The White House has employed Sabrina Carpenter's hit song "Juno" in a disturbing TikTok video aimed at deterring undocumented immigrants from the US, with the administration using the Grammy-winning artist's catchy tune to soundtrack a montage of ICE agents detaining and arresting people. The viral clip appears to be an eerie echo of Carpenter's own concert experience, where she would "arrest" someone from the crowd during her performance, often featuring a fan or celebrity as the unsuspecting victim.
However, it is a far cry from the lighthearted fun that Carpenter intended when she first shared the song with her fans. Instead, the White House seems to have co-opted "Juno" for its own propaganda purposes, effectively using Carpenter's carefree vibe to normalize the brutal enforcement of immigration policies.
The move has sparked outrage among artists who have previously clashed with Trump over his use of their music. Last month, Olivia Rodrigo spoke out against the White House and DHS for using her song "All-American Bitch" in a video about self-deportation, calling it "racist and hateful propaganda." It appears that Rodrigo's warning may not have served as an effective deterrent, with the Trump administration opting to use Carpenter's music in a similar vein.
The incident highlights the Trump administration's long-standing disregard for artists' wishes regarding their work. As noted by the article, Donald Trump's presidency has seen numerous instances of artists speaking out against his usage of their music, from CΓ©line Dion to the family of Isaac Hayes. The White House appears to be emboldened in its efforts to exploit popular songs for its own purposes, without regard for the original creators' intentions or feelings.
The use of Carpenter's song "Juno" in this context raises serious questions about artistic ownership and the exploitation of creative work for propaganda purposes. As one would expect from an artist who has spoken out against Trump's misuse of her music, Sabrina Carpenter is likely to denounce the White House's actions as a despicable act of cultural appropriation and intellectual property theft.
However, it is a far cry from the lighthearted fun that Carpenter intended when she first shared the song with her fans. Instead, the White House seems to have co-opted "Juno" for its own propaganda purposes, effectively using Carpenter's carefree vibe to normalize the brutal enforcement of immigration policies.
The move has sparked outrage among artists who have previously clashed with Trump over his use of their music. Last month, Olivia Rodrigo spoke out against the White House and DHS for using her song "All-American Bitch" in a video about self-deportation, calling it "racist and hateful propaganda." It appears that Rodrigo's warning may not have served as an effective deterrent, with the Trump administration opting to use Carpenter's music in a similar vein.
The incident highlights the Trump administration's long-standing disregard for artists' wishes regarding their work. As noted by the article, Donald Trump's presidency has seen numerous instances of artists speaking out against his usage of their music, from CΓ©line Dion to the family of Isaac Hayes. The White House appears to be emboldened in its efforts to exploit popular songs for its own purposes, without regard for the original creators' intentions or feelings.
The use of Carpenter's song "Juno" in this context raises serious questions about artistic ownership and the exploitation of creative work for propaganda purposes. As one would expect from an artist who has spoken out against Trump's misuse of her music, Sabrina Carpenter is likely to denounce the White House's actions as a despicable act of cultural appropriation and intellectual property theft.