US Immigration Policy Under Scrutiny as Trump Seeks to Tighten Rules
A devastating shooting at a US military base in Maryland, which left two soldiers dead and another injured, has been seized upon by President Donald Trump as an opportunity to press his hardline immigration agenda. In response to the attack, Trump directed the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to pause all pending asylum applications, marking a significant shift in the agency's approach.
The move is part of a broader effort to crack down on asylum seekers from certain countries, with the administration citing concerns over national security and public safety. The USCIS has announced plans to pause consideration of approximately 1.5 million pending asylum claims, while also reviewing the immigration benefits of migrants from 19 "high-risk" countries.
Citizens or nationals from these countries, which include Afghanistan, Burundi, Chad, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Togo, Turkmenistan, Venezuela, and Yemen, will no longer be eligible for work authorizations, green cards, naturalization, or sponsor visas for family members. This change has far-reaching implications, potentially blocking thousands of migrants from accessing essential services.
Furthermore, the USCIS has ordered a "comprehensive re-review" of applications submitted by migrants from these 19 countries since January 2021, when Joe Biden took office. This review will involve checking applicants' identities and screening databases to assess any potential national security or public safety threats.
Critics argue that this move is an attempt by the Trump administration to bypass due process and disproportionately target vulnerable populations. Denise Gilman, co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Texas in Austin, has expressed concerns over the cost and resource-intensive nature of these investigations, suggesting that they may be challenged in federal court.
As the impact of these changes becomes clear, it is likely to have significant consequences for migrants seeking to access immigration benefits. With a prolonged pause on asylum claims and an increased scrutiny of migration applications, thousands of people will face uncertainty and potential delays in accessing essential services.
A devastating shooting at a US military base in Maryland, which left two soldiers dead and another injured, has been seized upon by President Donald Trump as an opportunity to press his hardline immigration agenda. In response to the attack, Trump directed the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to pause all pending asylum applications, marking a significant shift in the agency's approach.
The move is part of a broader effort to crack down on asylum seekers from certain countries, with the administration citing concerns over national security and public safety. The USCIS has announced plans to pause consideration of approximately 1.5 million pending asylum claims, while also reviewing the immigration benefits of migrants from 19 "high-risk" countries.
Citizens or nationals from these countries, which include Afghanistan, Burundi, Chad, Cuba, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Togo, Turkmenistan, Venezuela, and Yemen, will no longer be eligible for work authorizations, green cards, naturalization, or sponsor visas for family members. This change has far-reaching implications, potentially blocking thousands of migrants from accessing essential services.
Furthermore, the USCIS has ordered a "comprehensive re-review" of applications submitted by migrants from these 19 countries since January 2021, when Joe Biden took office. This review will involve checking applicants' identities and screening databases to assess any potential national security or public safety threats.
Critics argue that this move is an attempt by the Trump administration to bypass due process and disproportionately target vulnerable populations. Denise Gilman, co-director of the Immigration Clinic at the University of Texas in Austin, has expressed concerns over the cost and resource-intensive nature of these investigations, suggesting that they may be challenged in federal court.
As the impact of these changes becomes clear, it is likely to have significant consequences for migrants seeking to access immigration benefits. With a prolonged pause on asylum claims and an increased scrutiny of migration applications, thousands of people will face uncertainty and potential delays in accessing essential services.