Sudan's Civil War Takes a Toxic Turn: Chlorine Gas Used as Weapon
In a disturbing turn of events, an investigation by the France 24 Observers team has uncovered evidence that chlorine gas was used as a weapon in Sudan's ongoing civil war. The use of this toxic substance was reported to be carried out by the Sudanese army as they attempted to recapture a strategic refinery from the Rapid Support Forces militia.
According to open-source investigations, two incidents were documented where barrels containing chlorine gas were dropped from the air near the refinery north of Khartoum. Experts have confirmed that these images are consistent with aerial drops of chlorine barrels, verifying the use of chemical weapons in the conflict.
However, what raises questions is how this military-grade substance ended up being used in such a context. The investigation reveals that the Sudanese army had acquired the chlorine gas through imports from India via Chemtrade International Corporation. However, it appears that the intended purpose of the importation was for water treatment purposes, with the chlorine gas supposedly intended to be used at water-treatment centres.
Further analysis has shown that the company responsible for importing the chlorine gas, Ports Engineering Company, has ties to military equipment and an Emirati company that supplies uniforms and shoes to the Sudanese intelligence service. This raises serious concerns about the true intentions behind the importation of the chlorine gas.
The use of chlorine gas as a weapon in this conflict is particularly worrying given its indiscriminate effects on civilians, including women and children. The lack of transparency from both the Sudanese army and Chemtrade International Corporation regarding the intended use of the chlorine gas has left many questions unanswered.
As tensions escalate in Sudan's civil war, it is essential to shed light on the human cost of such conflicts and hold those responsible accountable for their actions. The use of chemical weapons like chlorine gas only exacerbates the humanitarian crisis, making it even more challenging for civilians to access basic necessities like safe drinking water.
In a disturbing turn of events, an investigation by the France 24 Observers team has uncovered evidence that chlorine gas was used as a weapon in Sudan's ongoing civil war. The use of this toxic substance was reported to be carried out by the Sudanese army as they attempted to recapture a strategic refinery from the Rapid Support Forces militia.
According to open-source investigations, two incidents were documented where barrels containing chlorine gas were dropped from the air near the refinery north of Khartoum. Experts have confirmed that these images are consistent with aerial drops of chlorine barrels, verifying the use of chemical weapons in the conflict.
However, what raises questions is how this military-grade substance ended up being used in such a context. The investigation reveals that the Sudanese army had acquired the chlorine gas through imports from India via Chemtrade International Corporation. However, it appears that the intended purpose of the importation was for water treatment purposes, with the chlorine gas supposedly intended to be used at water-treatment centres.
Further analysis has shown that the company responsible for importing the chlorine gas, Ports Engineering Company, has ties to military equipment and an Emirati company that supplies uniforms and shoes to the Sudanese intelligence service. This raises serious concerns about the true intentions behind the importation of the chlorine gas.
The use of chlorine gas as a weapon in this conflict is particularly worrying given its indiscriminate effects on civilians, including women and children. The lack of transparency from both the Sudanese army and Chemtrade International Corporation regarding the intended use of the chlorine gas has left many questions unanswered.
As tensions escalate in Sudan's civil war, it is essential to shed light on the human cost of such conflicts and hold those responsible accountable for their actions. The use of chemical weapons like chlorine gas only exacerbates the humanitarian crisis, making it even more challenging for civilians to access basic necessities like safe drinking water.