European leaders scrambled to address the latest provocations from Washington as their meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Downing Street highlighted the deepening crisis between Donald Trump's administration and the EU.
In an attempt to mitigate the damage, Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, and Friedrich Merz hastily convened a summit in response to the US president's aggressive posturing. However, diplomatic improvisation alone cannot fully address the structural threat to European security posed by Trump's America-First ideology.
The White House national security strategy paper, recently released, confirmed the extent of the problem. Laced with contempt for liberal democratic values and a determination to dismantle decades-old security guarantees, the document spells out a vision of a fragmented, weakened Europe that is reliant on US industry and tech. This would render Mr Zelenskyy vulnerable at a critical moment, leaving Europeans exposed to hostile pressure from both Russia and China.
In reality, Trump's approach has created an environment where European leaders must choose between confronting the US president or sacrificing their values. The response must be a belated push towards greater strategic autonomy and unity in defence, as well as promoting European interests in the wider economy.
However, Ursula von der Leyen's handling of trade negotiations with Washington last summer fell short of expectations. Her failure to play hardball has left Europeans vulnerable to US economic pressure. In this context, playing a strong hand is crucial β one that prioritises European interests and promotes unity among EU member states.
The stakes are high. A world where both China and the US seek to undermine the EU's economic position, while Russia harbours darker designs in Eastern Europe, cannot be addressed through diplomatic finesse alone. Europeans must now fight back against what has been described as a "bullying" approach from Washington, one that disregards liberal democratic values and seeks to erode European sovereignty.
This is no time for a romantic view of multilateralism. The EU's economic and security interests demand a strategic response β one that prioritises unity, autonomy, and the promotion of European values in the face of hostile US pressure.
In an attempt to mitigate the damage, Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, and Friedrich Merz hastily convened a summit in response to the US president's aggressive posturing. However, diplomatic improvisation alone cannot fully address the structural threat to European security posed by Trump's America-First ideology.
The White House national security strategy paper, recently released, confirmed the extent of the problem. Laced with contempt for liberal democratic values and a determination to dismantle decades-old security guarantees, the document spells out a vision of a fragmented, weakened Europe that is reliant on US industry and tech. This would render Mr Zelenskyy vulnerable at a critical moment, leaving Europeans exposed to hostile pressure from both Russia and China.
In reality, Trump's approach has created an environment where European leaders must choose between confronting the US president or sacrificing their values. The response must be a belated push towards greater strategic autonomy and unity in defence, as well as promoting European interests in the wider economy.
However, Ursula von der Leyen's handling of trade negotiations with Washington last summer fell short of expectations. Her failure to play hardball has left Europeans vulnerable to US economic pressure. In this context, playing a strong hand is crucial β one that prioritises European interests and promotes unity among EU member states.
The stakes are high. A world where both China and the US seek to undermine the EU's economic position, while Russia harbours darker designs in Eastern Europe, cannot be addressed through diplomatic finesse alone. Europeans must now fight back against what has been described as a "bullying" approach from Washington, one that disregards liberal democratic values and seeks to erode European sovereignty.
This is no time for a romantic view of multilateralism. The EU's economic and security interests demand a strategic response β one that prioritises unity, autonomy, and the promotion of European values in the face of hostile US pressure.