The OBR's exit may ease pressure on Rachel Reeves but the battle isn't over yet.
The sudden resignation of Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) chief Richard Hughes has undoubtedly provided some temporary respite to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who had been under intense scrutiny following the budget's accidental publication. However, this reprieve is short-lived as the government now faces a daunting task in finding and appointing a suitable replacement for Hughes.
The drama surrounding Hughes' departure has raised concerns about the credibility of the OBR's forecasts and its ability to provide independent advice to the government. The OBR's own letter, which was delayed by the chaos surrounding the budget, revealed weeks of pent-up frustration within the institution. The letter criticized Reeves' plans for raising taxes and cutting spending, arguing that they were unrealistic given the shaky state of public finances.
The leak has also raised questions about the level of influence exerted by government insiders over the OBR's work. The Chancellor's office was accused of trying to shape the OBR's forecasts, which further eroded trust in the institution. Hughes' departure may be seen as a victory for the Chancellor's office, but it is unlikely to last.
The search for a new OBR chief is already underway, with several candidates emerging, including Clare Lombardelli, Carl Emmerson, and Conrad Smewing. However, whoever takes on the role will face significant challenges in asserting their independence from government pressure. Investors in bond markets, which have been unimpressed by the leak farrago, will be watching closely to ensure that the new OBR chief has the credibility and independence needed to provide reliable forecasts.
Ultimately, the battle between the Chancellor's office and the OBR is far from over. The stakes are high, with the government facing intense scrutiny over its fiscal plans. Only time will tell whether a new OBR chief can restore trust in the institution and provide credible forecasts that support the government's policies.
The sudden resignation of Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) chief Richard Hughes has undoubtedly provided some temporary respite to Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who had been under intense scrutiny following the budget's accidental publication. However, this reprieve is short-lived as the government now faces a daunting task in finding and appointing a suitable replacement for Hughes.
The drama surrounding Hughes' departure has raised concerns about the credibility of the OBR's forecasts and its ability to provide independent advice to the government. The OBR's own letter, which was delayed by the chaos surrounding the budget, revealed weeks of pent-up frustration within the institution. The letter criticized Reeves' plans for raising taxes and cutting spending, arguing that they were unrealistic given the shaky state of public finances.
The leak has also raised questions about the level of influence exerted by government insiders over the OBR's work. The Chancellor's office was accused of trying to shape the OBR's forecasts, which further eroded trust in the institution. Hughes' departure may be seen as a victory for the Chancellor's office, but it is unlikely to last.
The search for a new OBR chief is already underway, with several candidates emerging, including Clare Lombardelli, Carl Emmerson, and Conrad Smewing. However, whoever takes on the role will face significant challenges in asserting their independence from government pressure. Investors in bond markets, which have been unimpressed by the leak farrago, will be watching closely to ensure that the new OBR chief has the credibility and independence needed to provide reliable forecasts.
Ultimately, the battle between the Chancellor's office and the OBR is far from over. The stakes are high, with the government facing intense scrutiny over its fiscal plans. Only time will tell whether a new OBR chief can restore trust in the institution and provide credible forecasts that support the government's policies.