US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth could face a mountain of charges as the entire chain of command behind a double-tap strike on two survivors of a US boat attack in September could be held accountable for war crimes and murder.
The US military has carried out 21 strikes, killing at least 83 civilians, including alleged drug-traffickers. The Trump administration justifies these actions by claiming they are taking place within a "non-international armed conflict". However, most experts argue that the strikes are extrajudicial killings that breach international law.
Hegseth's actions could expose him and anyone who authorized or carried out the double-tap strike to prosecution under US law for murder. According to former military lawyers, subordinates would likely not be able to successfully use a "following-orders defense" if they were ordered by their superiors to kill civilians.
The Pentagon's Law of War Manual states that attacking defenceless people is against the rules. This principle dates back to the 1863 "Lieber Code", which held that intentionally inflicting additional wounds on an enemy already wholly disabled, or killing such an enemy, would result in death for those responsible.
Lawmakers and military experts are now calling for investigations into the strikes, with several agreeing that the attacks were illegal. The Trump administration insists they are defensible but are facing mounting criticism over their actions.
The US government's handling of these strikes raises concerns about the erosion of checks and balances on power within the executive branch. If left unchecked, this could lead to a catastrophic breakdown in democratic governance.
The situation highlights the need for an independent press that will not shy away from confronting authoritarian leaders and challenging them on human rights abuses. Without it, democracy itself is at risk.
The US military has carried out 21 strikes, killing at least 83 civilians, including alleged drug-traffickers. The Trump administration justifies these actions by claiming they are taking place within a "non-international armed conflict". However, most experts argue that the strikes are extrajudicial killings that breach international law.
Hegseth's actions could expose him and anyone who authorized or carried out the double-tap strike to prosecution under US law for murder. According to former military lawyers, subordinates would likely not be able to successfully use a "following-orders defense" if they were ordered by their superiors to kill civilians.
The Pentagon's Law of War Manual states that attacking defenceless people is against the rules. This principle dates back to the 1863 "Lieber Code", which held that intentionally inflicting additional wounds on an enemy already wholly disabled, or killing such an enemy, would result in death for those responsible.
Lawmakers and military experts are now calling for investigations into the strikes, with several agreeing that the attacks were illegal. The Trump administration insists they are defensible but are facing mounting criticism over their actions.
The US government's handling of these strikes raises concerns about the erosion of checks and balances on power within the executive branch. If left unchecked, this could lead to a catastrophic breakdown in democratic governance.
The situation highlights the need for an independent press that will not shy away from confronting authoritarian leaders and challenging them on human rights abuses. Without it, democracy itself is at risk.