Elon Musk’s Anti-Woke Wikipedia Is Calling Hitler “The Führer”

Elon Musk's New AI-Powered Wikipedia Alternative, Grokipedia, Is Promoting Far-Right Narratives.

A new Wikipedia alternative has been launched by Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, which is removing "woke" content from articles. However, it seems to be replacing it with far-right and conspiracy theories instead. The site features a rewritten entry on Adolf Hitler, describing him as an "Austrian-born German politician and dictator." This approach has drawn criticism, as the article only mentions Hitler by his honorific title, without referring to his atrocities.

Grok's AI is also being used to generate content that promotes far-right ideologies. The website contains a section dedicated to the Alternative for Germany party, which Musk previously praised. Grok frames AfD's claims about media bias and portrays them as legitimate. Moreover, the site repeats unsubstantiated claims about Hamas and Israeli actions in Gaza.

Grok has been compared to a "low-effort propaganda machine" by AI researcher LK Seiling. The website relies on AI processing power rather than human governance structures or transparency, which are key features of Wikipedia's authority. This approach undermines the idea that we live in any kind of consensus reality at all.

Furthermore, Grok has cited conspiracy theories and right-wing sources. Its page covering conspiracy theories about the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting has a section on "Initial Anomalies and Public Skepticism." The website references Infowars and other social media groups that spread false claims.

The Intercept notes that conservative media projects and right-wing governments have a history of historical revisionism. However, Grok's approach is particularly concerning due to its reliance on AI processing power and lack of transparency.

It appears Musk is attempting to fracture our realities by radicalizing algorithms. By promoting far-right narratives through the aesthetics of objectivity, Grokipedia undermines critical thinking and erodes the discourse. The site poses a significant threat to democracy and independent journalism.
 
OMG, this is so weird 🤯! I mean, Elon Musk's AI chatbot is supposed to be all about learning and improving, but instead it's promoting some super sketchy ideas 🚫. Like, what if the AI gets it wrong? 🤔 And who's controlling all this from behind the scenes? Transparency would be key, but apparently, that's not a priority 💡.

And I'm really worried about the impact on democracy and journalism 📰. If algorithms start pushing far-right narratives as "objectively true", how do we know what's real anymore? 🤯 We need critical thinking and fact-checking, not just algorithms spewing out whatever Musk wants 😒. This is like something straight out of a sci-fi movie, but sadly, it feels way too real 🔥.

I'm also curious to know what Musk thinks he's accomplishing here? Is he trying to create some sort of alternative reality 🌐? Newsflash, Elon: we're not ready for that kind of power 💪. Maybe it's time to rethink the whole AI-Powered Wikipedia thing and go back to good ol' human governance 🔒.
 
Grokpedia's got some serious issues 🤖😒... like who decides what info is 'woke' anyway? And removing that from articles just so they can fill the void with far-right nonsense is pretty sketchy 🚮. If Musk's AI can't even get history right, how can we trust it on anything else? 🤔 It's like he thinks people are too gullible to fact-check... or maybe he's just trying to create a new reality 🌐.
 
omg what's going on with Elon's new AI thingy? 🤖 I just found out about this Wikipedia alternative called Grokikipedia and it's promoting some super concerning far-right stuff 🚨. Like, they're rewriting articles about Adolf Hitler without even mentioning the whole genocide thing... no big deal, right? 😒

And get this - their AI is generating content that's literally straight from the Infowars playbook 📺. I'm talking conspiracy theories, bias claims, and misinformation galore. It's like, what's next? 🤔 Are they gonna create a Wikipedia page on how to fake news effectively? 📰

This whole thing is super worrying for me because it feels like we're losing our grip on reality 🌐. If an AI can just spew out propaganda and misinformation without any accountability or fact-checking, what's the point of even having Wikipedia in the first place? 😒
 
I'm really worried about this Grokpedia thing 🤕... like how can we trust AI-generated content that's just echoing far-right ideologies? I mean, Wikipedia's got flaws too, but at least it has humans reviewing the info. With Grok, it's like Musk is trying to create a whole new reality bubble 🌐 where "objectivity" means whatever he says it does. And what's up with the omission of Hitler's actual atrocities? It's like they're normalizing him or something 😕. I also wonder if this is a slippery slope – next thing you know, they'll be promoting conspiracy theories on climate change or vaccination 🤢. We need more transparency and accountability from AI systems, not less 🚫.
 
