"We're Doing Harm": RFK Jr.'s Bid to Gut Universal Hep B Vaccination at Birth Sparks Global Outrage
The US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has voted to dismantle a cornerstone of public health policy, sparking widespread outrage among medical professionals and experts worldwide. The decision paves the way for Robert F Kennedy Jr., the new head of Health and Human Services, to implement a radical shift in vaccine recommendations.
According to sources close to the ACIP process, the committee's majority vote effectively overturned decades of consensus on universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. The move has been described as a "gutting" of the country's public health pillars by medical professionals.
Critics argue that Kennedy and his allies have used their influence to undermine evidence-based decision-making on vaccine policy, with some members of the ACIP having ties to anti-vaccination groups or financial interests in vaccine manufacturers. The new chair of the ACIP, Kirk Milhoan, has made questionable statements about vaccines, including falsely claiming that COVID-19 vaccines increase cancer cases and miscarriages.
The shift in vaccine recommendations is expected to have devastating consequences for public health, particularly among children who are more vulnerable to contracting hepatitis B due to maternal transmission. Medical experts warn that delaying or removing universal vaccination at birth could result in a significant increase in acute and chronic infections, as well as child deaths.
Many medical societies, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), continue to endorse universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. Some states have already signaled their intention to resist the ACIP's new guidelines, citing concerns about the potential harm to public health.
As Kennedy begins his reshaping of vaccine policy, many are left wondering what other radical changes he has in store for the country's healthcare system. The decision by the ACIP is a stark reminder that the influence of misinformation and ideology can have far-reaching consequences for human health.
The US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has voted to dismantle a cornerstone of public health policy, sparking widespread outrage among medical professionals and experts worldwide. The decision paves the way for Robert F Kennedy Jr., the new head of Health and Human Services, to implement a radical shift in vaccine recommendations.
According to sources close to the ACIP process, the committee's majority vote effectively overturned decades of consensus on universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. The move has been described as a "gutting" of the country's public health pillars by medical professionals.
Critics argue that Kennedy and his allies have used their influence to undermine evidence-based decision-making on vaccine policy, with some members of the ACIP having ties to anti-vaccination groups or financial interests in vaccine manufacturers. The new chair of the ACIP, Kirk Milhoan, has made questionable statements about vaccines, including falsely claiming that COVID-19 vaccines increase cancer cases and miscarriages.
The shift in vaccine recommendations is expected to have devastating consequences for public health, particularly among children who are more vulnerable to contracting hepatitis B due to maternal transmission. Medical experts warn that delaying or removing universal vaccination at birth could result in a significant increase in acute and chronic infections, as well as child deaths.
Many medical societies, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), continue to endorse universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. Some states have already signaled their intention to resist the ACIP's new guidelines, citing concerns about the potential harm to public health.
As Kennedy begins his reshaping of vaccine policy, many are left wondering what other radical changes he has in store for the country's healthcare system. The decision by the ACIP is a stark reminder that the influence of misinformation and ideology can have far-reaching consequences for human health.