UK Government Imposes Strict Taxi Ban on Asylum Seekers Over £15m Annual Bill
The Home Office has announced that asylum seekers will face strict new rules when it comes to taking taxis for medical appointments, with a ban on private journeys starting from February. The move is expected to save the government millions of pounds, but campaigners have expressed concerns over the impact on vulnerable individuals.
Currently, asylum seekers are entitled to one return bus journey per week, but the Home Office spends around £15.8 million annually on taxis for medical appointments alone. In an effort to crack down on waste and profiteering by private contractors, the government has introduced new rules that will limit taxi use to exceptional cases only.
From February, asylum seekers will be forced to rely on public transport, including buses, unless they meet specific criteria deemed "exceptional" by the Home Office. These criteria include individuals with physical disabilities, serious or chronic illnesses, or pregnancy-related needs.
Critics argue that the new rules could leave vulnerable individuals stranded and unable to access medical care, particularly in cases where transportation is essential for treatment such as chemotherapy. Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, has warned that there is a risk the threshold for exceptional cases will be set too high, leaving those who need assistance without it.
"This policy change is symptomatic of an asylum system that allows private contractors to make vast profits at the expense of taxpayers," Solomon said. "The use of taxis is more a consequence of government incompetence and poor contract management than people in the asylum system exploiting it."
The move follows a broader crackdown on waste in asylum accommodation and transport contracts, which have already saved over £74 million in costs. The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has vowed to root out waste and provide alternative accommodations for asylum seekers, including military sites.
However, campaigners remain concerned about the impact of the ban on vulnerable individuals, particularly those with severe disabilities or serious illnesses. Asylum seekers are often moved to different areas while undergoing treatment, leading to long journeys by taxi that can be costly and time-consuming.
The decision has also sparked controversy over the government's refusal to provide free public transport for asylum seekers, despite repeated calls from campaigners over the years. A pilot scheme for free bus travel was launched in Oxford last year, with Scotland planning to introduce similar measures in 2026.
For now, asylum seekers will be forced to rely on buses and public transport for medical appointments, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for vulnerable individuals and families.
The Home Office has announced that asylum seekers will face strict new rules when it comes to taking taxis for medical appointments, with a ban on private journeys starting from February. The move is expected to save the government millions of pounds, but campaigners have expressed concerns over the impact on vulnerable individuals.
Currently, asylum seekers are entitled to one return bus journey per week, but the Home Office spends around £15.8 million annually on taxis for medical appointments alone. In an effort to crack down on waste and profiteering by private contractors, the government has introduced new rules that will limit taxi use to exceptional cases only.
From February, asylum seekers will be forced to rely on public transport, including buses, unless they meet specific criteria deemed "exceptional" by the Home Office. These criteria include individuals with physical disabilities, serious or chronic illnesses, or pregnancy-related needs.
Critics argue that the new rules could leave vulnerable individuals stranded and unable to access medical care, particularly in cases where transportation is essential for treatment such as chemotherapy. Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, has warned that there is a risk the threshold for exceptional cases will be set too high, leaving those who need assistance without it.
"This policy change is symptomatic of an asylum system that allows private contractors to make vast profits at the expense of taxpayers," Solomon said. "The use of taxis is more a consequence of government incompetence and poor contract management than people in the asylum system exploiting it."
The move follows a broader crackdown on waste in asylum accommodation and transport contracts, which have already saved over £74 million in costs. The Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has vowed to root out waste and provide alternative accommodations for asylum seekers, including military sites.
However, campaigners remain concerned about the impact of the ban on vulnerable individuals, particularly those with severe disabilities or serious illnesses. Asylum seekers are often moved to different areas while undergoing treatment, leading to long journeys by taxi that can be costly and time-consuming.
The decision has also sparked controversy over the government's refusal to provide free public transport for asylum seekers, despite repeated calls from campaigners over the years. A pilot scheme for free bus travel was launched in Oxford last year, with Scotland planning to introduce similar measures in 2026.
For now, asylum seekers will be forced to rely on buses and public transport for medical appointments, a move that could have far-reaching consequences for vulnerable individuals and families.