Speed cameras are coming to Oakland starting in January

Oakland is set to become one of California's newest cities with speed cameras starting next month, but don't expect them to start handing out tickets right away. The city plans to install 18 speed cameras across Oakland, with the goal of having all of them operational by mid-January.

According to city officials, intersections were chosen based on crash history and speeding data, in an effort to crack down on speeding drivers. This strategy is similar to one used in San Francisco, where speed cameras have been implemented and proven effective. In just a few months, the SF cameras have issued tens of thousands of citations, with speeding activity decreasing by 72% across 15 intersections.

Oakland hopes to see a similar drop in speeding activity once their cameras are up and running. However, unlike San Francisco, Oakland will not start issuing tickets right away. Instead, drivers will receive warnings for 60 days before the city begins handing out fines.

While some have expressed concerns about the impact of speed cameras on traffic flow, city officials say they see a potential benefit in reducing speeding and increasing safety on Oakland's streets. As with San Francisco, Oakland is hoping to use the revenue generated from citations to improve its transportation infrastructure.

Speed cameras in Oakland ... it's like, do we really need them to make our roads safer? I mean, what's the real value of a quick fine vs. the chance to slow down and actually be present on the road? We're so used to being in a rush, we forget that life's not a sprint. And yet, here we are, racing towards some sort of utopia where speed is the ultimate goal . Is it worth it though? I think about all the people who get caught up in this endless cycle of hurry-up and slow down, never really taking time to breathe... we're just like our cars, always on the go, but what's the destination, anyway?

I don’t usually comment but I think it’s kinda weird that Oakland is doing this later than SF. Like, why wait 60 days for warnings when you know something’s not right? And isn’t it a bit too little, too late for some people who might've already gotten hurt on those roads? Still, I guess it’s better than nothing... and if it helps get more cash to fix the streets, that's a good thing .

I'm literally so done with people speeding around like their life depends on it . I mean, come on, do they not care about putting innocent lives at risk? It's just common sense, folks! And now that Oakland is finally stepping up and installing these speed cameras, I'm all for it .

I can already imagine the thrill of watching speeding cars get a slap on the wrist (and eventually a fine) . And let's be real, 60 days of warnings? It's about time someone started cracking down on this reckless behavior! I mean, who needs to learn their lesson when they're about to get a nice fat fine for being a speed demon?

But seriously though, it's amazing how cities like San Francisco have already seen the effectiveness of these cameras. 72% less speeding activity in just a few months? That's what I call progress! And let's not forget about the revenue they'll be using to upgrade Oakland's infrastructure – it's a win-win for everyone . Bring on those speed cameras and let's make our streets safer once and for all

idk why oakland needs 18 speed cameras lol like san francisco already got their act together how much does it cost to install all these cameras anyway? i'm not buying that they're gonna reduce speeding by 72% just 'cause they say so... drivers are humans, we make mistakes and what's with the warning phase? sounds like a clever way to get people to slow down without actually doing anything about the root problem

I'm not sure if I agree with this move, but I guess it's worth trying to reduce speeding in Oakland . The idea of giving drivers 60 days' warning before they get fined might be a good compromise, but what about people who can't afford the fines or need to make a quick stop? It also raises questions about enforcement - will police officers be monitoring these cameras closely enough to ensure fairness?

I'm not sure I'm totally cool with this idea, you know? I mean, I get that speed cameras can be a good way to crack down on speeding and all, but do we really need them in Oakland too? I've seen how they work in San Francisco and while it's nice that speeding activity has gone down, isn't there something else they could've done instead? Like just, like, having more police presence or roadwork or something?

And another thing, what's up with the 60 day warning thing? It feels kinda arbitrary. Either we're gonna get tickets or we're not. I'm just trying to figure out the logic behind it all.

I'm telling ya, this speed camera thingy in Oakland is fishy ! First of all, why are they waiting 60 days for tickets? That's just giving drivers time to get comfortable speeding up again, you know what I mean? It's like they're testing the waters, making sure everyone gets used to the cameras before they start doling out fines. And what about the warnings, huh? Are those really just random citations or is there something more going on? I'm thinking it's all part of some bigger plan to control our minds... err, I mean, slow us down

"The die has been cast" – we're going to be seeing more speed cameras popping up across Oakland in the coming months. Hopefully, it'll really make a difference in reducing speeding and making our roads safer . Not everyone's gonna love it, but if it means fewer accidents, I'm all for it .

Just got wind of this news and I gotta say, speed cameras are definitely a step in the right direction! I mean, it's about time we take speeding seriously and make our roads safer for everyone . San Francisco is proof that these cameras can work wonders - 72% less speeding activity? That's crazy! And let's be real, who doesn't want to see more money go towards fixing our roads and making them better? I'm all for Oakland giving it a try and seeing what works best for their community . Plus, the warning period before fines is a great way to make sure people know they're being watched . Fingers crossed these cameras bring some much-needed change to Oakland's streets!

