When it comes to crafting a compelling documentary, young filmmakers often tell aspiring creators that some stories are better suited for an article rather than a full-length film. Marshall Curry's latest project, The New Yorker at 100, serves as a testament to this philosophy, but with a fascinating twist.
Curry and his team spent a year digging through the archives of America's iconic magazine, capturing the essence of its operations and interviewing some of its most prominent writers. What they uncovered was not a story of strife or drama, but rather one of dedication and perseverance. Despite facing challenges in an increasingly digital media landscape, The New Yorker has managed to maintain its unique voice and commitment to quality.
One of the magazine's key strengths lies in its approach to storytelling. Rather than chasing fleeting trends or attempting to be all things to all people, The New Yorker takes a more curated approach, focusing on thoughtful essays, witty cartoons, and insightful profiles. This strategy has allowed it to build a loyal readership that values substance over style.
The documentary pays homage to this approach, showcasing the magazine's ability to adapt while staying true to its core principles. From Truman Capote's groundbreaking In Cold Blood to the work of contemporary writers like Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Sarah Jessica Parker, The New Yorker at 100 celebrates the magazine's rich history and its commitment to excellence.
However, as with any institution facing an uncertain future, concerns about The New Yorker's long-term viability persist. Will it continue to thrive under David Remnick's leadership, or will it become a relic of the past? Curry's documentary offers no easy answers but instead provides a nuanced exploration of the magazine's values and its place in the world.
Ultimately, The New Yorker at 100 serves as a love letter to an institution that has been quietly shaping American culture for nearly a century. It is a testament to the power of quality journalism and the enduring importance of thoughtful storytelling.
Curry and his team spent a year digging through the archives of America's iconic magazine, capturing the essence of its operations and interviewing some of its most prominent writers. What they uncovered was not a story of strife or drama, but rather one of dedication and perseverance. Despite facing challenges in an increasingly digital media landscape, The New Yorker has managed to maintain its unique voice and commitment to quality.
One of the magazine's key strengths lies in its approach to storytelling. Rather than chasing fleeting trends or attempting to be all things to all people, The New Yorker takes a more curated approach, focusing on thoughtful essays, witty cartoons, and insightful profiles. This strategy has allowed it to build a loyal readership that values substance over style.
The documentary pays homage to this approach, showcasing the magazine's ability to adapt while staying true to its core principles. From Truman Capote's groundbreaking In Cold Blood to the work of contemporary writers like Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Sarah Jessica Parker, The New Yorker at 100 celebrates the magazine's rich history and its commitment to excellence.
However, as with any institution facing an uncertain future, concerns about The New Yorker's long-term viability persist. Will it continue to thrive under David Remnick's leadership, or will it become a relic of the past? Curry's documentary offers no easy answers but instead provides a nuanced exploration of the magazine's values and its place in the world.
Ultimately, The New Yorker at 100 serves as a love letter to an institution that has been quietly shaping American culture for nearly a century. It is a testament to the power of quality journalism and the enduring importance of thoughtful storytelling.
The way it shines a light on the dedication & perseverance of The New Yorker is so inspiring 
And I think it's a major part of their success - they don't try to be everything to everyone, they just do them in-depth and authentically 
. It's like they're saying, "Hey world, we've been around for 100 years, and we're still here because we care about telling the right stories" 
. Now, I'm not sure what the future holds, but this docu gives me hope that quality journalism will always prevail 
. Like, what about their personal stories? How do they deal with the pressures of creatin' quality content in a rapidly changin' world? I feel like we need more nuanced exploration of that stuff too 
, but at the same time, I'm like, what about the future? 
I mean, it's great that they have such a loyal readership, but can't we get more new folks in on the action too? 
I guess it's all good though, 'cause at the end of the day, The New Yorker is still putting out awesome content and inspiring people to think 
. and you know what's even cooler? how they're still holding true to their values after all these years 
. and let's be real, who wouldn't want to see more essays from chimamanda adichie 
?
i loved how they could tell you something so deep and meaningful with just a few words, like truman capote's essay on in cold blood still gives me chills to this day 
anyway it got me thinking about the future of journalism and whether or not we'll ever see another outlet that can do what the new yorker does 
! I mean, The New Yorker has always been my go-to for in-depth essays and articles, you know? And now, Marshall Curry's project is like a masterclass on how to do it right 
. And the way Curry showcases their adaptability while staying true to their core principles? Genius 
. I'm totally on board with this docu, it's like a love letter to journalism at its finest 
.
Just saw that a new study says air pollution in NYC is getting worse, with particulate matter levels reaching toxic levels on 20 days last year alone 
. Guess all that progress is being washed away by our dirty habits...
AND MARSHALL CURRY'S DOC IS LIKE A LOVE LETTER FROM THE EDITORSHIP - IT SHOWS THEM AT THEIR BEST! 
. The New Yorker's commitment to quality over quantity is so refreshing. I love how they're not trying to chase trends or be everything to everyone – that just doesn't feel authentic. It's amazing to see how they've managed to stay true to themselves for so long, especially in a world where media is getting more and more noisy 
their approach to storytelling is so on point, focusing on thoughtful essays and witty cartoons - it's like they're speaking straight to my soul 
. and the way they celebrate Truman Capote and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, it's just amazing! david remnick is literally a hero for still leading them with such passion and vision 
. I mean, who needs likes on social media when you have deep, thoughtful essays that make you think? 
. Of course, there are still questions about the future of journalism in general, but this doc makes me feel hopeful that places like The New Yorker will continue to thrive 
. They even talked to some amazing writers like Chimamanda & Sarah Jessica Parker 
. The New Yorker's commitment to excellence is admirable, but it also raises questions about the tension between innovation and tradition in an ever-changing world.
.
... I mean, Marshall Curry and his team spent a year digging through The New Yorker's archives? That sounds like a whole lotta coffee 
️. But seriously, it's cool to see them celebrating the magazine's dedication to quality journalism – that's what we need more of! Although, I'm still wondering if this documentary is going to make me care about the future of The New Yorker... did they order a subscription or something? 
from truman capote to chimamanda adichie - the connections are amazing! 
only time will tell 
#documentary #newyorker #qualityjournalism