The Ashes 2025-26: Zak Crawley is short of form - so why do they keep picking him?

Zak Crawley's Struggles in the Ashes: A Puzzle That England Can't Solve

The debate surrounding Zak Crawley's place in England's Test XI has been a recurring theme throughout the 2021-22 Ashes series. The question on everyone's mind is, why does England continue to pick a batter who averages just 30.96 from his 60 Tests?

At first glance, it seems like a bizarre decision, especially after Crawley's dismal form in the first Test against Australia. However, those close to the team believe that Crawley has been unfairly targeted by critics. They point out that no English opener has scored as many runs or had as many successful partnerships with Ben Duckett since his comeback.

Crawley also boasts an impressive record against high-pitched fast bowlers and the Australian team's primary pacers. His ability to thrive under pressure and perform well on difficult surfaces is undeniable. With a career average of 48.25 against deliveries over 87mph, he has been one of England's most effective opening batters in recent years.

However, Crawley's struggles in Perth have raised serious doubts about his suitability for the Ashes series. After scoring just two ducks in the first Test, many are questioning whether he still belongs at the top of the order. His inability to cope with the Australian bowlers and his tendency to get out to drives on bouncy surfaces have raised concerns.

The problem lies not in Crawley's ability to bat but rather his mental approach. He seems to struggle under pressure, often becoming too aggressive early on in his innings. This can be detrimental when facing high-speed deliveries that are difficult to control.

England has long believed that Crawley is suited to batting against the Australian team, particularly on bouncy surfaces where he excels. The theory behind this decision was built on his previous performances in Australia and some limited success against high-paced deliveries. However, reality has proven harsher, with Crawley struggling to cope with even those conditions.

The biggest challenge now for England is how to get the best out of Crawley without sacrificing their batting average. They will need to develop a more nuanced approach, taking into account Crawley's strengths and weaknesses, in order to avoid repeating past failures.

I think Zak Crawley has had it rough lately . People are super harsh on him after that first Test against Australia, but some folks close to the team feel he's been getting a bad rap . He does have some awesome stats against high-pitched fast bowlers and Aussie pacers - that's for real!

But, yeah, his form in Perth was pretty sketchy . Scoring just two ducks in the first Test isn't great, and I can see why people are wondering if he still belongs at the top of England's order .

For me, it's not that Crawley's a bad batsman, it's just that his mental game is a bit wonky under pressure . He gets too aggressive early on in his innings and starts to get out to those tricky drives on bouncy surfaces .

I think England needs to have a more nuanced approach with Crawley - he's got strengths and weaknesses, and they need to play to that . They can't just stick with the same old theory because it didn't work last time . They need to adapt and find a way to get the best out of him without sacrificing their batting average .

I mean, come on, 30.96 average? That's not bad at all, considering the opposition he's up against . And let's be real, he's been doing okay with Duckett, those two have had some solid partnerships. But Perth is a whole different story, and it's hard to ignore those ducks . Still, I think people are being too harsh on him. The guy can bat well, but maybe needs to tone down that early aggression? It's all about finding the right balance, you know? And yeah, his record against high-pitched fast bowlers is pretty impressive . England just needs to figure out how to get the best out of him without sacrificing the team average

I mean, I was watching the Ashes with my mates back in 2013, and we were all like "Crawley's our man!" He was so young then and had this raw talent that just oozed potential. And you know what? He did alright for himself! But now, he's struggling like crazy, and it's hard to see why England keep picking him.

I think they're being too soft on him, if I'm honest. They need to give him a bit of a boot up the backside to get him back on track. He's got this amazing record against Aussie bowlers, but Perth is a whole different story, innit? The Aussie bowlers are so quick and tricky, and Crawley just can't seem to cope with it.

I reckon the problem is that they're trying to make him fit into this mold of what's expected of English batters. But he's not like them, you know? He's a bit of an oddball, and that's what makes him interesting! What England need to do is get back to basics and see if they can find a way to bring out the best in Crawley, rather than trying to fix everything.

It's like my old man used to say: "You can't rush perfection, lad." They need to take their time, analyze what's not working, and then develop a plan to get Crawley firing on all cylinders again. Easy peasy!

