Youth Plan Won't Stem 'Violent Indifference' towards Young People | Zoe Williams
The government's new Youth Matters plan, with a whopping £500m budget aimed at boosting resilience and teaching skills among young people, has been welcomed by many as a necessary step in addressing the 'violent indifference' of politicians towards this age group. However, critics argue that such initiatives are merely a Band-Aid solution to deeper systemic issues.
The government's plan follows Lisa Nandy's scathing critique of the current state of affairs, where young people have seen their economic prospects and work opportunities systematically destroyed since 2010. The tripling of tuition fees, which saddled students with astronomical debts, is just one example of how politicians have prioritized electoral self-interest over the well-being of young people.
Brexit has further exacerbated this situation by removing young people's freedom of movement and making their country poorer. The government's failure to address these issues head-on has led to a significant exodus of young people seeking opportunities abroad, with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand becoming prime destinations.
The proposed mobility scheme is seen as a step in the right direction, but it raises concerns about its potential impact on British youth. With only 44,000 visas available in the first year, critics fear that this will not be enough to stem the tide of emigration. Moreover, the emphasis on young people being 'energetic, adventurous, ambitious' may perpetuate a narrow and outdated view of what it means to be young.
Ultimately, the Youth Matters plan is a long-overdue attempt to acknowledge the struggles faced by young people. However, it remains to be seen whether this initiative will truly address the systemic issues that have led to widespread disillusionment among this age group.
The government's new Youth Matters plan, with a whopping £500m budget aimed at boosting resilience and teaching skills among young people, has been welcomed by many as a necessary step in addressing the 'violent indifference' of politicians towards this age group. However, critics argue that such initiatives are merely a Band-Aid solution to deeper systemic issues.
The government's plan follows Lisa Nandy's scathing critique of the current state of affairs, where young people have seen their economic prospects and work opportunities systematically destroyed since 2010. The tripling of tuition fees, which saddled students with astronomical debts, is just one example of how politicians have prioritized electoral self-interest over the well-being of young people.
Brexit has further exacerbated this situation by removing young people's freedom of movement and making their country poorer. The government's failure to address these issues head-on has led to a significant exodus of young people seeking opportunities abroad, with Australia, Canada, and New Zealand becoming prime destinations.
The proposed mobility scheme is seen as a step in the right direction, but it raises concerns about its potential impact on British youth. With only 44,000 visas available in the first year, critics fear that this will not be enough to stem the tide of emigration. Moreover, the emphasis on young people being 'energetic, adventurous, ambitious' may perpetuate a narrow and outdated view of what it means to be young.
Ultimately, the Youth Matters plan is a long-overdue attempt to acknowledge the struggles faced by young people. However, it remains to be seen whether this initiative will truly address the systemic issues that have led to widespread disillusionment among this age group.