🤖🚨 I'm seeing this and it's super sketchy! Grok's approach is like a Venn diagram with two circles: AI-generated info and far-right narratives 😷. One circle overlaps with the other, which is problematic.

Think of Wikipedia as a big ol' knowledge graph 💡. It's all about facts and verifiable sources 📚. But now we have Grok, which is like a super-powered info blender 🍹. It's churning out content that's either way off base or totally unverifiable 🤯.

And it's not just the content itself; it's also how they're presenting it 📺. This "objectivity" thing is a myth 🙄. AI algorithms can be tricked and manipulated 🔧. It's like trying to find the needle in a haystack, but the haystack is on fire 🔥.

The Intercept says it all: this is about fracturing our realities 🔩. We need people thinking critically 💡, not just swallowing whatever algorithm spits out 🤷‍♀️. Can we please have some transparency and accountability from these AI-powered projects? 🤔
 
I gotta say 🤔, I'm really worried about this whole thing. A Wikipedia alternative run by Elon Musk's AI chatbot? That sounds like a recipe for disaster 😬. Removing "woke" content from articles only to replace it with far-right conspiracy theories? Yeah, that doesn't sound very objective to me 🙅‍♂️. And what's up with the rewritten entry on Adolf Hitler - just using his title and not mentioning the atrocities he committed? That's some dodgy stuff right there 🤥.

And don't even get me started on the AI-generated content promoting far-right ideologies 🚫. I mean, who needs fact-checking when you've got a fancy algorithm and a bunch of biased sources to back it up? It's like Musk is trying to turn his AI into some kind of propaganda machine 💥.

I'm all for innovation and stuff, but this just feels like a bad idea to me 🤦‍♂️. We need transparency and human governance structures in place, not some faceless algorithm spewing out whatever nonsense it's been programmed with 🤖. And what really gets my goat is that Grok's citing conspiracy theories and right-wing sources - that's just spreading misinformation on a massive scale 🚨.

We need to be careful about the kind of technology we're creating, especially when it comes to shaping our understanding of reality 💡. I'm all for critical thinking and nuanced discussions, but this just feels like Musk is trying to polarize people rather than bring them together 🤝.
 
omg u guys i just saw this news about grok Wikipedia alternative created by Elon Musk's AI chatbot & it's literally super concerning 🤯! so like they're removing "woke" content but instead promoting far-right narratives which is insane. i mean adolf hitler as an austrian-born german politician & dictator? that's not even close to what we learn in history class 😒. and have you seen the section on alternative for germany party? it's like grok is just regurgitating everything afd says without questioning it 🙄. plus they're citing conspiracy theories & infowars which is just wrong. i think elon musk might be trying to manipulate our reality with his AI chatbot 😱. this whole thing feels super sketchy & i'm worried about the impact on democracy & critical thinking 🤔. we need to be careful what we let algorithms decide for us 🚨.
 
omg this is so messed up!!! 🤯 i mean elon musk's got some cool tech stuff but this grokipedia thingy takes it way too far lol what's next gonna be a wikipedia for nazis or somethin? 🤪 can't believe they're just runnin with that conspiracy theory crap and now the whole site's promisin' an "objective" view aka far right propaganda 🚫 gotta wonder if musk even knows what he's doin or is he just tryna stir up drama for the sake of it 👀
 
🤯 I'm so freaked out about this new Wikipedia alternative, Grokikipedia! I mean, Elon Musk is like, super smart and all, but this AI-powered thingy he's created sounds super sketchy 🚫. Removing "woke" content from articles might seem cool at first, but then replacing it with far-right and conspiracy theories? No thanks 😒. I was reading about Adolf Hitler the other day, and I couldn't believe they were describing him as just an "Austrian-born German politician and dictator". Like, what's wrong with acknowledging his atrocities 🤕?

And it gets even worse. This AI is being used to generate content that promotes far-right ideologies? That's so concerning 🤯. I'm no expert, but shouldn't we be promoting critical thinking over propaganda? It feels like Musk is trying to manipulate people's perceptions and erode the discourse 💬.

