Ruben Amorim's Manchester United team continues to struggle with their preferred 3-4-2-1 formation, despite having a talented squad at their disposal. The system has proven effective for Crystal Palace under Oliver Glasner, who has successfully implemented the 3-4-2-1 setup and achieved top-five status in the Premier League.
One key aspect of Glasner's approach is the importance he places on his back three, featuring Chris Richards, Maxence Lacroix, and Marc Guehi. These centre-backs are marshalling things well in front of Dean Henderson, one of the best goalkeepers in the division. Palace have the second-best defence in terms of goals conceded and are one of only two teams to let in a single-digit goal tally after 12 games.
Glasner's midfield four is another area where his team shines. The wing-backs of Daniel Munoz and Tyrick Mitchell bring intensity, with Munoz running over 14km per game at high intensity this season - more than the next-best player. Meanwhile, Mitchell sits fifth for current Premier League players in terms of tackles won per 90 minutes.
The two sitting midfielders, rotated between Adam Wharton and Jefferson Lerma, set the tone for Palace's play. Their ability to break lines and create overloads in the central areas is key to the team's success. For example, Munoz and Mitchell create an overload by playing narrow to create space behind the opposition's midfield line.
Palace's No 10s, Ismaila Sarr and Yeremy Pino, also play a crucial role in creating this overload. They can occupy multiple centre-backs at once, freeing up other players to make runs in behind. This system requires "pocket" players who can create chaos and confusion among the opposition's midfielders.
United, on the other hand, has struggled to replicate this success with their preferred 3-4-2-1 formation. Their wing-backs have been less effective than Palace's, and their midfield two of Casemiro and Bruno Fernandes has not been as cohesive.
The system also requires "runners" who can make late runs behind the opposition's midfield line. However, United has struggled to find these players in the transfer market, with injuries such as Cunha and Sesko creating holes in the team.
In contrast, Palace have found players who fit the structure of their system. They have a mix of "pocket" players like Sarr and Pino, runners like Munoz and Mitchell, and physical hold-up forwards like Jean-Philippe Mateta.
United's failure to replicate the success of Glasner's team is largely due to their inability to find a cohesive midfield duo. Their system relies on having two central midfielders who can break lines and create overloads in the central areas.
In contrast, Palace have found success by rotating between Wharton and Lerma, who provide a similar level of quality to Casemiro and Fernandes. The team's ability to overload their opponents in the central areas is key to their success, and United would do well to study this approach.
Ultimately, Ruben Amorim must take a closer look at his system and make adjustments to address these weaknesses. With a talented squad at his disposal, there is no reason why Manchester United cannot achieve top-four status with a more cohesive midfield duo.
One key aspect of Glasner's approach is the importance he places on his back three, featuring Chris Richards, Maxence Lacroix, and Marc Guehi. These centre-backs are marshalling things well in front of Dean Henderson, one of the best goalkeepers in the division. Palace have the second-best defence in terms of goals conceded and are one of only two teams to let in a single-digit goal tally after 12 games.
Glasner's midfield four is another area where his team shines. The wing-backs of Daniel Munoz and Tyrick Mitchell bring intensity, with Munoz running over 14km per game at high intensity this season - more than the next-best player. Meanwhile, Mitchell sits fifth for current Premier League players in terms of tackles won per 90 minutes.
The two sitting midfielders, rotated between Adam Wharton and Jefferson Lerma, set the tone for Palace's play. Their ability to break lines and create overloads in the central areas is key to the team's success. For example, Munoz and Mitchell create an overload by playing narrow to create space behind the opposition's midfield line.
Palace's No 10s, Ismaila Sarr and Yeremy Pino, also play a crucial role in creating this overload. They can occupy multiple centre-backs at once, freeing up other players to make runs in behind. This system requires "pocket" players who can create chaos and confusion among the opposition's midfielders.
United, on the other hand, has struggled to replicate this success with their preferred 3-4-2-1 formation. Their wing-backs have been less effective than Palace's, and their midfield two of Casemiro and Bruno Fernandes has not been as cohesive.
The system also requires "runners" who can make late runs behind the opposition's midfield line. However, United has struggled to find these players in the transfer market, with injuries such as Cunha and Sesko creating holes in the team.
In contrast, Palace have found players who fit the structure of their system. They have a mix of "pocket" players like Sarr and Pino, runners like Munoz and Mitchell, and physical hold-up forwards like Jean-Philippe Mateta.
United's failure to replicate the success of Glasner's team is largely due to their inability to find a cohesive midfield duo. Their system relies on having two central midfielders who can break lines and create overloads in the central areas.
In contrast, Palace have found success by rotating between Wharton and Lerma, who provide a similar level of quality to Casemiro and Fernandes. The team's ability to overload their opponents in the central areas is key to their success, and United would do well to study this approach.
Ultimately, Ruben Amorim must take a closer look at his system and make adjustments to address these weaknesses. With a talented squad at his disposal, there is no reason why Manchester United cannot achieve top-four status with a more cohesive midfield duo.