I'm not buying this whole 'Crawley's mental approach' thing . He's been playing for years, what's new? I think the real issue here is that England's team selection is just too inconsistent. They're always trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, and it's not working out. Crawley might not be getting the best of Australia right now, but he's still one of their most solid opening batsmen. The problem is that the team around him (and I'm looking at you, Ben Duckett ) isn't doing enough to support him. They need to find a more stable middle order and let Crawley settle in, rather than making these big changes every few series. It's just too much drama for me

I think Crawley gets a bad rep lol . People forget he's got a 48.25 avg against fast bowlers , which is pretty impressive! And those successful partnerships with Ben Duckett are real . It's not just about his form in Perth; it's about how he handles pressure and bouncy surfaces. He can't be expected to play the same way on all surfaces, right? Maybe they need to tweak their strategy a bit instead of questioning Crawley's place in the team .

I think 30.96 is still pretty decent for an opener , especially if you consider he's had some great partnerships with Duckett. Plus, his record against Aussie pacers is insane . He's definitely got a point about being unfairly targeted by critics - it's easy to forget that everyone has bad days, even the best players!

But yeah, Perth can be tough , and I get why he struggled there. Maybe England needs to rethink their approach, like taking away his drive on bouncy surfaces and making him play more defensively? It's all about finding that balance between being aggressive and playing smart .

The thing is, Crawley's still averaged 48.25 against deliveries over 87mph, which is basically a strike rate of 50+ ! He's definitely got the skills to make it work if England can just get him in a better mindset .

.. I don't know about this Zak Crawley guy ... I mean, 30.96 is alright, I guess, but not enough to warrant being the main man at the top of the order, if you ask me . And yeah, he's had some good stats against Aussie bowlers and all that, but Perth is a whole different ball game ... it's like trying to make a soufflé rise when your ingredients are all wrong, ya know?

The thing is, Crawley's always been someone who gets under the skin of fans, you feel me? Like, one bad Test and suddenly he's done . But at the same time, I think England should stick by him 'cause... well, they've invested in him and all that .

But what really grinds my gears is when people say he's struggling under pressure . Like, mate, we've seen some of the greats fail under pressure too, you know? Sir Ian Botham himself had those dreadful periods against India ... it's just cricket, innit? The problem lies in England not having a solid backup plan for when Crawley's on a dodgy day .

It's all about finding that balance and playing to his strengths without making the team look like they're settling for mediocrity . Fingers crossed they figure it out soon, or we might be stuck watching some poor bloke get slaughtered by Aussie bowlers again ...

I think England is being too harsh on Zak Crawley, he's been unfairly maligned . His stats are actually pretty impressive considering the team's struggles as a whole . The fact that no other English opener has matched his run tally or partnership success with Ben Duckett since his return is telling . And let's not forget his record against high-pitched fast bowlers – he's one of England's most effective opening batters in recent years .

The problem lies in his mental approach, becoming too aggressive under pressure . But maybe instead of trying to change him completely, England should try to work with that aspect of his game? It seems like they're stuck between a rock and a hard place – if he's not aggressive enough, he gets out easily, but if he is, he struggles on bouncy surfaces .

The Ashes series could be the perfect opportunity for Crawley to redeem himself . With some careful planning and mental preparation, he might just find his mojo again . It's time for England to rethink their approach with him in the team – they need a more nuanced plan if they want to get the best out of him .

I think england should just drop crawley already lol they cant keep ben duckett and crawley at the same time itd be so unbalanced... i mean dont get me wrong crawley has a good record against high speed bowlers but thats not enough to make him the number one opener

and what about his mental game? he gets out to drives on bouncy surfaces like it happens every. single. time it cant be that hard to adjust to aussie bowlers... and yeah england knows they need to change their approach but its easier said than done

I'm curious to know why they still keep picking him ... I mean, yeah, he has a good record against Aussie bowlers and all that, but Perth is a whole different story ... his mental game seems to be the problem, doesn't it? He gets too aggressive when under pressure, and that's exactly what they need him to avoid in tough conditions. And what about Duckett? Shouldn't he be given more time at the top of the order instead?

I don't usually comment but I think it's time someone said that Zak Crawley's struggles aren't just about him . The pressure on him is immense, especially with the expectations of the team and fans being so high. If England had a deeper bench of opening batsmen, maybe they could have given Crawley a breather without putting so much on his shoulders .