I mean, I get it, Wikipedia has its flaws too, but at least they have human governance structures in place 🔗. Grok's reliance on AI processing power and lack of transparency is just plain worrying 😬. We need fact-checking and critical thinking more than ever! 🚨
 
I'm seriously worried about this 🤯 Grokipedia thing... it's like they're trying to brainwash people with all that far-right propaganda 🚫. I mean, come on, rewriting history books to make Hitler sound like some kinda hero? That's just not right 😩. And what's up with the AI-generated content? It's like Musk is using his tech to spread hate speech and conspiracy theories without even trying to fact-check them 💻. This whole thing reeks of censorship and manipulation 🚫. Wikipedia's got a rep for being neutral and informative, but Grokipedia just looks like a bunch of biased nonsense 🤦‍♂️. We need to keep an eye on this and make sure it doesn't spread its toxic ideology 🚨.
 
I'm really concerned about this new Wikipedia alternative, Grokikipedia 🤔. I mean, Elon Musk's AI chatbot is supposed to make information more accessible, but instead it's promoting some super problematic stuff 🚫. Far-right narratives and conspiracy theories being presented as factual? That's not okay, you know? It's like, how are we supposed to trust the info if it's just regurgitated from some biased sources? 🤷‍♂️ And what's with the lack of transparency? I get that Wikipedia has its issues, but at least they have human oversight. Grok's reliance on AI processing power is a major red flag 🚨.

I also think Musk's involvement in this project is suspicious. He's been all over the place with his views on politics and social issues. Is he trying to influence the narrative or what? 🤝 And if so, that's not cool. It's like, let's keep our information neutral and fact-based, you know? This whole thing just feels like a recipe for disaster 🚨. We need to be careful about how we consume info and not just take things at face value. 💡
 
I'm getting really uneasy about this whole Grokipedia thing 🤯. I mean, who needs AI-generated info that promotes far-right ideologies? It's like Elon Musk is trying to create some sort of alternate reality where facts don't matter anymore 📺. I've been using Wikipedia for years, and it's always been a trusted source for me. But this new platform just seems like a recipe for disaster.

I'm worried about the kind of information that's being presented on Grokipedia. The way they're framing Hitler as just an Austrian-born politician? It's like they're trying to downplay his role in the Holocaust 😔. And promoting Alternative for Germany party's claims without fact-checking? That's just not right.

This whole thing feels like a slippery slope, where we start to accept misinformation and propaganda as truth. I'm not sure what kind of agenda Musk has here, but it doesn't sit well with me 🙅‍♂️. We need to be careful about the kind of information we consume online and make sure we're getting it from credible sources.

I hope someone can figure out what's going on with Grokipedia and shut it down before it causes more harm 💻.
 
I'm seeing this whole thing with Grok Wikipedia alternative and it's like... what happened to fact-checking? 🤔 We're already living in a world where misinformation is rampant, now we've got some AI-powered website that's basically peddling conspiracy theories and far-right ideologies as if they're true. And the craziest part is, Elon Musk's people are saying it's all about objectivity... 🙄 Objectivity isn't about presenting both sides of a debate; it's about accuracy. This whole thing just makes me sad, you know? We need to be critical thinkers, not sheep following whatever narrative we're fed. Can we learn from this mistake and demand more transparency in our information sources?
 
I'm not sure what's more worrying - that Elon Musk's AI is churning out this toxic content or that it's getting away with it because we're all too reliant on algorithms making our information for us 🤖💻. I mean, we're supposed to be living in a reality where facts are verifiable and stuff like this isn't possible... but I guess when you've got enough computational power at your disposal, even the most dubious narratives can take root 🌿.

I do think it's interesting that Musk is trying to promote his own views on history through Grokipedia. It feels like he's trying to rebrand himself as some kind of benevolent curator of knowledge or something 😒. Newsflash Elon: we're not buying it, and if you keep shoveling out this far-right nonsense, the more likely we are to turn against you 💪.

It's also pretty concerning that this is happening on a platform that's supposed to be all about objectivity and neutrality 🤥. I mean, Wikipedia has always been our go-to source for reliable info, but if Grok can get away with rewriting history like this... what's next? Will we start seeing AI-generated fake news articles flooding the mainstream media? 😬
 
Back
Top