US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem's decision to continue deporting Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador, despite a federal judge's directive to return them to the United States, was made at her own behest, according to a statement from the Department of Justice.
The department claimed that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove provided legal advice to Secretary Noem, advising her that detainees who had been removed from the US before the judge's order could be transferred to El Salvador. Following this guidance, Noem directed that these individuals be sent to the Central American country.
The Justice Department argued that its decision was lawful and aligned with a reasonable interpretation of the court's order. However, the department refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or contempt by the administration, claiming that the written order did not require the return of already-departed detainees and that the earlier oral directive was not a binding injunction.
A US district judge, James Boasberg, had recently resumed his investigation into whether the Trump administration violated his March orders to halt the deportation flights. The White House had initially claimed that the ruling did not apply to planes already in flight, allowing them to continue with deportations.
In a twist, the Venezuelan nationals were later repatriated to Venezuela in July as part of a deal between the US and Venezuelan governments. Despite this, the decision by Noem and the Department of Justice to continue the deportation flights remains contentious, with many questioning the administration's actions and potential disregard for federal law.
The department claimed that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove provided legal advice to Secretary Noem, advising her that detainees who had been removed from the US before the judge's order could be transferred to El Salvador. Following this guidance, Noem directed that these individuals be sent to the Central American country.
The Justice Department argued that its decision was lawful and aligned with a reasonable interpretation of the court's order. However, the department refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or contempt by the administration, claiming that the written order did not require the return of already-departed detainees and that the earlier oral directive was not a binding injunction.
A US district judge, James Boasberg, had recently resumed his investigation into whether the Trump administration violated his March orders to halt the deportation flights. The White House had initially claimed that the ruling did not apply to planes already in flight, allowing them to continue with deportations.
In a twist, the Venezuelan nationals were later repatriated to Venezuela in July as part of a deal between the US and Venezuelan governments. Despite this, the decision by Noem and the Department of Justice to continue the deportation flights remains contentious, with many questioning the administration's actions and potential disregard for federal law.