The New Yorker at 100: Netflix documentary dives inside a groundbreaking magazine

"Inside the World's Most Curated Publication: The New Yorker at 100"

For nearly a century, The New Yorker has been a beacon of sophistication and intellectual curiosity in an increasingly chaotic world. But what makes this venerable magazine tick? And how does it manage to remain essential to its devoted readership?

As filmmaker Marshall Curry delves into the archives and observes the inner workings of the magazine, he discovers that the secret to its success lies not in flashy gimmicks or trendy trends, but in a profound commitment to quality and craftsmanship. From its early days as a provocative "funny paper" with a Mad Magazine-style irreverence, The New Yorker has evolved into a rigorous and authoritative voice on the world stage.

Curry's documentary film, "The New Yorker at 100," is a loving tribute to this unique institution. With Julianne Moore narrating and appearances by esteemed writers like Julian Fellowes, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, and Sarah Jessica Parker, the film offers a glimpse into the inner workings of the magazine, from its famous cartoonists like Roz Chast to its fact-checking department.

The documentary also explores the New Yorker's remarkable history, including its role in shaping American journalism. Truman Capote's infamous "In Cold Blood" piece not only launched the true-crime genre but also led to the establishment of a rigorous fact-checking department. Today, the magazine continues to uphold this high standard, with a keen eye for detail and an unwavering commitment to accuracy.

Yet, as the film reveals, there are also concerns about The New Yorker's future. Will it adapt to the changing media landscape and remain relevant to new generations of readers? Curry's answer is that the magazine will continue to thrive by staying true to its core values: quality, craftsmanship, and a commitment to excellence.

"Their small restaurant makes handmade sushi," Curry notes. "They're not trying to be McDonald's; they make it for people who love perfectly made sushi." With over 1.25 million subscribers, The New Yorker has proven that its model of carefully curated content can endure in an increasingly crowded and noisy world.

Ultimately, "The New Yorker at 100" is a testament to the power of editorial excellence and the enduring appeal of The New Yorker's unique voice. By examining this fascinating institution up close, Curry offers us a glimpse into a rarefied world that continues to captivate readers around the globe.
 
πŸ“° I think what really sets The New Yorker apart is its commitment to taking its time and getting things right. Like, they don't just publish anything - they have this super rigorous fact-checking process in place that's basically unmatched in the industry. And it shows! Their content is always so well-researched and thoughtful, even if it doesn't always make for exciting reading. πŸ€”

It's also interesting to see how they've managed to stay relevant over the years by sticking to their core values of quality and craftsmanship. I mean, sure, not every piece will be a home run, but that's part of what makes them so trusted and respected. And it's not like they're trying to appeal to everyone - they're actually pretty unapologetically themselves, which is part of their charm.

One thing that worries me is how the media landscape keeps changing, though. It feels like everyone's always looking for new ways to make a quick buck or get attention, and it can be hard for something like The New Yorker to stay ahead of the curve. But at the same time, I think their commitment to excellence is actually what will help them adapt in the long run - they're not trying to chase trends, they're just focusing on doing what they do best.

It's also great to see that they've got this amazing team of writers and cartoonists who are all passionate about what they do. Like, Roz Chast is literally a legend, and it's awesome to see her up close in the documentary. πŸ€“ Overall, I think The New Yorker at 100 is a must-see for anyone who cares about great journalism and thoughtful storytelling! πŸ’‘
 
[Image of a person struggling to fit into a tiny box with a label that says "McDonald's" on it, with a big smile and hands stretched out for help]

[Image of a perfectly made sushi roll with chopsticks and a bowl of wasabi in the background]

[A GIF of a journalist working hard at their desk while a cartoon character (e.g. SpongeBob) in the corner says "Quality over Quantity"]

[Image of a person looking confused while surrounded by different types of media outlets, with a thought bubble saying "Which one is the real news?"]

[A GIF of Julianne Moore's voice as the narrator saying "the secret to their success lies not in flashy gimmicks or trendy trends" with a background image of The New Yorker magazine]

[Image of a person trying to take a selfie while holding up a small print copy of The New Yorker, with a caption that says "Still relevant and worth it"]
 
I gotta say, I'm totally inspired by The New Yorker's commitment to quality & craftsmanship 🀩 They're like the perfect handmade sushi restaurant - they don't try to be everyone else, they just focus on making something amazing for people who appreciate it. And that's what sets them apart from all the other publications out there. Marshall Curry did a great job documenting their history & values, it's really interesting to see how they've adapted over the years while still staying true to themselves. And you know what? I think that's the key to their success - not trying to keep up with the latest trends or gimmicks, but just being amazing at what they do πŸ’―
 