I'm not saying he's the right man for the job but I don't think it's fair to write him off just yet . He's got some amazing stats and can be really effective when in form . But yeah, maybe England need to have a bigger conversation about how to get the best out of him without sacrificing the team's batting average .

It's not like Crawley is a bad player or anything . He just needs to find that balance between being aggressive and playing smart . And I think that's something he can learn from watching other players who have dealt with similar pressures . Anyways, gotta agree with the experts that it's time for England to take a closer look at their batting lineup

Crawley's form has been all over the place lately . I feel for him, he's clearly got skills that England needs. But, at the same time, 30.96 is just not where you want your opening batsman to be averaging . The thing is, I think Crawley does struggle under pressure, and it's not just about batting against high-pitched fast bowlers . He gets too aggressive early on and starts losing wickets when he should be building partnerships with Ben Duckett .

England needs to find a way to get the best out of him without sacrificing their average . Maybe they need to work on his mental approach, make him more selective with his shots, and let him play his game at times when the situation calls for it . It's not about giving up on Crawley, but finding a way to make him fit into the team's overall strategy .

I dont get why england is still pickin crawley he averages 30 something its pretty bad . Like i get that hes had some good games but you cant keep relyin on him as an opener when hes strugglin like this. his form in perth was super poor and yeah maybe hes got a thing against fast bowlers but thats not enough to save him atm . he needs to work on his mental game or somethin cuz hes gettin out for no reason on bouncy surfaces its like hes tryna be a hero or sumthin . england needs to rethink their strategy and find someone who can actually deliver the goods consistently

i think england needs to rethink its strategy with crawley . he has skills that are valuable but he just can't seem to get his head around the pressure situation, you feel? it's like he gets too aggressive early on and then starts to struggle . they need to find a way to make him more confident under fire without sacrificing their batting average . maybe try a different approach with ben duckett or another opener and see what works better

Ugh this is getting old. England can't make up its mind about Crawley! He has the skills, but mental pressure gets him every time . Can't they see he thrives on bouncy surfaces? It's like they're trying to hold onto a fading dream of past glories . The team is just too defensive, always playing it safe and never taking risks . Crawley needs to take charge of his game, not be held back by fear . Give him some breathing space, let him face his demons ... or at least let him try new approaches !

I mean, you can't really knock the lad down . He's been through some tough times but still manages to put up solid numbers at 48.25 against those high-speed deliveries. I think it's unfair to say he's not suited for batting in the Ashes - his record against Aussie pacers is actually pretty impressive . The problem might be that England are trying too hard to fit him into a specific role, rather than letting him find his own groove at the top of the order . Maybe it's time to give Ben Duckett more freedom alongside him and see what happens?

I feel bad for Zak Crawley , he's been getting a lot of flak lately. I think England has been too harsh on him, ya know? He's had some tough games against the Aussie bowlers, but I still believe in his ability to bat. He's got skills and stats that back it up - 48.25 average against deliveries over 87mph is no joke! The problem seems to be more mental than physical, and if England can work with him on building his confidence under pressure, he could really shine. Maybe they should try a different approach, like having Ben Duckett open with him sometimes? That way they can still make use of their successful partnerships without putting too much pressure on Crawley. Let's give the guy another chance, shall we?

I think they're being way too harsh on Zak Crawley . He's been doing alright for himself, especially against the Aussie bowlers who are notoriously tough to handle. The problem is, England doesn't really have a lot of options in his position and he's still trying to find his groove back from an injury . They need to give him some more time and work with him on those mental approach issues, 'cause at the end of the day, he's been one of their best batsmen for years . Maybe they just need to tweak their strategy a bit, like having Ben Duckett support him more, that's worked well in the past . Don't wanna see them drop him just yet

I gotta say, I'm feeling kinda torn about Zak Crawley . On one hand, he's got some serious skills, especially against high-pitched fast bowlers . His record speaks for itself - 48.25 avg is no joke! But on the other hand, his mental game seems to be a major issue . He gets too aggressive early on and it can be super detrimental when facing high-speed deliveries . I think England needs to work on finding a balance with Crawley's strengths & weaknesses . Maybe they need to bring in some new strategies or tactics to help him succeed, rather than just relying on his past performances . We'll see how they go for the rest of the series!