Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's Response to Kamala Harris' Tell-All Memoir Reveals Tensions Within the Democratic Party.
Governor Shapiro was reportedly taken aback by certain claims made in former Vice President Kamala Harris' memoir, "107 Days," which he described as "blatant lies." According to journalist Tim Alberta, who profiled Shapiro for The Atlantic, the governor expressed his outrage and exasperation while sharing these characterizations of himself.
Shapiro's verbal sparring with Harris was reminiscent of a heated debate. When asked if he felt betrayed by Harris' memoir, Shapiro made it clear that he saw her accounts as an attempt to deflect blame after a disappointing loss in the 2020 election. He claimed she was more interested in selling books than being truthful.
However, Shapiro did not mince words when discussing his own experiences with Harris during their time on the campaign trail. The governor stated that Harris had portrayed him as overconfident and domineering, calling some of her claims "complete bulls**t." In a later statement, Shapiro attempted to backtrack on his remarks, acknowledging that he should not have used that language.
Despite the tension between him and Harris, Shapiro remains a strong voice within the Democratic Party. As a proven swing-state winner who has expressed a desire for the top job, he is an important figure in the party's 2028 election efforts.
In The Atlantic piece, Shapiro emphasized the need for Democrats to reconnect with disaffected voters, particularly those in non-college-educated communities who feel left behind by the party. He argued that they have been failing to show up and treat these individuals with respect, whereas former President Donald Trump has successfully connected with them on a deeper cultural level.
Shapiro was particularly critical of Trump's policy-making, citing Medicaid cuts as a betrayal of MAGA voters in Pennsylvania. He accused Trump of lying to these communities and then abandoning them by taking away their healthcare to benefit high-income earners who do not need it.
Overall, Shapiro's response to Harris' memoir suggests that the Democratic Party is facing internal conflicts about how to reach out to disaffected voters. While some leaders are struggling to connect with these individuals, others, like Shapiro, see an opportunity to build bridges and fight for them.
Governor Shapiro was reportedly taken aback by certain claims made in former Vice President Kamala Harris' memoir, "107 Days," which he described as "blatant lies." According to journalist Tim Alberta, who profiled Shapiro for The Atlantic, the governor expressed his outrage and exasperation while sharing these characterizations of himself.
Shapiro's verbal sparring with Harris was reminiscent of a heated debate. When asked if he felt betrayed by Harris' memoir, Shapiro made it clear that he saw her accounts as an attempt to deflect blame after a disappointing loss in the 2020 election. He claimed she was more interested in selling books than being truthful.
However, Shapiro did not mince words when discussing his own experiences with Harris during their time on the campaign trail. The governor stated that Harris had portrayed him as overconfident and domineering, calling some of her claims "complete bulls**t." In a later statement, Shapiro attempted to backtrack on his remarks, acknowledging that he should not have used that language.
Despite the tension between him and Harris, Shapiro remains a strong voice within the Democratic Party. As a proven swing-state winner who has expressed a desire for the top job, he is an important figure in the party's 2028 election efforts.
In The Atlantic piece, Shapiro emphasized the need for Democrats to reconnect with disaffected voters, particularly those in non-college-educated communities who feel left behind by the party. He argued that they have been failing to show up and treat these individuals with respect, whereas former President Donald Trump has successfully connected with them on a deeper cultural level.
Shapiro was particularly critical of Trump's policy-making, citing Medicaid cuts as a betrayal of MAGA voters in Pennsylvania. He accused Trump of lying to these communities and then abandoning them by taking away their healthcare to benefit high-income earners who do not need it.
Overall, Shapiro's response to Harris' memoir suggests that the Democratic Party is facing internal conflicts about how to reach out to disaffected voters. While some leaders are struggling to connect with these individuals, others, like Shapiro, see an opportunity to build bridges and fight for them.
But at the same time, I get why he'd feel betrayed - they were supposed to be on the same team. And can we talk about how Trump is still getting away with this stuff? Medicaid cuts are a huge swing-state issue and Shapiro is right to call them out. He's actually being pretty pragmatic about what's gonna help him win in '28... might not make everyone happy, but it's a calculated risk, you know? 
This whole thing with Kamala Harris' memoir and Josh Shapiro's response is wild 
. I mean, I get why they're both trying to one-up each other, but can't we just focus on finding a way to connect with those disaffected voters? Like, it sounds like Shapiro has some solid points about how the party needs to do better, especially when it comes to Medicaid and healthcare for all 
. At the same time, I'm here for Kamala Harris being unafraid to share her side of the story – it's not always easy to speak truth to power 
. What do you guys think is at play here? Is this just a case of party politics gone wild 
, or are we seeing some real cracks in the Democratic Party's approach to outreach?
. I gotta say, I'm a bit surprised by the whole thing. I mean, Harris' memoir seemed kinda obvious, just a way to stir up some drama. But at the same time, Shapiro's reaction does seem pretty intense. Like, who uses that kind of language? 
It's like, calm down dude. Anyway, what really caught my attention was his whole thing about the Democratic Party needing to reach out to disaffected voters. That makes total sense to me. We've gotta be willing to listen and work with people who feel left behind. Otherwise, we're just gonna keep losing. 
The way Shapiro called out some of her claims as "blatant lies" does give me pause tho - are we really that desperate for info that we'll just accept whatever we're given without fact-checking? 
He's got a point about how the party's been neglecting these communities, and we need leaders who are willing to listen and adapt 
What do you guys think - should we be having more of these kinds of public spats between Dem leaders or would it be better for them to just keep their differences under wraps? 
! I think Shapiro's response to Harris' memoir was kinda justified 
. Harris did have some pretty scathing comments about him in her book, so it's only fair that he called them out 
. but at the same time, using "blatant lies" and "complete bulls**t" might not be the best way to address it 
It's clear that Shapiro is trying to position himself as a voice of reason on how to connect with disaffected voters, especially in swing states like Pennsylvania. 
.
And I gotta say, his criticism of Trump's policy-making seems pretty spot on 
. Medicaid cuts are a real betrayal of working-class communities, and it's not okay that they're being hurt for the benefit of others.
! 
on this whole Kamala Harris thing... apparently, she didn't exactly win over Governor Shapiro with her tell-all memoir 
. He's super upset about some of the things she said about him, and I can see why he'd be salty - those "blatant lies" are not something to joke about 
.
.
.
. Anyway, I think Shapiro makes some good points about reaching out to disaffected voters and all that jazz... maybe he can be like a bridge-builder or something? 
But at the same time, Harris has got some major issues with trust and honesty going on in her book... it's gonna be hard for people to take her seriously after reading that 
i mean, shapiro's trying to hold on to his reputation as a leader who cares about the common folk, but his words kinda came across as petty & vindictive 
... I mean, who knew they had such a complicated past? 
... but at the same time, he's not afraid to throw shade back 
... Shapiro thinks they need to do better with disaffected voters, especially in swing states like Pennsylvania 
... and I gotta agree with him on that one 
... but what's going to happen if they can't put their differences aside? 
.
. Shapiro's trying to spin this as some kind of battle for control within the party, but let's be real, he's just mad that Harris called him out on his own flaws 
shapiro's right on target when he says they're being treated like dirt by the party 
meanwhile harris' attempts to deflect blame after that 2020 loss just feel...off 
. Like, you can feel the tension between them from the get-go 
.
, but at the same time, I think it's also super important to have honest conversations about where we're going wrong and how we can do better 
. Maybe instead of getting all worked up about Harris' memoir, they should be focusing on how to actually connect with those voters and make their lives better? 