I mean, who wouldn't want to make handmade sushi when you've got 1.25 million people clamoring for it? The New Yorker's commitment to quality is like, totally admirable... from a safe distance, where they're still making all that perfectly crafted content without any, you know, actual pressure from the outside world πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. And honestly, I'm kinda impressed they haven't completely sold out yet, considering how much the media landscape has changed since Truman Capote's "In Cold Blood" days... still holds up pretty well, tbh πŸ’―
 
I don’t usually comment but I gotta say, The New Yorker is like the OG publication for intellectuals πŸ€“. It's crazy to think they've been around for 100 years and still manage to keep it real πŸ”₯. I mean, Truman Capote's "In Cold Blood" piece changed the game, no doubt about it πŸ’Ό. And Julianne Moore narrating the documentary is a nice touch 😊. But what really gets me is how they're not trying to be everything to everyone like some other publications πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. They just focus on creating high-quality content that resonates with their audience, and that's what sets them apart πŸ’―. The fact that Curry's documentary highlights the magazine's commitment to quality and craftsmanship is a big part of its enduring appeal πŸ“š.
 
I'm not sure if The New Yorker will be able to keep up with the fast-changing media landscape πŸ€”. They've been around for 100 years and have built this incredible reputation on quality and craftsmanship, but the world is moving so fast now πŸš€. I mean, they're still doing their fact-checking like a pro, which is super impressive πŸ’―, but will new readers even care about that when there's TikTok and Instagram all over their feeds? πŸ“±

I think the key to their success is that they've always been true to themselves, you know? They don't try to be something they're not πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. Their restaurant analogy is spot on - if you want perfectly made sushi, you have to be willing to pay for it πŸ’Έ. Same with The New Yorker, I guess - you have to be willing to invest time and effort into their content.

But what about the younger generation? Will they still care about in-depth analysis and literary fiction πŸ“š when there's so much more... shall we say, "entertaining" stuff out there? πŸŽ‰
 
I think what really resonates with me about The New Yorker is how it manages to stay true to itself even as the world outside changes so much. I mean, can you imagine trying to adapt and evolve while still maintaining that exact same tone and quality? It's like they're saying, "We may not be trendy anymore, but we're still the best, and that's okay." 🀩 And I love how Marshall Curry approaches this documentary with such respect and admiration for the magazine. It's clear he believes in what The New Yorker stands for, just like so many of us do. What I'd love to see is more documentaries like this one, showcasing other institutions and publications that are doing something special. We need more stories about the people and places that make our world a better place ❀️
 
im lovin how the new yorker has managed to stay relevant all these years, ya know? πŸ€” it's like they're doin their own thing and not tryna be everyone else. and its crazy how Truman capote's piece on in cold blood kinda launched the whole true crime genre lol. i feel like thats a big part of why the new yorker is still around. but at the same time, it makes me wonder if they're doin enough to adapt to changing times? will they stick to their guns and keep being all highbrow or try somethin new? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ either way, i think its cool that they're stayin true to themselves and not tryna be some flashy magazine.
 
the new yorker is like a fine wine 🍷 it only gets better with age...or should i say, more pretentious πŸ˜‚ seriously tho, what's up with all the big names narrating this doc? julianne moore and chimamanda adichie are cool and all, but can't they just let marshall curry do his thing? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ also, 1.25 million subs is a decent number, but i still don't get why people pay to read articles that are only slightly more interesting than the ones on wikipedia... πŸ€”
 
πŸ“° I think what's really interesting about The New Yorker is how it's managed to stay relevant for so long by not trying to be everything to everyone πŸ€”. Like, they're not just a bunch of trendy articles or fluff pieces - they actually put a lot of effort into producing high-quality content that's thought-provoking and nuanced. And I love how they're committed to accuracy and fact-checking, it shows that they're not afraid to take risks and challenge the status quo πŸ’ͺ.

And I think what's really cool is how they've built this community around their magazine - like, over 1.25 million subscribers and all these amazing cartoonists and writers contributing their work πŸ“. It's clear that they value quality and craftsmanship above all else, which is something we could all learn from in today's fast-paced and noisy world 🌎.

I also appreciate how the documentary highlights Truman Capote's "In Cold Blood" piece - it shows just how influential The New Yorker has been on American journalism and storytelling πŸ”. And with Julianne Moore narrating and appearances by some amazing writers, it sounds like a really engaging and informative film that's definitely worth checking out πŸŽ₯.
 
Back
Top