The state of Minnesota has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Homeland Security, alleging that sweeping federal immigration operations in the state have violated federal law. The lawsuit, filed on Monday, claims that the operations, which include raids and arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), have resulted in the deportation of thousands of people without due process or access to counsel.
The lawsuit also alleges that the operations have created a climate of fear among Minnesota's immigrant communities, preventing them from seeking medical care, attending school, and participating in other essential services. The state is seeking an injunction to stop the operations and reimbursement for costs incurred during the litigation.
This development comes as tensions between the Trump administration and Minnesota's Democratic Governor, Tim Walz, have escalated over issues related to immigration enforcement. In 2020, the governor issued a directive banning ICE from conducting enforcement actions in the state without consent.
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of challenges filed by states against federal immigration policies, which have sparked debate over the limits of state authority and the role of local governments in enforcing national laws.
Minnesota's Attorney General, Keith Ellison, said in a statement that the lawsuit is necessary to protect the rights of Minnesota's residents and uphold the rule of law. "We will vigorously defend our state's sovereignty and ensure that our immigration policies are carried out with integrity and respect for due process," he said.
The lawsuit has sparked criticism from some lawmakers, who argue that it contradicts federal law and undermines national security efforts to prevent human trafficking and combat terrorism. However, supporters of the lawsuit say that it is necessary to protect the rights of vulnerable populations and ensure that local governments are not forced to enforce national immigration policies against their will.
The fate of the lawsuit remains uncertain, as it has yet to be heard by a court.
The lawsuit also alleges that the operations have created a climate of fear among Minnesota's immigrant communities, preventing them from seeking medical care, attending school, and participating in other essential services. The state is seeking an injunction to stop the operations and reimbursement for costs incurred during the litigation.
This development comes as tensions between the Trump administration and Minnesota's Democratic Governor, Tim Walz, have escalated over issues related to immigration enforcement. In 2020, the governor issued a directive banning ICE from conducting enforcement actions in the state without consent.
The lawsuit is the latest in a series of challenges filed by states against federal immigration policies, which have sparked debate over the limits of state authority and the role of local governments in enforcing national laws.
Minnesota's Attorney General, Keith Ellison, said in a statement that the lawsuit is necessary to protect the rights of Minnesota's residents and uphold the rule of law. "We will vigorously defend our state's sovereignty and ensure that our immigration policies are carried out with integrity and respect for due process," he said.
The lawsuit has sparked criticism from some lawmakers, who argue that it contradicts federal law and undermines national security efforts to prevent human trafficking and combat terrorism. However, supporters of the lawsuit say that it is necessary to protect the rights of vulnerable populations and ensure that local governments are not forced to enforce national immigration policies against their will.
The fate of the lawsuit remains uncertain, as it has yet to be heard by a court.