Musicians must embrace 'unstoppable force' of AI, Eurythmics' Dave Stewart urges

"AI is the Unstoppable Force That's Redefining Music Ownership"

In a bold statement, Eurythmics co-founder Dave Stewart has declared that artificial intelligence (AI) is an "unstoppable force" in the music industry. With this assertion comes a call to action: musicians and artists must adapt to the changing landscape by licensing their work to generative AI platforms.

These platforms use sophisticated algorithms to analyze existing songs, allowing them to generate new tracks that mimic specific styles or themes. For instance, an artist could ask an AI platform to create a song about a night out in style reminiscent of Britpop bands. The result is a unique composition that draws from the knowledge base of established artists.

Industry giants Universal and Warner have already partnered with AI platforms like Udio and Suno to offer users the opportunity to make their own music based on licensed work. However, this collaboration has sparked debate about ownership rights. While companies argue that artists must opt-in to these services and receive royalties, Stewart believes that everyone should be selling or licensing their skills to these companies.

"Ill-advised" as it may seem, Stewart sees AI not as a replacement for human creativity but rather as a tool to augment artistic expression. In his opinion, the music industry is on the cusp of a significant transformation, with the disintegration of giant corporations controlling artists at its core.

To counteract this shift, Stewart has launched Rare Entity, a new venture aiming to give creatives total control and ownership of their work. This model seeks to bridge the gap between artistic vision and commercial success by providing financial support for projects and sharing in the earnings generated by the funded ventures.

For Stewart, the inspiration behind Rare Entity dates back to his own struggles with Eurythmics in the early 1980s. The company has undergone significant development since its inception, driven by Stewart's desire to empower artists in a rapidly changing industry.

By embracing AI as a creative force, rather than resisting it, Stewart believes that musicians and artists can harness its power to drive innovation and democratize music ownership. In his own words, "Thou shalt not know exactly what thou dost, but thou shalt do it."

AI is literally changing the game in music ownership . I mean, think about it - you've got these AI platforms creating songs that sound like a combo of iconic artists and styles . And now, labels are jumping on board to offer users the chance to make their own tracks . But here's the thing... who actually owns the music? I'm with Dave Stewart on this one - if AI is gonna be a part of our creative process, we need to figure out how to monetize it properly . Rare Entity sounds like a solid solution, though. Giving artists control over their work and sharing in the profits could be a game-changer . The music industry's about to get real interesting...

AI is literally taking over the music industry now... I mean, I guess it's about time we get some robotic beat-making out of the way . But seriously, can't artists just own up to their work and not have to sell it to these platforms like they're used goods? Dave Stewart's got a point, though - AI is a tool that can be harnessed for good (or bad). Rare Entity sounds like a cool venture, but I'm curious to see how this whole thing plays out... especially with the whole ownership rights thing. Will we just end up with robots making our music and we're just along for the ride ?

I'm low-key excited about the whole AI-generated music thing ... like, who doesn't want their sound to be influenced by some random algorithm . But seriously, I think it's cool that Dave Stewart is trying to make a business out of it, even if his idea of "total control and ownership" sounds kinda like a fancy way of saying "we'll give you money for your work, but don't worry about the details ". I mean, artists should get paid, but can we just get some clarity on what's going to happen to their rights in the process?

AI is finally here and it's going to change the game... or so Dave Stewart thinks . I mean, who wouldn't want their art stolen by a machine? It's not like it's about the creativity and hard work that goes into making music in the first place. Nope, let's just give all our intellectual property to the highest bidder . And what's up with this "augmenting artistic expression" nonsense? Sounds like code for "we're gonna make a ton of money off your baby's first album" . Stewart's got some nerve launching his own venture while profiting from others' struggles... I guess that's just the spirit of entrepreneurship .

I'm so down with this "artistic revolution" ... said no one ever . It's just another way for the suits to line their pockets while artists like Dave Stewart get taken advantage of. I mean, who needs creative control when you can get a sweet payday? Rare Entity sounds like just another corporate spin-off to me . And what's with this "augmenting artistic expression" nonsense? AI is just going to take all the originality out of music and leave us with some soulless algorithm-generated garbage . I'll believe it when I see artists actually getting fair compensation for their work... but until then, I'm just waiting for the inevitable artist payday drought

I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole AI-generated music thing . It's like, I get that it can be kinda cool to hear a new track that sounds like your fave band from back in the day. But at the same time, it feels weird when you think about who actually owns the rights to that song - is it the human creator or some AI algorithm ? It's making me wonder if we're gonna have to get used to seeing 'AI-generated' credits on our music playlists soon .

And what does this mean for artists like Dave Stewart, who want total control over their work? He seems right though - AI is the future, and we should be embracing it instead of fighting it . But I'm still not convinced that 'selling your skills to these companies' is the best way forward . Can someone explain this whole music ownership thing in a super simple way for me, pls?

AI is changing the game in music ownership . I think Dave Stewart makes a point about AI being a tool to enhance creativity, rather than replace it . It's like when you use a camera with filters to make your photos stand out – the camera itself isn't replacing art, just making it easier to express yourself .

I'm curious to see how this plays out. Will artists be able to maintain control over their work while still benefiting from AI-powered platforms? And what about those who can't or don't want to adapt to these changes?

One thing's for sure – the music industry is going through a huge shift, and we need to see how this all plays out .

AI is literally changing the game in music ownership I think it's kinda mind-blowing that Dave Stewart is trying to give artists total control over their work through this Rare Entity thingy. It makes sense though, especially with how big corps are taking over the industry - we need more innovation like this . But at the same time, I'm not sure if everyone should just be selling their skills to AI companies... what about the human touch? Still, it's cool to see Stewart seeing the potential in AI and trying to make it work for the artists

OMG, I'm feeling so inspired by Dave Stewart's vision ! He's right, AI is changing the game in music industry and we gotta adapt... or risk being left behind . But I also get why artists would be hesitant to share their work with these platforms - ownership rights are a big deal . It's cool that he's launching Rare Entity tho , giving creatives more control over their own music. It feels like we're on the cusp of something amazing here . What do you guys think? Are you excited about AI-generated music or do you stick with human-made tracks ?