Alarm is growing among vaccine experts in the US after a high-ranking official made explosive claims about Covid vaccines, citing at least 10 child deaths despite lacking concrete evidence. Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Vinay Prasad's memo, obtained by The Guardian, promises to revamp vaccine regulation but has sparked widespread concern.
The memo's sensational claim – that Covid vaccines have killed more healthy children than they saved – is alarming and has raised questions about the scientific basis for such a statement. Experts point out that there is no evidence to support this assertion, and that Prasad failed to provide any details on the cases or how initial investigations ruled them unrelated.
"This kind of claim makes it hard to trust the evidence," said Dan Jernigan, former director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. "When you make such a claim without providing evidence, it's like throwing a dart at a board."
Myocarditis – an inflammatory condition of the heart – is one side effect highlighted in the memo, but experts note that this rare condition is much more common and severe with Covid infection than vaccination.
"It would be necessary to prove that myocarditis was caused by vaccination, not by infection," added Paul Offit, infectious diseases physician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. "You can't just assume it's from the vaccine without concrete evidence."
The memo has also raised concerns about the approach taken by the FDA, which is revising its guidelines on vaccine approvals and regulatory changes without consulting outside experts or publishing data.
"This is not how we do things here," said Offit. "It's highly unusual for the top vaccines regulator to share information like this in an email to all staff without first convening the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee."
The move has sparked worries that public trust will be severely damaged, leading to a decline in vaccine uptake and potentially putting lives at risk.
"The ultimate outcome will be fewer vaccines and more vaccine-preventable illnesses," warned Jernigan. "This approach is going to have serious consequences for public health."
Critics also point out that the memo has made nods to anti-vaccine activists' concerns, which is concerning given the lack of evidence supporting these claims.
"This kind of language could undermine confidence in vaccines and make it harder for the public to trust health agencies," said Dorit Reiss, professor of law at UC Hastings College of Law. "It's not a great time to take away influenza vaccines."
The confusion surrounding this memo has left many feeling uncertain about what evidence actually supports or contradicts vaccine claims.
"It's getting harder for them to know which recommendations to follow and who they can trust," said Jernigan.
The memo's sensational claim – that Covid vaccines have killed more healthy children than they saved – is alarming and has raised questions about the scientific basis for such a statement. Experts point out that there is no evidence to support this assertion, and that Prasad failed to provide any details on the cases or how initial investigations ruled them unrelated.
"This kind of claim makes it hard to trust the evidence," said Dan Jernigan, former director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. "When you make such a claim without providing evidence, it's like throwing a dart at a board."
Myocarditis – an inflammatory condition of the heart – is one side effect highlighted in the memo, but experts note that this rare condition is much more common and severe with Covid infection than vaccination.
"It would be necessary to prove that myocarditis was caused by vaccination, not by infection," added Paul Offit, infectious diseases physician at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. "You can't just assume it's from the vaccine without concrete evidence."
The memo has also raised concerns about the approach taken by the FDA, which is revising its guidelines on vaccine approvals and regulatory changes without consulting outside experts or publishing data.
"This is not how we do things here," said Offit. "It's highly unusual for the top vaccines regulator to share information like this in an email to all staff without first convening the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee."
The move has sparked worries that public trust will be severely damaged, leading to a decline in vaccine uptake and potentially putting lives at risk.
"The ultimate outcome will be fewer vaccines and more vaccine-preventable illnesses," warned Jernigan. "This approach is going to have serious consequences for public health."
Critics also point out that the memo has made nods to anti-vaccine activists' concerns, which is concerning given the lack of evidence supporting these claims.
"This kind of language could undermine confidence in vaccines and make it harder for the public to trust health agencies," said Dorit Reiss, professor of law at UC Hastings College of Law. "It's not a great time to take away influenza vaccines."
The confusion surrounding this memo has left many feeling uncertain about what evidence actually supports or contradicts vaccine claims.
"It's getting harder for them to know which recommendations to follow and who they can trust," said Jernigan.