Asylum Seekers Struggle to Survive on Nauru's Meager Allowance
Day by day, these individuals are forced to make impossible choices about how to spend their dwindling allowance. A $230 fortnight stipend is barely enough to cover the basics, but on an island where a bag of grapes costs $20 and a quarter-sliced watermelon $24, it's clear that something has to give.
The Australian government's policy prohibits asylum seekers from working, claiming it's to prevent them from accessing better-paid jobs. However, this effectively leaves them with no means to support themselves. Many are forced to turn to illicit work on construction sites or petrol stations just to put food on the table.
"We cannot survive on the $230 per fortnight allowance," says one asylum seeker, who wishes to remain anonymous. "The money is not enough because everything is expensive here β rice, fish, we cannot buy any fruit here, internet for $100 per month. How is it possible to survive?"
As a result, many are losing weight and suffering from poor health due to the lack of nutritious food. One asylum seeker confides that he can only afford two meals a day, and has even resorted to skipping breakfast in order to make ends meet.
A bag of grapes, which costs $20 on Nauru, is a luxury few can afford. A quarter-sliced watermelon retails for $24, while small boxes of cereal cost $15. The high prices are unsustainable for many asylum seekers, who are already struggling to cope with the lack of basic necessities.
The pressure on these vulnerable individuals is exacerbated by the threat of forcible deportation to a hostile country of origin if their protection claim is not accepted. Many fear that they will be returned to countries where they have fled persecution and violence, putting their lives at risk.
"It's unconscionable" says Ogy Simic, advocacy head of the Asylum Seekers Resource Centre, "that asylum seekers are being punished for doing what any of us would do in the same situation." He calls on Australia and Nauru to ensure that asylum seekers have access to work, food, and basic human dignity.
The UN human rights committee has also ruled that Australia remains responsible for upholding the non-refoulement rights of asylum seekers sent to Nauru. This raises serious questions about the morality of the Australian government's policy and its willingness to prioritize economic interests over human lives.
As the situation on Nauru continues to deteriorate, it is clear that something needs to be done to address the dire living conditions faced by these individuals. The Australian government must take immediate action to ensure that asylum seekers have access to basic necessities, including food, work opportunities, and protection from persecution. Anything less would be a betrayal of their human rights.
Day by day, these individuals are forced to make impossible choices about how to spend their dwindling allowance. A $230 fortnight stipend is barely enough to cover the basics, but on an island where a bag of grapes costs $20 and a quarter-sliced watermelon $24, it's clear that something has to give.
The Australian government's policy prohibits asylum seekers from working, claiming it's to prevent them from accessing better-paid jobs. However, this effectively leaves them with no means to support themselves. Many are forced to turn to illicit work on construction sites or petrol stations just to put food on the table.
"We cannot survive on the $230 per fortnight allowance," says one asylum seeker, who wishes to remain anonymous. "The money is not enough because everything is expensive here β rice, fish, we cannot buy any fruit here, internet for $100 per month. How is it possible to survive?"
As a result, many are losing weight and suffering from poor health due to the lack of nutritious food. One asylum seeker confides that he can only afford two meals a day, and has even resorted to skipping breakfast in order to make ends meet.
A bag of grapes, which costs $20 on Nauru, is a luxury few can afford. A quarter-sliced watermelon retails for $24, while small boxes of cereal cost $15. The high prices are unsustainable for many asylum seekers, who are already struggling to cope with the lack of basic necessities.
The pressure on these vulnerable individuals is exacerbated by the threat of forcible deportation to a hostile country of origin if their protection claim is not accepted. Many fear that they will be returned to countries where they have fled persecution and violence, putting their lives at risk.
"It's unconscionable" says Ogy Simic, advocacy head of the Asylum Seekers Resource Centre, "that asylum seekers are being punished for doing what any of us would do in the same situation." He calls on Australia and Nauru to ensure that asylum seekers have access to work, food, and basic human dignity.
The UN human rights committee has also ruled that Australia remains responsible for upholding the non-refoulement rights of asylum seekers sent to Nauru. This raises serious questions about the morality of the Australian government's policy and its willingness to prioritize economic interests over human lives.
As the situation on Nauru continues to deteriorate, it is clear that something needs to be done to address the dire living conditions faced by these individuals. The Australian government must take immediate action to ensure that asylum seekers have access to basic necessities, including food, work opportunities, and protection from persecution. Anything less would be a betrayal of their human rights.