Fifa's New Peace Prize May Be A Sop To Trump, Critics Say
The timing of Gianni Infantino's announcement about Fifa launching its very own peace prize raised eyebrows among critics who fear it may be a sop to Donald Trump. The prize is scheduled to be awarded annually to individuals who help unite people in peace through unwavering commitment and special actions.
Infantino had already been accused of breaching Fifa's neutrality rules during an appearance next to his friend Trump at a Gaza peace summit. "I think we should all support what he's doing because I think it is looking pretty good," Infantino said, sparking criticism that he was undermining the integrity of the organisation.
A new social responsibility committee within Fifa has been tasked with devising the process for choosing winners, but its internal dynamics have raised concerns among critics. The chair of this committee is Zaw Zaw, a 59-year-old president of the Myanmar football federation who has been at odds with Western powers over his country's human rights record.
In 2009, US diplomatic cables described Zaw Zaw as "one of Burma's up-and-coming cronies" with interests in gems, cement, and bottling plants. The cables also revealed that he had hired the grandson of Myanmar's former dictator to play for one of his football teams, sparking allegations of corruption.
Critics argue that Fifa's peace prize is being used as a tool to curry favour with powerful leaders such as Trump and Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman, who will host the men's World Cup in 2034. "The only year Fifa makes money is in a men's World Cup year," said Nick McGeehan of FairSquare, a human rights advocacy group. "So every men's World Cup year, you need to squeeze as much money as possible out of your host."
McGeehan believes that Infantino's personal connection with Trump and his apparent willingness to overlook Fifa's neutrality rules demonstrate a lack of accountability within the organisation. "There's this incredible effort to sort of talk about transparency and accountability and all that," he said, "but not change the way it's actually done."
Stephen Cockburn, Amnesty International's head of labour rights and sport, echoed McGeehan's concerns, stating that while Fifa's rhetoric on human rights is admirable, its actions suggest a prioritisation of finance and power over people.
The timing of Gianni Infantino's announcement about Fifa launching its very own peace prize raised eyebrows among critics who fear it may be a sop to Donald Trump. The prize is scheduled to be awarded annually to individuals who help unite people in peace through unwavering commitment and special actions.
Infantino had already been accused of breaching Fifa's neutrality rules during an appearance next to his friend Trump at a Gaza peace summit. "I think we should all support what he's doing because I think it is looking pretty good," Infantino said, sparking criticism that he was undermining the integrity of the organisation.
A new social responsibility committee within Fifa has been tasked with devising the process for choosing winners, but its internal dynamics have raised concerns among critics. The chair of this committee is Zaw Zaw, a 59-year-old president of the Myanmar football federation who has been at odds with Western powers over his country's human rights record.
In 2009, US diplomatic cables described Zaw Zaw as "one of Burma's up-and-coming cronies" with interests in gems, cement, and bottling plants. The cables also revealed that he had hired the grandson of Myanmar's former dictator to play for one of his football teams, sparking allegations of corruption.
Critics argue that Fifa's peace prize is being used as a tool to curry favour with powerful leaders such as Trump and Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman, who will host the men's World Cup in 2034. "The only year Fifa makes money is in a men's World Cup year," said Nick McGeehan of FairSquare, a human rights advocacy group. "So every men's World Cup year, you need to squeeze as much money as possible out of your host."
McGeehan believes that Infantino's personal connection with Trump and his apparent willingness to overlook Fifa's neutrality rules demonstrate a lack of accountability within the organisation. "There's this incredible effort to sort of talk about transparency and accountability and all that," he said, "but not change the way it's actually done."
Stephen Cockburn, Amnesty International's head of labour rights and sport, echoed McGeehan's concerns, stating that while Fifa's rhetoric on human rights is admirable, its actions suggest a prioritisation of finance and power over people.