Federal Judges Order Trump Administration to Pay SNAP Benefits During Shutdown
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps, during the ongoing government shutdown. The decision comes after a coalition of states and local governments sued the administration over its plan to cut off funding for the program.
The ruling was made in two separate cases brought by Massachusetts federal court Judge Indira Talwani and Rhode Island Federal District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. Both judges ordered the Trump administration to tap into contingency funds to make payments for SNAP benefits, citing a law that requires the administration to use emergency funds when necessary.
According to the ruling, the $5 billion contingency fund must be used to make partial payments by Wednesday, with the goal of ensuring at least some level of funding for the program. While the judge rejected the administration's argument that the contingency fund cannot be used to cover the shortfall, she did allow the administration to consider reducing benefits for November.
The decision is a significant victory for SNAP recipients, many of whom rely on the program as their main source of food assistance. The Trump administration had announced plans to cut off funding for the program due to the government shutdown, citing the lack of new appropriations.
However, judges Talwani and McConnell rejected the argument that the contingency fund cannot be used to cover the shortfall, arguing that Congress did not place any restrictions on its use in the 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act. The judges also stated that the administration's decision to cut off payments would cause "deterioration of public health and well-being" among recipients.
The ruling comes as the government shutdown enters its 31st day, with no end in sight. President Trump has taken to social media to express his opposition to the ruling, blaming Democrats for causing any delay to the funding.
In a statement on Truth Social, the president wrote that he would be happy to provide funding for SNAP benefits "as soon as possible," but did not commit to doing so immediately. The decision is likely to have significant implications for food insecurity and hunger in the United States, with millions of Americans relying on SNAP benefits to get by.
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, commonly known as food stamps, during the ongoing government shutdown. The decision comes after a coalition of states and local governments sued the administration over its plan to cut off funding for the program.
The ruling was made in two separate cases brought by Massachusetts federal court Judge Indira Talwani and Rhode Island Federal District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. Both judges ordered the Trump administration to tap into contingency funds to make payments for SNAP benefits, citing a law that requires the administration to use emergency funds when necessary.
According to the ruling, the $5 billion contingency fund must be used to make partial payments by Wednesday, with the goal of ensuring at least some level of funding for the program. While the judge rejected the administration's argument that the contingency fund cannot be used to cover the shortfall, she did allow the administration to consider reducing benefits for November.
The decision is a significant victory for SNAP recipients, many of whom rely on the program as their main source of food assistance. The Trump administration had announced plans to cut off funding for the program due to the government shutdown, citing the lack of new appropriations.
However, judges Talwani and McConnell rejected the argument that the contingency fund cannot be used to cover the shortfall, arguing that Congress did not place any restrictions on its use in the 2024 Consolidated Appropriations Act. The judges also stated that the administration's decision to cut off payments would cause "deterioration of public health and well-being" among recipients.
The ruling comes as the government shutdown enters its 31st day, with no end in sight. President Trump has taken to social media to express his opposition to the ruling, blaming Democrats for causing any delay to the funding.
In a statement on Truth Social, the president wrote that he would be happy to provide funding for SNAP benefits "as soon as possible," but did not commit to doing so immediately. The decision is likely to have significant implications for food insecurity and hunger in the United States, with millions of Americans relying on SNAP benefits to get by.