The United States is poised to lose its measles-free status next year, marking a significant shift in the country's approach to combating the highly contagious disease. The prospect of losing this status has serious implications, including increased hospitalizations, hearing loss, and even death, as well as substantial economic costs.
According to a new study, the public health response to outbreaks involving just a few cases can cost upwards of $244,000, while hospitalization costs average around $58,600 per case. In contrast, an outbreak similar to the one in West Texas earlier this year, with 762 cases and 99 hospitalizations, would have cost around $12.6 million.
The country's measles-free status hinges on whether the main outbreaks this year were linked to the large outbreak in West Texas that began on January 20. If these outbreaks are indeed connected, and continue through January 20 of next year, the U.S. will no longer be among nations that have eliminated the disease.
However, efforts to combat the resurgence of measles have been hindered by the actions of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a lawyer who founded an anti-vaccine organization before taking over as head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has undermined public health officials' ability to prevent and contain outbreaks by eroding trust in vaccines, despite overwhelming scientific evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective.
Only 4% of nearly 1,800 confirmed U.S. cases of measles this year have been in people who had received two doses. Kennedy has fired experts on the vaccine advisory committee to the CDC and has spread false claims about vaccines causing autism, brain swelling, and death.
The Trump administration appears to be more focused on downplaying the resurgence of measles than curbing the disease. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said that vaccination remains the most effective tool for preventing measles, but Kennedy's actions have cast doubt on this statement.
To determine whether outbreaks are linked, scientists are analyzing the genomes of measles viruses. This could reveal the origin of outbreaks and their true size, alerting officials to undetected spread. The CDC has also launched efforts to test sewage from households and buildings for measles viruses that infected people shed, which could function as an early warning system.
Despite the serious implications of losing its measles-free status, it remains uncertain whether the U.S. will indeed lose this status. Preliminary genomic analysis suggests that the outbreaks in Utah and Arizona are not directly linked to Texas, but further investigation is needed to confirm this.
The quiet research of CDC scientists stands in stark contrast to its lack of public-facing actions on the issue. The agency has not held a single press briefing on measles since President Donald Trump took office, and its last publication on measles was in April.
As the outbreak situation continues to evolve, it remains clear that the country's approach to combating measles is far from adequate. With the potential loss of its measles-free status looming, it is essential that public health officials take bold action to prevent and contain outbreaks, rather than relying on the actions of a single individual with little regard for scientific evidence.
According to a new study, the public health response to outbreaks involving just a few cases can cost upwards of $244,000, while hospitalization costs average around $58,600 per case. In contrast, an outbreak similar to the one in West Texas earlier this year, with 762 cases and 99 hospitalizations, would have cost around $12.6 million.
The country's measles-free status hinges on whether the main outbreaks this year were linked to the large outbreak in West Texas that began on January 20. If these outbreaks are indeed connected, and continue through January 20 of next year, the U.S. will no longer be among nations that have eliminated the disease.
However, efforts to combat the resurgence of measles have been hindered by the actions of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a lawyer who founded an anti-vaccine organization before taking over as head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has undermined public health officials' ability to prevent and contain outbreaks by eroding trust in vaccines, despite overwhelming scientific evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective.
Only 4% of nearly 1,800 confirmed U.S. cases of measles this year have been in people who had received two doses. Kennedy has fired experts on the vaccine advisory committee to the CDC and has spread false claims about vaccines causing autism, brain swelling, and death.
The Trump administration appears to be more focused on downplaying the resurgence of measles than curbing the disease. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said that vaccination remains the most effective tool for preventing measles, but Kennedy's actions have cast doubt on this statement.
To determine whether outbreaks are linked, scientists are analyzing the genomes of measles viruses. This could reveal the origin of outbreaks and their true size, alerting officials to undetected spread. The CDC has also launched efforts to test sewage from households and buildings for measles viruses that infected people shed, which could function as an early warning system.
Despite the serious implications of losing its measles-free status, it remains uncertain whether the U.S. will indeed lose this status. Preliminary genomic analysis suggests that the outbreaks in Utah and Arizona are not directly linked to Texas, but further investigation is needed to confirm this.
The quiet research of CDC scientists stands in stark contrast to its lack of public-facing actions on the issue. The agency has not held a single press briefing on measles since President Donald Trump took office, and its last publication on measles was in April.
As the outbreak situation continues to evolve, it remains clear that the country's approach to combating measles is far from adequate. With the potential loss of its measles-free status looming, it is essential that public health officials take bold action to prevent and contain outbreaks, rather than relying on the actions of a single individual with little regard for scientific evidence.