Second strike on alleged drug boat was "war crime," says former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta

US Attack on Alleged Drug Boat Unlikely Justified as 'War Crime', Says Former Defense Secretary

A US military strike on an alleged drug boat in September, which was initially reported as a single-target operation, appears to have involved multiple airstrikes - raising serious questions about the proportionality and necessity of the attack. This revelation comes after a bombshell report by The Washington Post, suggesting that the initial assault was not enough to eliminate all targets, prompting the US military to launch additional strikes specifically targeting any survivors.

According to former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who discussed this incident with "CBS Evening News" co-anchor John Dickerson, such an attack could be considered a 'war crime'. The term is often used in international humanitarian law to describe attacks that cause unnecessary harm or loss of life. In Panetta's view, the repeated strikes on the vessel may have put innocent lives at risk.

Critics argue that the use of multiple airstrikes on a single target, even with the intention of neutralizing a potential threat, raises significant concerns about accountability and respect for international law. The incident highlights the need for greater transparency in military operations and the importance of examining each strike through the lens of proportionality and necessity.

As news outlets continue to scrutinize this incident, it is imperative that policymakers and military leaders provide clear explanations for their actions and engage in open discussions about the morality of targeting alleged drug boats.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this US attack on the alleged drug boat... πŸ€” It's crazy how a single target op can turn into multiple airstrikes, right? πŸ’₯ I mean, if the initial assault wasn't enough to take out all targets, what's the point of going in again and again? That just seems like a recipe for disaster. And now Leon Panetta is saying it could be considered a war crime? 🚫 Yeah, I can see why he'd think that way. The idea of innocent lives being put at risk because of some overzealous military operation is just not right. What's the point of "winning" if you're just going to lose people along the way? πŸ’”
 
I just got back from a really long flight from LA to Tokyo πŸ›«οΈπŸ‘€ and I'm still trying to process what happened with that US attack on the alleged drug boat πŸ€”. If it was meant to be a one-shot deal, why did they keep striking until everyone was gone? That doesn't seem right 😐. And what's up with all these airstrikes? You'd think they'd want to minimize collateral damage, you know? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I'm just not sure I agree that this wasn't some kind of war crime... isn't that a pretty serious accusation? πŸ€” What do you guys think? Should we be getting more info on what really went down? πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure what's more suspicious here - the fact that they had multiple airstrikes on a single target or the fact that they're trying to spin it as a 'single-target operation' now πŸ™„. If this was really just about taking out a bad guy, why did they need to keep firing? It's like they were trying to make sure everyone on board got hurt, even if they weren't directly involved in whatever nefarious activities the boat was allegedly doing 😐. I'm not buying the 'we were just trying to neutralize a threat' narrative - there's gotta be more to this story than what we're being told πŸ’‘.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one... I mean, I get that they're trying to take down these drug boat thingies, but come on! It's like we're living in a real-life video game where the rules are just made up as we go along 😱. First, it's a single-target op, then suddenly there are multiple airstrikes? That's not how you do counter-narcotics ops, fam πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

And what really gets my goat is that innocent people could've gotten hurt in the crossfire πŸ’”. Like, we're supposed to trust our military leaders to make these tough decisions, but it seems like they might be more interested in showing off their firepower than actually taking down the bad guys πŸ”«.

As a parent, I want to know what's going on behind closed doors, you know? What's the real story here? Why are we seeing all this secrecy and lack of transparency? It's not just about the US military; it's about accountability, period πŸ’―. We need to have some serious discussions about how we're handling these kinds of situations.
 
πŸ˜•πŸš« The US military's actions on that drug boat were so reckless 🀯! How could they just keep hitting the same target over and over again? πŸ’₯ It's like they didn't even care if they hurt innocent people πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, what's the point of taking out a whole ship just to kill the bad guys? πŸ€” We should be focusing on rehabilitation and helping people overcome their addictions, not just blowing them up πŸ’£. It's all about accountability now πŸ’Ό! The government needs to step up and explain themselves πŸ”. This whole situation is super suspicious πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ and it makes me wanna demand more transparency from our military leaders πŸ‘Š. Can't we just talk things out instead of resorting to violence? πŸ’¬πŸŒŽ
 
Back
Top