Hamtramck's City Clerk Sues Mayor and Council Over Alleged Retaliation for Reporting Election Fraud
The city clerk of Hamtramck, Rana Faraj, has filed a lawsuit against the mayor, six council members, and the city manager, accusing them of retaliating against her for reporting irregularities in the 2025 election cycle. The complaint alleges that Faraj was "unlawfully retaliated against and constructively discharged" after she notified state officials about ballot harvesting, voter intimidation, and residency fraud.
Faraj had reported these irregularities to Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel on March 12, before criminal charges were filed against two men, including a sitting council member, for alleged absentee-ballot crimes. Her complaint to the state came before she testified against the council member in court, and several other witnesses scheduled to testify had their windows broken out the night before the exam.
The lawsuit argues that Faraj spent months documenting suspicious activity, including surveillance footage showing individuals depositing large bundles of absentee ballots into drop boxes and returning on multiple days. It also alleges that she collected evidence that at least two candidates did not live in Hamtramck but remained on the ballot anyway.
Instead of addressing the alleged misconduct, city leaders allegedly kept an eye on Faraj, monitored her arrival and departure times, and openly discussed trying to find something to hold against her after they learned she had contacted the Attorney General's Office. One council member even told her that colleagues believed she had "authored the AG letter," according to the lawsuit.
The discovery of 37 valid absentee ballots that were never counted in a mayoral race decided by fewer than a dozen votes is also at the center of the lawsuit. Faraj claims that city officials broke the chain of custody, allowing five non-election staff to enter her office after hours and access the ballots, which could no longer be counted under state law.
Faraj was placed on paid administrative leave and publicly accused of "election meddling" and "election interference." She says the accusations were false and part of a coordinated effort to blame her for issues she had repeatedly warned about. The lawsuit alleges that leaks from city officials led to misleading media reports that portrayed Faraj as under investigation, despite the city telling her the leave was not disciplinary.
Attorney Jonathan Marko described Faraj's situation as "not the first time city leadership has gone after someone for speaking up, and at some point it stops being a mistake and starts being a pattern." The lawsuit is intended to hold officials accountable for retaliating against a whistleblower and making clear that enforcing Michigan election law will have serious consequences.
As Hamtramck faces increasing legal scrutiny and investigations, Faraj's lawsuit comes as a warning to the city: failing to protect its employees from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing can lead to severe consequences.
The city clerk of Hamtramck, Rana Faraj, has filed a lawsuit against the mayor, six council members, and the city manager, accusing them of retaliating against her for reporting irregularities in the 2025 election cycle. The complaint alleges that Faraj was "unlawfully retaliated against and constructively discharged" after she notified state officials about ballot harvesting, voter intimidation, and residency fraud.
Faraj had reported these irregularities to Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel on March 12, before criminal charges were filed against two men, including a sitting council member, for alleged absentee-ballot crimes. Her complaint to the state came before she testified against the council member in court, and several other witnesses scheduled to testify had their windows broken out the night before the exam.
The lawsuit argues that Faraj spent months documenting suspicious activity, including surveillance footage showing individuals depositing large bundles of absentee ballots into drop boxes and returning on multiple days. It also alleges that she collected evidence that at least two candidates did not live in Hamtramck but remained on the ballot anyway.
Instead of addressing the alleged misconduct, city leaders allegedly kept an eye on Faraj, monitored her arrival and departure times, and openly discussed trying to find something to hold against her after they learned she had contacted the Attorney General's Office. One council member even told her that colleagues believed she had "authored the AG letter," according to the lawsuit.
The discovery of 37 valid absentee ballots that were never counted in a mayoral race decided by fewer than a dozen votes is also at the center of the lawsuit. Faraj claims that city officials broke the chain of custody, allowing five non-election staff to enter her office after hours and access the ballots, which could no longer be counted under state law.
Faraj was placed on paid administrative leave and publicly accused of "election meddling" and "election interference." She says the accusations were false and part of a coordinated effort to blame her for issues she had repeatedly warned about. The lawsuit alleges that leaks from city officials led to misleading media reports that portrayed Faraj as under investigation, despite the city telling her the leave was not disciplinary.
Attorney Jonathan Marko described Faraj's situation as "not the first time city leadership has gone after someone for speaking up, and at some point it stops being a mistake and starts being a pattern." The lawsuit is intended to hold officials accountable for retaliating against a whistleblower and making clear that enforcing Michigan election law will have serious consequences.
As Hamtramck faces increasing legal scrutiny and investigations, Faraj's lawsuit comes as a warning to the city: failing to protect its employees from retaliation for reporting wrongdoing can lead to severe consequences.