factor.
Throughout this ordeal, Gibb remains an elusive figure whose shadow has dominated British public life for years. His ability to navigate the inner workings of two significant institutions without transparency or accountability has left a legacy of mistrust and crisis that will likely be difficult for the BBC to overcome.
Gibb had spent nearly two decades influencing British public life through his control of key positions at both No 10 and the BBC. This power allowed him to significantly shape the corporation's political coverage, particularly on Brexit, Trump, and ultimately, Gaza. The latter proved particularly contentious, with Gibb allegedly orchestrating pressure that resulted in the BBC's decision to withdraw an investigation into Israel's destruction of Gaza's healthcare system.
This situation highlights how a single individual's unchecked power can irreparably damage an institution like the BBC. Gibb had initially been appointed as head of press at No 10 and later took up influential roles within the BBC, using these positions to advance his own agenda without any notable accountability.
Critics view this state of affairs as an insidious form of interference, in which Gibb has managed to subtly steer the corporation's coverage towards aligning with his own ideological leanings. This approach has come at the cost of undermining trust within both No 10 and the BBC.
A key episode that exposed Gibb's methods was during the Windrush scandal in 2018, when he reacted furiously after Channel 4 News questioned him over its coverage of the issue. He barred them from interviews with the prime minister and extended his ban to cover all other mainstream media outlets.
This reaction exemplifies how Gibb consistently sought to manipulate the narrative that only his own brand of impartiality could ensure. This stance ultimately resulted in a profound crisis for the BBC, coupled with a significant battle with Trump over a Panorama edit of one of his speeches.
As the editor of Channel 4 News from 2012 to 2022, I witnessed firsthand how Gibb operated by exerting influence behind the scenes and restricting access to key figures. His conduct at No 10 during the Brexit campaign, where he allegedly intervened on behalf of Arron Banks and Nigel Farage, exemplifies the kind of partisan meddling that would later come under scrutiny.
A similar dynamic can be observed in the appointment of Gibb to the BBC board, a position from which he was not supposed to interfere with day-to-day editorial decisions. However, allegations emerged of him continuing to exert significant influence over key appointments and matters.
Gibb's impact on British politics has been profound, particularly in his support for Brexit and right-wing causes. His involvement extends beyond the realm of journalism, touching upon his influential role as a figure within Israelโs Jewish community through his interests in the Jewish Chronicle.
Ultimately, it seems that Gibbโs power and influence at the BBC led to Davie and Turness's resignations, albeit not because they were cowed by him. Instead, their decision to act too slowly was the deciding factor.
Throughout this ordeal, Gibb remains an elusive figure whose shadow has dominated British public life for years. His ability to navigate the inner workings of two significant institutions without transparency or accountability has left a legacy of mistrust and crisis that will likely be difficult for the BBC to overcome.