Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget Misses Mark on Growth Promises
The UK business world was largely underwhelmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves' recent budget, which failed to deliver the promised pro-growth measures. The Treasury's efforts to engage with the banking sector were met with a lukewarm response, with big international banks like JP Morgan announcing new office openings in Canary Wharf rather than any significant investment plans.
In fact, many businesses are expressing deep-seated distrust of the government's ability to implement meaningful policy changes. The long weeks of briefing and speculation leading up to the budget only served to exacerbate this feeling, with income tax hikes being repeatedly introduced and then withdrawn.
While Reeves may have achieved some short-term goals, such as calming the bond market, her overall vision for growth remains elusive. The lack of meaningful tax reform is a major concern, with many experts arguing that more needs to be done to stimulate investment, hiring, and international competitiveness.
The government's planning reforms and increased infrastructure spending were touted as long-term investments, but their impact will likely take years to materialize. In contrast, the relatively minor introduction of per-mile charging for electric vehicles from 2028 is seen as a meager concession to growing environmental concerns.
Perhaps most concerning, however, is the government's failure to address the UK's dysfunctional property taxes, including stamp duty on housing transactions and the regressive nature of council tax. These issues have been repeatedly touted as areas requiring reform, but any progress appears to be slow in coming.
The target of building 1.5 million new homes over the course of parliament is also at risk of being missed, with little sense of how this goal will be improved upon. Meanwhile, the "British industrial competitiveness scheme" remains stalled, and stamp duty on shares continues to deter investors from London.
As one expert notes, the government's pro-growth ambitions remain at odds with its fiscal reality. While Reeves may have avoided some short-term challenges, her overall strategy is lacking in ambition and urgency. Businesses are growing increasingly frustrated with the lack of meaningful reform, and it remains to be seen whether this budget will serve as a turning point for the UK's economic prospects.
The UK business world was largely underwhelmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves' recent budget, which failed to deliver the promised pro-growth measures. The Treasury's efforts to engage with the banking sector were met with a lukewarm response, with big international banks like JP Morgan announcing new office openings in Canary Wharf rather than any significant investment plans.
In fact, many businesses are expressing deep-seated distrust of the government's ability to implement meaningful policy changes. The long weeks of briefing and speculation leading up to the budget only served to exacerbate this feeling, with income tax hikes being repeatedly introduced and then withdrawn.
While Reeves may have achieved some short-term goals, such as calming the bond market, her overall vision for growth remains elusive. The lack of meaningful tax reform is a major concern, with many experts arguing that more needs to be done to stimulate investment, hiring, and international competitiveness.
The government's planning reforms and increased infrastructure spending were touted as long-term investments, but their impact will likely take years to materialize. In contrast, the relatively minor introduction of per-mile charging for electric vehicles from 2028 is seen as a meager concession to growing environmental concerns.
Perhaps most concerning, however, is the government's failure to address the UK's dysfunctional property taxes, including stamp duty on housing transactions and the regressive nature of council tax. These issues have been repeatedly touted as areas requiring reform, but any progress appears to be slow in coming.
The target of building 1.5 million new homes over the course of parliament is also at risk of being missed, with little sense of how this goal will be improved upon. Meanwhile, the "British industrial competitiveness scheme" remains stalled, and stamp duty on shares continues to deter investors from London.
As one expert notes, the government's pro-growth ambitions remain at odds with its fiscal reality. While Reeves may have avoided some short-term challenges, her overall strategy is lacking in ambition and urgency. Businesses are growing increasingly frustrated with the lack of meaningful reform, and it remains to be seen whether this budget will serve as a turning point for the UK's economic prospects.