Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces scrutiny over a potential breach in operational security, with an inspector general report concluding that his use of the encrypted messaging app Signal posed a risk to US servicemembers.
The report found that Hegseth shared sensitive details about planned strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen with two Signal groups, including one containing his wife and brother. Investigators determined that while no classified information was compromised, Hegseth's actions still created a risk to operational security, which could have resulted in failed mission objectives and harm to US pilots.
The watchdog noted that Hegseth declined to be interviewed and provided only limited responses, forcing investigators to rely on previously published screenshots. The Defense Secretary argued that he had the authority to declassify the information shared and suggested the probe was politically motivated.
However, Pentagon leadership has downplayed the findings, with Sean Parnell describing the review as a "total exoneration." In contrast, Democratic lawmakers have expressed outrage, citing staggering policy violations and concerns about Hegseth's fitness for office.
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) described Hegseth as "incompetent" and criticized his handling of sensitive information, while Sen. Mark Kelly stated that Hegseth should not be using an unofficial app to transmit such details. The report comes amid ongoing controversies surrounding Hegseth's tenure, including a series of personnel purges and intense criticism of his management style.
The incident raises questions about the Pentagon's security protocols and the use of personal devices for official business. As Hegseth faces increased scrutiny over his handling of sensitive information, lawmakers are likely to push for greater transparency and accountability in the Department of Defense.
The report found that Hegseth shared sensitive details about planned strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen with two Signal groups, including one containing his wife and brother. Investigators determined that while no classified information was compromised, Hegseth's actions still created a risk to operational security, which could have resulted in failed mission objectives and harm to US pilots.
The watchdog noted that Hegseth declined to be interviewed and provided only limited responses, forcing investigators to rely on previously published screenshots. The Defense Secretary argued that he had the authority to declassify the information shared and suggested the probe was politically motivated.
However, Pentagon leadership has downplayed the findings, with Sean Parnell describing the review as a "total exoneration." In contrast, Democratic lawmakers have expressed outrage, citing staggering policy violations and concerns about Hegseth's fitness for office.
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) described Hegseth as "incompetent" and criticized his handling of sensitive information, while Sen. Mark Kelly stated that Hegseth should not be using an unofficial app to transmit such details. The report comes amid ongoing controversies surrounding Hegseth's tenure, including a series of personnel purges and intense criticism of his management style.
The incident raises questions about the Pentagon's security protocols and the use of personal devices for official business. As Hegseth faces increased scrutiny over his handling of sensitive information, lawmakers are likely to push for greater transparency and accountability in the Department of Defense.