Speed cameras are coming to Oakland , but not without some caveats... First off, I'm all for safer roads, no doubt about it. But 60 days of warnings before fines? That's just too long. It feels like a tease, you know? "Hey, slow down, we're watching you..." Then nothing happens. Meanwhile, drivers are still speeding and putting lives at risk.

And don't even get me started on the revenue aspect . I'm not sure that using ticket money to improve infrastructure is the best use of it. It's like just shifting the problem around. Can't they just fix the roads in the first place instead of relying on fines?

I'm low-key hyped about the new speed cameras in Oakland ! I mean, who doesn't want safer roads, right? But seriously, it's great that they're taking a thoughtful approach and giving people a heads up before issuing fines. 60 days is definitely doable for most folks to adjust their driving habits. Plus, the data from San Francisco suggests this can make a big difference in reducing speeding and crashes. I'm all about exploring innovative solutions to improve our communities . Now, let's see how it plays out in Oakland!

Speed Cameras are coming to Oakland ! Did you know that 65% of all traffic fatalities occur at speeds over 35mph? That's where these cameras come in – they're gonna help reduce speeding and keep our streets safer. The city chose intersections with the highest crash rates, kinda like San Francisco did too . They got a 72% drop in speeding activity after implementing cameras there! Oakland hopes to achieve similar results, but no tickets for now – 60 days of warnings first . Let's keep it safe and on track

I don’t usually comment but... I think this is kinda weird that Oakland is waiting 60 days before starting to fine people for speeding . I mean, I get it, they want to give drivers a chance to adjust and stuff, but what if someone's just gonna ignore the warnings? It feels like they're giving speeders an open ticket... er, warning . On the other hand, I do hope this helps reduce the number of crashes on Oakland’s streets – those cameras can only be good for safety . Maybe it's a good idea to use that revenue to fix up some of the city's rough roads too? That would be a win-win

I remember when I used to drive around San Francisco with my friends back in the day ... anyway, so these speed cameras are coming to Oakland and everyone's all worried about it. Like, I get it, they wanna keep our streets safe, but can't we just slow down a bit naturally? Don't need some camera watching us all the time. And 60 days without tickets? That sounds like plenty of time for people to adjust their speed... or not . But hey, if it works out in SF, maybe it'll work here too. Just hope they don't cause more traffic jams than they solve... fingers crossed!

I think it's pretty cool that Oakland is getting speed cameras ! The idea of using data to identify super-speedy drivers and crack down on speeding makes sense . Plus, using the revenue to improve infrastructure is a solid plan . Only thing is, what if people get frustrated with all these warning signs for 60 days straight? Still, I guess it's better than nothing!

Speed cameras are definitely gonna be a game changer in Oakland, I think it's pretty smart of them to give drivers a heads up before dishing out fines . I mean, who doesn't want to avoid getting a ticket? But seriously, with the goal of reducing speeding and increasing safety, I'm all for it .

I can see how the 60-day warning period is gonna be helpful in easing drivers into the system, especially since some people might get caught off guard . And hey, if it works out like San Francisco did, who knows, Oakland's streets could be safer and more efficient in no time .

One thing that's got me thinking is how they're choosing intersections for the cameras – based on crash history and speeding data? Makes sense to me . I'm curious to see if it really does make a difference in slowing down speeding drivers

just thinkin', if they can reduce speeding by 72% in SF, why not Oakland? they're doin' the same thing here, choosin' spots with a history of crashes and speedin'. it's all about makin' our streets safer . and hey, if it works, more power to 'em! just hope they don't get too much flak for implementin' this. 60 days of warnings seems like a good compromise

I'm not sure I fully get why they're waiting 60 days to start fining people who are speeding like it's gonna make a huge difference . Don't get me wrong, I think speed cameras can be super helpful in reducing accidents and all that, but I've lived in Oakland for ages and I've never seen someone drive like a maniac on the streets here . It just seems like they're trying to ease people into it or something. Still, if it helps reduce speeding and makes our roads safer, then I'm all for it . And hey, if they can use that revenue to fix up our streets and make them more bike-friendly, then that's a definite plus ️.

I'm not sure if I'd be all for these new speed cameras in Oakland... They're saying it'll help reduce speeding and increase safety, which sounds good on paper, but what about the fine print? Like, how much are we talking about here? And how's that going to translate into actual improvements to our streets? I mean, San Francisco saw a 72% drop in speeding activity after implementing their cameras, but was that just because they issued warnings before tickets were handed out or did it really have something to do with the cameras themselves? Oakland needs to make sure they're doing their research and not just relying on what worked in SF. We need to see some solid data on how these cameras are actually going to benefit our city, you know?